10-K: Annual report pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)
Published on May 2, 2006
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
x
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
fiscal year ended February 28, 2006
OR
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from ____________________ to ____________________
Commission
File Number 001-08495
CONSTELLATION
BRANDS, INC.
|
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
|
16-0716709
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
370
Woodcliff Drive, Suite 300, Fairport, New York
14450
|
(Address
of principal executive
offices)
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code (585)
218-3600
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
|
Name
of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Class
A Common Stock (par value $.01 per share)
|
New
York Stock Exchange
|
|
Class
B Common Stock (par value $.01 per share)
|
New
York Stock Exchange
|
|
Depositary
Shares Each Representing 1/40 of a
Share
of 5.75% Series A Mandatory
Convertible
Preferred Stock (par value $.01
per
share)
|
New
York Stock Exchange
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate
by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined
in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes X
No
___
Indicate
by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ___ No
X
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes X
No
___
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this
Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
One):
Large
Accelerated Filer X Accelerated
Filer ___ Non-accelerated
Filer ___
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ___ No X
The
aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates of
the
Registrant, based upon the closing sales prices of the Registrant’s Class A and
Class B Common Stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange as of the last
business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter
was $5,409,187,385. The Registrant has no non-voting common equity.
The
number of shares outstanding with respect to each of the classes of common
stock
of Constellation Brands, Inc., as of April 14, 2006, is set forth
below:
Class
|
Number
of Shares Outstanding
|
|
Class
A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
|
199,619,196
|
|
Class
B Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
|
23,853,038
|
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The
proxy
statement of Constellation Brands, Inc. to be issued for the Annual Meeting
of
Stockholders which is expected to be held July 27, 2006 is incorporated by
reference in Part III to the extent described therein.
========================================================================================================================================
|
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These
forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties,
many of which are beyond the Company’s control, that could cause actual results
to differ materially from those set forth in, or implied by, such
forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical
facts included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the statements
under Item 1 “Business” and Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations” regarding the Company’s business
strategy, future financial position, prospects, plans and objectives of
management, as well as information concerning expected actions of third parties
are forward-looking statements. When used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K,
the words “anticipate,” “intend,” “expect,” and similar expressions are intended
to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking
statements contain such identifying words. All forward-looking statements speak
only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company undertakes
no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as
a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. Although the Company
believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements
are
reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be
correct. In addition to the risks and uncertainties of ordinary business
operations, important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those set forth in, or implied, by the Company’s forward-looking
statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are those described
in
Item 1A “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report and in other Company filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
PART
I
Item
1. Business
Introduction
Unless
the context otherwise requires, the terms “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us” refer
to Constellation Brands, Inc. and its subsidiaries, and all references to “net
sales” refer to gross sales less promotions, returns and allowances, and excise
taxes to conform with the Company’s method of classification. All references to
“Fiscal 2006,” “Fiscal 2005” and “Fiscal 2004” shall refer to the Company’s
fiscal year ended the last day of February of the indicated year. All references
to “Fiscal 2007” shall refer to the Company’s fiscal year ending February 28,
2007.
Market
positions and industry
data discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are as of calendar 2005 and
have been obtained or
derived
from
industry and government publications and Company estimates. The industry and
government publications include: Adams Liquor Handbook; Adams Wine Handbook;
Adams Beer Handbook; Adams Handbook Advance; The U.S. Wine Market: Impact
Databank Review and Forecast; The U.S. Beer Market: Impact Databank Review
and
Forecast; The U.S. Spirits Market: Impact Databank Review and Forecast;
International Wine and Spirit Record; Euromonitor; Australian Bureau of
Statistics; Information Resources, Inc.; ACNielsen; AZTEC; Beer
Marketer’s Insights; The Beer Institute; and DISCUS.
The
Company has not independently verified the data from the industry and government
publications. Unless otherwise noted, all references to market positions are
based on unit volume.
The
Company is a Delaware corporation incorporated on December 4, 1972, as the
successor to a business founded in 1945. The Company has approximately
7,900
employees located throughout the world and the corporate headquarters are
located in Fairport, New York.
1
The
Company is a leading international producer and marketer of beverage alcohol
with a broad portfolio of brands across the wine, imported beer and spirits
categories. The Company has the largest wine business in the world and has
a
leading market position in each of its core markets, which include the United
States, United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand.
In
the
United States, the Company is the largest multi-category (wine, imported beer
and spirits) supplier of beverage alcohol. In addition to its position in wine,
the Company is the largest marketer of imported beer in 25 primarily western
states, where it has exclusive rights to distribute the Mexican brands in its
portfolio, and is a leading producer and marketer of distilled spirits. With
its
broad product portfolio, the Company believes it is distinctly positioned to
satisfy an array of consumer preferences across all beverage alcohol categories
and price points.
Many
of
the Company’s products are recognized leaders in their respective categories and
geographic markets. The Company’s strong market positions make the Company a
supplier of choice to its customers, who include wholesale distributors,
retailers and on-premise locations.
