Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

v3.10.0.1
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
6 Months Ended
Aug. 31, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:

Authoritative guidance establishes a framework for measuring fair value, including a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. The hierarchy includes three levels:

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2 inputs include data points that are observable such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical assets or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs (other than quoted prices) such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable for the asset and liability, either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3 inputs are unobservable data points for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.

Fair value methodology and assumptions –
The following methods and assumptions are used to estimate the fair value for each class of our financial instruments:

Foreign currency and commodity derivative contracts: The fair value is estimated using market-based inputs, obtained from independent pricing services, entered into valuation models. These valuation models require various inputs, including contractual terms, market foreign exchange prices, market commodity prices, interest-rate yield curves and currency volatilities, as applicable (Level 2 fair value measurement).
Interest rate swap contracts: The fair value is estimated based on quoted market prices from respective counterparties. Quotes are corroborated by using discounted cash flow calculations based upon forward interest-rate yield curves, which are obtained from independent pricing services (Level 2 fair value measurement).
Equity securities: In November 2017, we acquired (i)  a 9.9% ownership interest in Ontario, Canada-based Canopy Growth Corporation (the “Original Canopy Investment”), a public company and leading provider of medicinal cannabis products (“Canopy”), and (ii)  warrants which give us the option to purchase an additional ownership interest in Canopy Growth Corporation (the “Original Canopy Warrants”) for C$245.0 million, or $191.3 million (see Note 16). The Canopy Warrants expire in May 2020. For the six months and three months ended August 31, 2018, we recognized unrealized gains of $896.9 million and $638.6 million, respectively, from the changes in fair value of the Original Canopy Investment and the Original Canopy Warrants, which are included in income from unconsolidated investments. The fair value of the Original Canopy Investment is calculated by using the closing market price of the underlying equity security (Level 1 fair value measurement). The fair value of the Original Canopy Warrants is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model (Level 2 fair value measurement). As of August 31, 2018, the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the Original Canopy Warrants are as follows:
Expected life (1)
1.7 years

Expected volatility (2)
73.6
%
Risk-free interest rate (3)
2.0
%
Expected dividend yield (4)
0.0
%
(1) 
Based on the expiration date of the warrants.
(2) 
Based on historical volatility levels of the underlying equity security.
(3) 
Based on the implied yield currently available on Canadian Treasury zero coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life.
(4) 
Based on historical dividend levels.
Debt securities, Convertible: In June 2018, we acquired convertible debt securities issued by Canopy for C$200.0 million, or $150.5 million (the “Canopy Debt Securities”). We have elected the fair value option to account for the Canopy Debt Securities. This provides the greatest level of consistency with the accounting treatment for the Original Canopy Warrants. Additionally, interest income on the Canopy Debt Securities is calculated using the effective interest method and is recognized separately from the changes in fair value within interest expense. The Canopy Debt Securities have a contractual maturity of five years from the date of issuance, but may be converted prior to maturity by either party upon the occurrence of certain events. At settlement, the Canopy Debt Securities can be settled at the option of the issuer, in cash, equity shares of the issuer, or a combination thereof. For the six months and three months ended August 31, 2018, we recognized an unrealized gain of $53.5 million from the changes in fair value of the Canopy Debt Securities, which is included in income from unconsolidated investments. The fair value is estimated using a binomial lattice option-pricing model (Level 2 fair value measurement). As of August 31, 2018, the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the Canopy Debt Securities are as follows:
Remaining term (1)
4.9 years

Expected volatility (2)
43.0
%
Risk-free interest rate (3)
2.2
%
Expected dividend yield (4)
0.0
%
(1) 
Based on the contractual maturity date of the notes.
(2) 
Based on historical volatility levels of the underlying equity security reduced to account for certain risks not incorporated into the option-pricing model.
(3) 
Based on the implied yield currently available on Canadian Treasury zero coupon issues with a term equal to the remaining contractual term of the debt securities.
(4) 
Based on historical dividend levels.
Debt securities, Available-for-sale (“AFS”): The fair value is estimated by discounting cash flows using market-based inputs (Level 3 fair value measurement) (see Note 8).
Short-term borrowings: The revolving credit facility under our senior credit facility is a variable interest rate bearing note which includes a fixed margin which is adjustable based upon our debt rating (as defined in our senior credit facility). Its fair value is estimated by discounting cash flows using LIBOR plus a margin reflecting current market conditions obtained from participating member financial institutions (Level 2 fair value measurement). The remaining instruments, including our commercial paper and accounts receivable securitization facilities, are variable interest rate bearing notes for which the carrying value approximates the fair value.
Long-term debt: The term loan under our senior credit facility is a variable interest rate bearing note which includes a fixed margin which is adjustable based upon our debt rating. The fair value of the term loan is estimated by discounting cash flows using LIBOR plus a margin reflecting current market conditions obtained from participating member financial institutions (Level 2 fair value measurement). The fair value of the remaining long-term debt, which is primarily fixed interest rate, is estimated by discounting cash flows using interest rates currently available for debt with similar terms and maturities (Level 2 fair value measurement).

The carrying amounts of certain of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term borrowings, approximate fair value as of August 31, 2018, and February 28, 2018, due to the relatively short maturity of these instruments. As of August 31, 2018, the carrying amount of long-term debt, including the current portion, was $9,206.5 million, compared with an estimated fair value of $9,015.6 million. As of February 28, 2018, the carrying amount of long-term debt, including the current portion, was $9,439.9 million, compared with an estimated fair value of $9,398.4 million.

Recurring basis measurements –
The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis:
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
 
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
August 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
$

 
$
36.9

 
$

 
$
36.9

Commodity derivative contracts
$

 
$
12.8

 
$

 
$
12.8

Interest rate swap contracts
$

 
$
2.7

 
$

 
$
2.7

Equity securities
$
863.3

 
$
689.1

 
$

 
$
1,552.4

Canopy Debt Securities
$

 
$
206.8

 
$

 
$
206.8

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
$

 
$
34.1

 
$

 
$
34.1

Commodity derivative contracts
$

 
$
4.7

 
$

 
$
4.7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
February 28, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
$

 
$
40.3

 
$

 
$
40.3

Commodity derivative contracts
$

 
$
9.1

 
$

 
$
9.1

Equity securities
$
402.4

 
$
253.2

 
$

 
$
655.6

Debt securities, AFS
$

 
$

 
$
16.6

 
$
16.6

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency contracts
$

 
$
19.9

 
$

 
$
19.9

Commodity derivative contracts
$

 
$
5.6

 
$

 
$
5.6



Nonrecurring basis measurements –
The following table presents our assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a nonrecurring basis for which an impairment assessment was performed for the period presented:
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
 
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total Losses
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
For the Six Months Ended August 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trademarks
$

 
$

 
$
136.0

 
$
86.8



For the first quarter of fiscal 2018, we identified certain negative trends within our Beer segment’s Ballast Point craft beer portfolio which, when combined with the then-recent negative craft beer industry trends, indicated that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our indefinite lived intangible asset associated with the craft beer trademarks might be below its carrying value. Accordingly, we performed a quantitative assessment for impairment of the craft beer trademark asset. As a result of this assessment, the craft beer trademark asset with a carrying value of $222.8 million was written down to its estimated fair value of $136.0 million, resulting in an impairment of $86.8 million. This impairment is included in selling, general and administrative expenses.