In
addition, in the United Kingdom, the Company is the leading independent
(non-brewery-owned) drinks wholesaler, providing a full range of beverage
alcohol and soft drinks to the on-premise trade. The Company leverages this
business as a strategic route-to-market for its imported wine
portfolio.
Net
sales
by product category are summarized as follows:
For
the Year
Ended
February
28,
2006
|
%
of
Total
|
For
the Year
Ended
February
28,
2005
|
%
of
Total
|
||||||||||
(in
millions)
|
|||||||||||||
Branded
wine
|
$
|
2,263.4
|
49
|
%
|
$
|
1,830.8
|
45
|
%
|
|||||
Wholesale
and other
|
972.0
|
21
|
%
|
1,020.6
|
25
|
%
|
|||||||
Imported
beers
|
1,043.5
|
23
|
%
|
922.9
|
22
|
%
|
|||||||
Spirits
|
324.5
|
7
|
%
|
313.3
|
8
|
%
|
|||||||
Consolidated
Net Sales
|
$
|
4,603.4
|
100
|
%
|
$
|
4,087.6
|
100
|
%
|
The
Company’s geographic markets include North America (primarily the United
States), Europe (primarily the United Kingdom) and Australasia (primarily
Australia and New Zealand). Net sales by geographic area (based on the location
of the selling company) are summarized as follows:
For
the Year
Ended
February
28,
2006
|
%
of
Total
|
For
the Year
Ended
February
28,
2005
|
%
of
Total
|
||||||||||
(in
millions)
|
|||||||||||||
North
America
|
$
|
2,912.1
|
63
|
%
|
$
|
2,387.3
|
58
|
%
|
|||||
Europe
|
1,372.0
|
30
|
%
|
1,385.6
|
34
|
%
|
|||||||
Australasia
|
319.3
|
7
|
%
|
314.7
|
8
|
%
|
|||||||
Consolidated
Net Sales
|
$
|
4,603.4
|
100
|
%
|
$
|
4,087.6
|
100
|
%
|
2
There
are
certain key trends within the beverage alcohol industry which
include:
· |
Consolidation
of wholesalers and retailers; and
|
· |
Attractive
consumer trends which include:
|
· |
An
increase in global wine
consumption;
|
· |
Growth
of New World wines (wines produced from the United States, Australia,
New
Zealand, Chile, Argentina and South Africa) in the Company’s core markets
outpacing growth of Old World wines (wines primarily produced in
European
countries including France, Germany, Spain and
Italy);
|
· |
Wine
and spirits categories growing at a faster rate than the beer category,
particularly in the U.S. and the U.K.;
and
|
· |
Consumers
“trading up” to premium products within each category. On a global basis,
within the wine category, premium wines are growing faster than
value-priced wines. In the United States, within the beer category,
imported beers are growing faster than domestic beers, and premium
spirits
are growing faster than value-priced
spirits.
|
To
capitalize on these trends, the Company has employed a strategy of growing
through a combination of internal growth and acquisitions to become more
competitive, with a focus on the faster growing segments of the beverage alcohol
industry and developing strong market positions in the wine, imported beer
and
spirits categories. Key elements of the Company’s strategy include:
· |
Leveraging
the Company’s existing portfolio of leading
brands;
|
· |
Developing
new products, new packaging and line
extensions;
|
· |
Diversifying
the Company’s product portfolio with an emphasis on premium spirits and
premium, super-premium and fine
wines;
|
· |
Diversifying
geographic markets with a focus on expansion in Canada, Western Europe,
Eastern Europe and Japan;
|
· |
Strengthening
its relationships with wholesalers and
retailers;
|
· |
Expanding
its distribution and enhancing its production
capabilities;
|
· |
Realizing
operating synergies; and
|
· |
Acquiring
additional management, operational, marketing, and product development
expertise.
|
As
part
of the Company’s strategy outlined above, on April 2, 2006, the Company entered
into an arrangement agreement with Vincor International Inc. (“Vincor”) under
which, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, the Company will
acquire all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Vincor at a cash
price of Cdn$36.50 per common share. The transaction, including Vincor’s
outstanding indebtedness, is valued at approximately Cdn$1.5 billion and is
currently expected to be completed in early June 2006. Vincor is Canada’s
largest producer and marketer of wines, and as such, Canada would become a
core
market for the Company. Vincor is also a marketer of wine in the United Kingdom,
including the leading South African wine, and a producer and marketer of
premium, super-premium and fine wines from California, Washington State, Western
Australia and New Zealand. Vincor’s well-known brands include Inniskillin,
Jackson-Triggs, Sumac Ridge, Hawthorne Mountain, Sawmill Creek, Notre Vin
Maison, Entre-Lacs, L’Ambiance, Caballero de Chile, Spumante Bambino, President
Canadian Champagne, and Okanagan Vineyards, all of which are produced in Canada.
In addition, R.H. Phillips, Toasted Head, and Hogue are produced in the United
States, Goundrey and Amberley are produced in Australia, Kim Crawford is
produced in New Zealand and Kumala is produced in South
Africa.
3
Recent
Acquisitions and Equity Method Investments
In
December 2004, the Company acquired The Robert Mondavi Corporation (“Robert
Mondavi”), a leading premium wine producer based in Napa, California.
Through
this transaction, the Company acquired various additional winery and vineyard
interests, and, additionally produces, markets and sells premium, super-premium
and fine California wines under
the
Woodbridge by Robert Mondavi, Robert Mondavi Private Selection and Robert
Mondavi Winery brand names. Woodbridge and Robert Mondavi Private Selection
are
the leading domestic premium and super-premium wine brands, respectively, in
the
United States.
As a
result of the Robert Mondavi acquisition, the Company acquired an ownership
interest in Opus One, a joint venture owned equally by Robert Mondavi and Baron
Philippe de Rothschild, S.A. During September 2005, the Company’s president and
Baroness Philippine de Rothschild announced an agreement to maintain equal
ownership of Opus One. Opus One produces fine wines at its Napa Valley
winery.
The
acquisition of Robert Mondavi supports the Company’s strategy of strengthening
the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall
growth in the premium, super-premium and fine wine categories. The Company
believes that the acquired Robert Mondavi brand names have strong brand
recognition globally. The vast majority of Robert Mondavi’s sales are generated
in the United States. The Company is leveraging the Robert Mondavi brands in
the
United States through its selling, marketing and distribution infrastructure.
The Company also intends to further expand distribution for the Robert Mondavi
brands in Europe through its Constellation Europe infrastructure. Distribution
of the Robert Mondavi Woodbridge brand in the U.K. market is underway and the
brand has been introduced into most major U.K. retailers.
In
December 2004, the Company purchased a 40% interest in Ruffino S.r.l.
(“Ruffino”), the well-known Italian fine wine company, and in February 2005, the
Constellation Wines segment began distributing Ruffino’s products in the United
States. Also in December 2004, the Company became a 50% owner in a joint venture
with jstar Brands called Planet 10 Spirits. The objective of Planet 10 Spirits
is to create and market premium spirit brands in the United States and key
export markets. The first product from this joint venture is Effen Vodka, a
luxury brand imported from Holland.
In
April
2003, the Company completed the acquisition of BRL Hardy Limited, now known
as
Hardy Wine Company Limited (“Hardy”), Australia’s largest producer of wine,
which enhanced the Company’s overall growth prospects and gave the Company an
immediate presence in the Australian domestic and export markets. As a result
of
the acquisition of Hardy, the Company also acquired the remaining 50% ownership
of Pacific Wine Partners LLC (“PWP”), the joint venture the Company established
with Hardy in July 2001 that produces, markets and sells a portfolio of premium
wine in the United States, including a range of Australian imports. The
acquisition of Hardy along with the remaining interest in PWP is referred to
together as the “Hardy Acquisition.” Among the well-known brands acquired in the
Hardy Acquisition are Banrock Station, Hardys Nottage Hill, Hardys Stamp and
VR,
Eileen Hardy, Sir James, Omni, Nobilo, Leasingham and Houghton. In October
2005,
PWP was merged into another subsidiary of the Company.
For
more
information about these transactions,
see
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
4
Business
Segments
The
Company’s internal organization structure consists of two business divisions,
Constellation Wines and Constellation Beers and Spirits. Consequently, the
Company reports its operating results in three segments: Constellation Wines
(branded wine, and U.K. wholesale and other), Constellation Beers and Spirits
(imported beers and distilled spirits) and Corporate Operations and Other.
The
business segments, described more fully below, reflect how the Company’s
operations are being managed, how operating performance within the Company
is
being evaluated by senior management and the structure of its internal financial
reporting.
Information
regarding net sales, operating income and total assets of each of the Company’s
business segments and information regarding geographic areas is set forth in
Note 22 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements located in Item 8 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Constellation
Wines
Constellation
Wines is the leading producer and marketer of wine in the world. It sells a
large number of wine brands across all categories - table wine, sparkling wine
and dessert wine - and across all price points - popular, premium, super-premium
and fine wine. The portfolio of super-premium and fine wines is supported by
vineyard holdings in the United States, Australia, New Zealand and Chile. As
the
largest producer and marketer of wine in the world, Constellation Wines has
leading market positions in several countries. It
is a
leading producer and marketer of wine in the United States, Australia and New
Zealand and the largest marketer of wine in the United Kingdom.
Wine
produced by the Company in the United States is primarily marketed domestically
and in the United Kingdom. Wine produced in Australia and New Zealand is
primarily marketed domestically and in the United States and United Kingdom,
while wine produced in Chile is primarily marketed in the United States and
United Kingdom. In addition, Constellation Wines exports its wine products
to
other major wine consuming markets of the world.
In
the
United States, Constellation Wines sells 19 of the top-selling 100
table
wine brands and has one of the largest fine wine portfolios. In the United
Kingdom, it has seven of the top-selling 20 table wine brands and the best
selling brand of fortified British wine. In Australia, it has wine brands across
all price points and varieties, including a comprehensive range of premium
wine
brands, and has 5 of the top-selling 20 wine brands and is the largest producer
of cask (box) wines.
Constellation
Wines’ well-known wine brands include Robert Mondavi Winery, Simi, Franciscan
Oakville Estate, Estancia, Ravenswood, Blackstone, Robert Mondavi Private
Selection, Ruffino, Alice White, Nobilo, Hardys, Woodbridge by Robert Mondavi,
Vendange, Arbor Mist, Almaden, and Stowells.
Constellation
Wines is also the leading independent beverage wholesaler to the on-premise
trade in the United Kingdom and has more than 20,000 on-premise accounts. The
wholesaling business involves the distribution of wine, distilled spirits,
cider, beer, RTDs and soft drinks. These products include Constellation Wines’
branded wine, cider and water products, and products produced by other major
drinks companies.
Constellation
Wines is also the second largest producer and marketer of cider in the United
Kingdom, with leading cider brands Blackthorn and Gaymer’s Olde English, and
produces and markets Strathmore, the leading bottled water brand in the United
Kingdom on-premise market.
In
conjunction with its wine production, Constellation Wines produces and sells
bulk wine and other related products and services.
5
Constellation
Beers and Spirits
Constellation
Beers and Spirits imports and markets a diversified line of beer and produces,
bottles, imports and markets a diversified line of distilled spirits. It is
the
largest marketer of imported beer in 25 primarily western U.S. states, where
it
has exclusive rights to distribute the Mexican brands in its portfolio, Corona
Extra, Corona Light, Modelo Especial, Pacifico, and Negra Modelo. Constellation
Beers and Spirits has exclusive distribution rights to the entire United States
for the St. Pauli Girl brand, the number two selling German Beer, and Tsingtao
brand, the number one selling Chinese Beer. All of the segments’ Mexican brands
and St. Pauli Girl brand are
among
the top-selling 20 imported beer brands in the United States. Corona Extra
is
the best selling imported beer in the United States and the sixth best selling
beer overall in the United States.
Constellation
Beers and Spirits is a leading producer and marketer of distilled spirits in
the
United States. The majority of the segment’s distilled spirits unit volume
consists of products marketed in the value and mid-premium priced category.
Principal distilled spirits brands include Black Velvet, Barton, Sköl,
Fleischmann’s, Canadian LTD, Montezuma, Ten High, Chi-Chi’s prepared cocktails,
Mr. Boston, Inver House, and Monte Alban. The
segment is continuing efforts to increase its premium spirits offerings, with
brands that include Black Velvet Reserve, the 99 Schnapps family, Effen Vodka,
Ridgemont Reserve 1792, Meukow Cognac and Cocktails by Jenn.
Constellation
Beers and Spirits also sells bulk distilled spirits and other related products
and services.
Corporate
Operations and Other
The
Corporate Operations and Other segment includes traditional corporate-related
items including
executive management, corporate development, corporate finance, human resources,
internal audit, investor relations, legal, public relations, global information
technology and global strategic sourcing.
Marketing
and Distribution
The
Company employs full-time, in-house marketing, sales and customer service
organizations within its segments to maintain a high degree of focus on each
of
its product categories. The organizations use a range of marketing strategies
and tactics to build brand equity and increase sales, including market research,
consumer and trade advertising, price promotions, point-of-sale materials,
event
sponsorship, on-premise
promotions and public relations. Where opportunities exist, particularly with
national accounts, the Company leverages its sales and marketing skills across
the organization and categories.
In
North
America, the Company’s products are primarily distributed by approximately 700
wholesale distributors as well as state and provincial alcoholic beverage
control agencies. As is the case with all other beverage alcohol companies,
products sold through state or provincial alcoholic beverage control agencies
are subject to obtaining and maintaining listings to sell the Company’s products
in that agency’s state or province. State and provincial governments can affect
prices paid by consumers of the Company’s products. This is possible either
through the imposition of taxes or, in states and provinces in which the
government acts as the distributor of the Company’s products through an
alcoholic beverage control agency, by directly setting retail prices for the
Company’s products.
6
In
the
United Kingdom the Company’s products are distributed either directly to
retailers or through wholesalers and importers. The Company’s U.K. wholesaling
business sells and distributes the Company’s branded products and those of other
major drinks companies to on-premise locations through a network of depots
located throughout the United Kingdom. In Australasia and other markets,
the
Company’s products are primarily distributed either directly to retailers or
through wholesalers and importers. In the United Kingdom and Australasia,
the
distribution channels are dominated by a small number of industry
leaders.
Trademarks
and Distribution Agreements
Trademarks
are an important aspect of the Company’s business. The Company sells its
products under a number of trademarks, which the Company owns or uses under
license. Throughout its segments, the Company also has various licenses and
distribution agreements for the sale, or the production and sale of its products
and products of third parties. These licenses and distribution agreements
have
varying terms and durations. Agreements include, among others, a long-term
license agreement with Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc., which expires in 2116, for
the Ten High, Crystal Palace, Northern Light, Lauder’s and Imperial Spirits
brands, and a long-term license agreement with Chi-Chi’s, Inc., which expires in
2117, for the production, marketing and sale of beverage products, alcoholic
and
non-alcoholic, utilizing the Chi-Chi’s brand name.
All
of
the Company’s imported beer products are marketed and sold pursuant to exclusive
distribution agreements with the suppliers of these products. These agreements
have terms that vary and prohibit the Company from importing other beer from
other producers from the same country. The Company’s agreement to distribute
Corona Extra and other Mexican beer brands exclusively throughout 25 primarily
western U.S. states expires in December 2006 and, subject to compliance with
certain performance criteria, continued retention of certain Company personnel
and other terms under the agreement, will be automatically renewed for
additional terms of five years. Changes in control of the Company or of its
subsidiaries involved in importing the Mexican beer brands, changes in the
position of the Chief Executive Officer of Barton Beers, Ltd., including
by
death or disability, or the termination of the President of Barton Incorporated,
may be a basis for the supplier, unless it consents to such changes, to
terminate the agreement. The supplier’s consent to such changes may not be
unreasonably withheld. Prior to their expiration, all of the Company’s imported
beer distribution agreements may be terminated if the Company fails to meet
certain performance criteria. The Company believes it is currently in compliance
with its material imported beer distribution agreements. From time to time,
the
Company has failed, and may in the future fail, to satisfy certain performance
criteria in its distribution agreements. Although there can be no assurance
that
the Company’s material beer distribution agreements will be renewed, given the
Company’s long-term relationships with its suppliers, the Company expects that
such agreements will be renewed prior to their expiration and does not believe
that these agreements will be terminated.
Competition
The
beverage alcohol industry is highly competitive. The Company competes on
the
basis of quality, price, brand recognition and distribution strength. The
Company’s beverage alcohol products compete with other alcoholic and
non-alcoholic beverages for consumer purchases, as well as shelf space in
retail
stores, restaurant presence and wholesaler attention. The Company competes
with
numerous multinational producers and distributors of beverage alcohol products,
some of which may have greater resources than the Company.
7
Constellation
Wines’ principal wine competitors include: E & J Gallo Winery, The Wine
Group, Foster’s Group, and Kendall-Jackson in the United States; Diageo, E &
J Gallo Winery, Pernod Ricard and Foster’s Group in the United Kingdom; and
Foster’s Group and Pernod Ricard in Australia. Its U.K. wholesale business
competes with major brewers who also have wholesale operations, in particular,
Scottish and Newcastle UK, Molson
Coors,
InBev
and Carlsberg UK, and other independent national and regional wholesalers.
Constellation Wines’ principal cider competitor is Scottish and Newcastle
UK.
Constellation
Beers and Spirits’ principal competitors include: Heineken, InBev, Molson
Coors,
and
Diageo in the imported beer category as well as domestic producers such as
Anheuser-Busch, Molson
Coors
and
SABMiller; and Diageo, Fortune Brands, Bacardi, Pernod
Ricard and
Brown-Forman in the distilled spirits category.
Production
In
the
United States, the Company operates 19 wineries where wine is produced from
many
varieties of grapes grown principally in the Napa, Sonoma, Monterey and San
Joaquin regions of California. In Australia, the Company operates 10 wineries
where wine is produced from many varieties of grapes grown in most of the
major
viticultural regions. Grapes are crushed at most of the Company’s wineries and
stored as wine until packaged for sale under the Company’s brand names or sold
in bulk. In the United States, the Company’s inventories of wine are usually at
their highest levels in September through November during and after the crush
of
each year’s grape harvest, and are reduced prior to the subsequent year’s crush.
Similarly, in Australia, the Company’s inventories of wine are usually at their
highest levels in March through May during and after the crush of each year’s
grape harvest, and are reduced prior to the subsequent year’s crush. The Company
also operates one winery in Chile and three wineries in New
Zealand.
The
Company has seven facilities for the production and bottling of its distilled
spirits products. The bourbon whiskeys and domestic blended whiskeys marketed
by
the Company are primarily produced and aged by the Company at its distillery
in
Bardstown, Kentucky. The Company’s primary distilled spirits bottling facility
in the United States is in Owensboro, Kentucky. The majority of the Company’s
Canadian whisky requirements are produced and aged at its Canadian distilleries
in Lethbridge, Alberta, and Valleyfield, Quebec. The Company’s requirements of
Scotch whisky, tequila, mezcal and the neutral grain spirits it uses in the
production of gin, vodka and other spirits products, are primarily purchased
from various suppliers.
The
Company operates
three facilities in the United Kingdom that produce, bottle and package wine,
cider and water. To produce Stowells, wine is imported in bulk from various
countries and packaged at the Company’s facility at Bristol, England.
The
Bristol facility also produces fortified British wine and wine style drinks.
All
cider production takes place at the Company’s facility at Shepton Mallet,
England. The Strathmore brand of bottled water is sourced and bottled in
Forfar,
Scotland.
Sources
and Availability of Production Materials
The
principal components in the production of the Company’s branded beverage alcohol
products are agricultural products, such as grapes and grain, and packaging
materials (primarily glass).
Most
of
the Company’s annual grape requirements are satisfied by purchases from each
year’s harvest which normally begins in August and runs through October in the
United States and begins in February and runs through May in Australia. The
Company believes that it has adequate sources of grape supplies to meet its
sales expectations. However, in the event that demand for certain wine products
exceed expectations, the Company would seek to source the extra requirements
from the bulk wine markets, but could experience shortages.
8
The
Company receives grapes from approximately 1,100 independent growers in the
United States and 1,500 growers in Australia. The Company enters into written
purchase agreements with a majority of these growers and pricing generally
varies year-to-year and generally based on then-current market prices. In
Australia, approximately 700 of the 1,500 growers belong to a grape growers’
cooperative. The Company purchases the majority of its Australian grape
requirements from this cooperative under a long-term arrangement. In the
United
Kingdom, the Company produces wine from materials purchased either on a contract
basis or on the open market.
At
February 28, 2006, the Company owned or leased approximately 20,200
acres of
land and vineyards, either fully bearing or under development, in California
(U.S.), New York (U.S.), Australia, Chile and New Zealand. This acreage supplies
only a small percentage of the Company’s overall total wine needs. However, most
of this acreage is used to supply a large portion of the grapes used for
the
production of the Company’s super-premium and fine wines. The Company continues
to consider the purchase or lease of additional vineyards, and additional
land
for vineyard plantings, to supplement its grape supply.
The
distilled spirits manufactured by the Company require various agricultural
products, neutral grain spirits and bulk spirits. The Company fulfills its
requirements through purchases from various sources by contractual arrangement
and through purchases on the open market. The Company believes that adequate
supplies of the aforementioned products are available at the present
time.
In
the
United Kingdom, the Company sources apples for cider production primarily
through long-term supply arrangements with owners of apple orchards. The
Company
believes there are adequate supplies of apples at this particular
time.
The
Company utilizes glass and polyethylene terephthalate (“PET”) bottles and other
materials such as caps, corks, capsules, labels, wine bags and cardboard
cartons
in the bottling and packaging of its products. Glass bottle costs are one
of the
largest components of the Company’s cost of product sold. In the United States
and Australia, the glass bottle industry is highly concentrated with only
a
small number of producers. The Company has traditionally obtained, and continues
to obtain, its glass requirements from a limited number of producers under
long-term supply arrangements. Currently, most of the Company’s glass
container requirements for its United States operations are supplied by one
producer and substantially all of the Company’s glass container
requirements for its Australian operations are supplied by another producer.
The
Company has not experienced difficulty in satisfying its requirements with
respect to any of the foregoing and considers its sources of supply to be
adequate. However, the inability of any of the Company’s glass bottle suppliers
to satisfy the Company’s requirements could adversely affect the Company’s
operations.
Government
Regulation
The
Company is subject to a range of regulations in the countries in which it
operates. Where it produces products, the Company is subject to environmental
laws and regulations and may be required to obtain permits and licenses to
operate its facilities. Where it markets and sells products, it may be subject
to laws and regulations on trademark and brand registration, packaging and
labeling, distribution methods and relationships, pricing and price changes,
sales promotions, advertising and public relations. The Company is also subject
to rules and regulations relating to changes in officers or directors, ownership
or control.
9
The
Company believes it is in compliance in all material respects with all
applicable governmental laws and regulations in the countries in which it
operates. The Company also believes that the cost of administration and
compliance with, and liability under, such laws and regulations does not
have,
and is not expected to have, a material adverse impact on its financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Seasonality
The
beverage alcohol industry is subject to seasonality in each major category.
As a
result, in response to wholesaler and retailer demand which precedes consumer
purchases, the Company’s wine and spirits sales are typically highest during the
third quarter of its fiscal year, primarily due to seasonal holiday buying,
and
its imported beer sales are typically highest during the first and second
quarters of the Company’s fiscal year, which correspond to the Spring and Summer
periods in the United States.
Employees
As
of the
end of March 2006, the Company had approximately 7,900
full-time employees throughout the world. Approximately 3,700
full-time employees were in the United States and approximately 4,200
full-time employees were outside of the United States, in countries including
Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand. Additional workers
may be
employed by the Company during the peak and grape crushing seasons. The Company
considers its employee relations generally to be good.
Common
Stock Splits
During
April 2005, the Board of Directors of the Company approved two-for-one stock
splits of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, which
were distributed in the form of stock dividends on May 13, 2005, to stockholders
of record on April 29, 2005. Pursuant to the terms of the stock dividends,
each
holder of Class A Common Stock received one additional share of Class A stock
for each share of Class A stock held, and each holder of Class B Common Stock
received one additional share of Class B stock for each share of Class B
stock
held. Share
and
per share amounts have been retroactively restated to give effect to these
common stock splits.
Company
Information
The
Company’s internet address is http://www.cbrands.com. The Company’s filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including its annual report on
Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and
amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a)
or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are accessible free of charge
at
http://www.cbrands.com as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company
electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC. The
SEC
maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information
statements, and other information regarding issuers, such as the Company,
that
file electronically with the SEC. The internet address of the SEC’s site is
http://www.sec.gov. Also, the public may read and copy any materials that
the
Company files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street,
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation
of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
The
Company has adopted a Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Executive
Code of Ethics that specifically applies to its chief executive officer,
its
principal financial officer, and controller. This Chief Executive Officer
and
Senior Financial Executive Code of Ethics meets the requirements as set forth
in
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Item 406 of Regulation S-K. The Company
has
posted on its internet website a copy of the Chief Executive Officer and
Senior
Financial Officer Code of Ethics. It is accessible at
http://www.cbrands.com/CBI/investors.htm.
10
The
Company also has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies
to
all employees, directors and officers, including each person who is subject
to
the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Executive Code of Ethics.
The
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is also available on the Company’s internet
website, together with its Global Code of Responsible Practices for Beverage
Alcohol Advertising and Marketing, its Board of Directors Corporate Governance
Guidelines and the Charters of the Board’s Audit Committee, Human Resources
Committee (which serves as the Board’s compensation committee) and Corporate
Governance Committee (which serves as the Board’s nominating committee). These
materials are accessible at http://www.cbrands.com/CBI/investors.htm.
Additionally, amendments to, and waivers granted to the Company’s directors and
executive officers under the Company’s codes of ethics, if any, will be posted
in this area of the Company’s website. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics, Global Code of Responsible Practices for Beverage Alcohol
Advertising and Marketing, Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial
Executive Code of Ethics, and/or the Board of Directors Corporate Governance
Guidelines and committee charters are available in print to any shareholder
who
requests it. Shareholders should direct such requests in writing to Investor
Relations Department, Constellation Brands, Inc., 370 Woodcliff Drive, Suite
300, Fairport, New York 14450 or by telephoning the Company’s Investor Center at
1-888-922-2150.
The
foregoing information regarding the Company’s website and its content is for
your convenience only. The content of the Company’s website is not deemed to be
incorporated by reference in this report or filed with the SEC.
Item
1A.
Risk
Factors
In
addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully
consider the following factors which could materially affect our business,
financial condition or results of operations. The risks described below are
not
the only risks we face. Additional factors not presently known to us or that
we
currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our
business operations.
Our
indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our financial
health.
We
have
incurred substantial indebtedness to finance our acquisitions. In the future,
we
may incur substantial additional indebtedness to finance further acquisitions
or
for other purposes. Our ability to satisfy our debt obligations outstanding
from
time to time will depend upon our future operating performance. We do not
have
complete control over our future operating performance because it is subject
to
prevailing economic conditions, levels of interest rates and financial, business
and other factors. We cannot assure you that our business will generate
sufficient cash flow from operations to meet all of our debt service
requirements and to fund our capital expenditure requirements.
Our
current and future debt service obligations and covenants could have important
consequences to you. These consequences include, or may include, the
following:
· |
Our
ability to obtain financing for future working capital needs or
acquisitions or other purposes may be
limited;
|
· |
Our
funds available for operations, expansion or distributions will be
reduced
because we will dedicate a significant portion of our cash flow from
operations to the payment of
principal and interest on Our indebtedness and dividends on our Series
A
mandatory convertible preferred stock;
|
· |
Our
ability to conduct our business could be limited by restrictive covenants;
and
|
· |
Our
vulnerability to adverse economic conditions may be greater than
less
leveraged competitors and, thus, our ability to withstand competitive
pressures may be limited.
|
11
Our
senior credit facility and the indentures under which our debt securities
have
been issued contain restrictive covenants and provisions. These covenants
and
provisions affect our ability to grant additional liens, incur additional
debt,
sell assets, engage in changes of control, pay dividends, enter into
transactions with affiliates, make investments and engage in certain other
fundamental changes. Our senior credit facility also contains restrictions
on
our ability to make acquisitions and certain financial ratio tests, including
a
debt coverage ratio, a senior debt coverage ratio, a fixed charges ratio
and an
interest coverage ratio. These restrictions could limit our ability to conduct
business. If we fail to comply with the obligations contained in the senior
credit facility, our existing or future indentures or other loan agreements,
we
could be in default under such agreements, which could require us to immediately
repay the related debt and also debt under other agreements that may contain
cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions.
Our
acquisition and joint venture strategies may not be
successful.
We
have
made a number of acquisitions, and we anticipate that we may, from time to
time,
acquire additional businesses, assets or securities of companies that we
believe
would provide a strategic fit with our business. We will need to integrate
acquired businesses with our existing operations. We cannot assure you that
we
will effectively assimilate the business or product offerings of acquired
companies into our business or product offerings. Integrating the operations
and
personnel of acquired companies into our existing operations may result in
difficulties and expense, disrupt our business or divert management’s time and
attention. Acquisitions involve numerous other risks, including potential
exposure to unknown liabilities of acquired companies and the possible loss
of
key employees and customers of the acquired business.
In
connection with acquisitions or joint venture investments outside the United
States, we may enter into derivative contracts to purchase foreign currency
in
order to hedge against the risk of foreign currency fluctuations in connection
with such acquisitions or joint venture investments, which subjects us to
the
risk of foreign currency fluctuations associated with such derivative
contracts.
We
have
entered into joint ventures and may enter into additional joint ventures.
We
share control of our joint ventures. Our joint venture partners may at any
time
have economic, business or legal interests or goals that are inconsistent
with
ours or the joint venture’s. In addition, our joint venture partners may be
unable to meet their economic or other obligations and we may be required
to
fulfill those obligations alone. Our failure or the failure of an entity
in
which we have a joint venture interest to adequately manage the risks associated
with any acquisitions or joint ventures could have a material adverse effect
on
our financial condition or results of operations. There can be no assurance
that
any of our acquisitions or joint ventures will be profitable.
Competition
could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We
are in
a highly competitive industry and the dollar amount and unit volume of our
sales
could be negatively affected by our inability to maintain or increase prices,
changes in geographic or product mix, a general decline in beverage alcohol
consumption or the decision of wholesalers, retailers or consumers to purchase
competitive products instead of our products. Wholesaler, retailer and consumer
purchasing decisions are influenced by, among other things, the perceived
absolute or relative overall value of our products, including their quality
or
pricing, compared to competitive products. Unit volume and dollar sales could
also be affected by pricing, purchasing, financing, operational, advertising
or
promotional decisions made by wholesalers, state and provincial agencies,
and
retailers which could affect their supply of, or consumer demand for, our
products. We could also experience higher than expected selling, general
and
administrative expenses if we find it necessary to increase the number of
our
personnel or our advertising or promotional expenditures to maintain our
competitive position or for other reasons.
12
An
increase in excise taxes or government regulations could have a material
adverse
effect on our business.
The
United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and other countries in which
we
operate impose excise and other taxes on beverage alcohol products in varying
amounts which have been subject to change. Significant increases in excise
or
other taxes on beverage alcohol products could materially and adversely affect
our financial condition or results of operations. Recently, many U.S. states
have considered proposals to increase, and some of these states have increased,
state alcohol excise taxes. In addition, federal, state, local and foreign
governmental agencies extensively regulate the beverage alcohol products
industry concerning such matters as licensing, trade and pricing practices,
permitted and required labeling, advertising and relations with wholesalers
and
retailers. Certain federal and state regulations also require warning labels
and
signage. New or revised regulations or increased licensing fees, requirements
or
taxes could also have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
or
results of operations.
We
rely on the performance of wholesale distributors, major retailers and chains
for the success of our business.
In
the
United States, we sell our products principally to wholesalers for resale
to
retail outlets including grocery stores, package liquor stores, club and
discount stores and restaurants. In the United Kingdom and Australia, we
sell
our products principally to wholesalers and directly to major retailers and
chains. The replacement or poor performance of our major wholesalers, retailers
or chains could materially and adversely affect our results of operations
and
financial condition. Our inability to collect accounts receivable from our
major
wholesalers, retailers or chains could also materially and adversely affect
our
results of operations and financial condition.
The
industry is being affected by the trend toward consolidation in the wholesale
and retail distribution channels, particularly in Europe and the United States.
If we are unable to successfully adapt to this changing environment, our
net
income, share of sales and volume growth could be negatively affected.
In
addition, wholesalers and retailers of our products offer products which
compete
directly with our products for retail shelf space and consumer purchases.
Accordingly, wholesalers or retailers may give higher priority to products
of
our competitors. In the future, our wholesalers and retailers may not continue
to purchase our products or provide our products with adequate levels of
promotional support.
Our
business could be adversely affected by a decline in the consumption of products
we sell.
Since
1995, there have been modest increases in consumption of beverage alcohol
in
most of our product categories and geographic markets. There have been periods
in the past, however, in which there were substantial declines in the overall
per capita consumption of beverage alcohol products in the United States
and
other markets in which we participate. A limited or general decline in
consumption in one or more of our product categories could occur in the future
due to a variety of factors, including:
· |
A general
decline in economic conditions;
|
· |
Increased
concern about the health consequences of consuming beverage alcohol
products and about drinking and driving;
|
· |
A trend
toward a healthier diet including lighter, lower calorie beverages
such as
diet soft drinks, juices and water
products;
|
· |
The
increased activity of anti-alcohol groups;
and
|
· |
Increased
federal, state or foreign excise or other taxes on beverage alcohol
products.
|
13
In
addition, our continued success depends, in part, on our ability to develop
new
products. The launch and ongoing success of new products are inherently
uncertain especially with regard to their appeal to consumers. The launch
of a
new product can give rise to a variety of costs and an unsuccessful launch,
among other things, can affect consumer perception of existing
brands.
We
generally purchase raw materials under short-term supply contracts, and we
are
subject to substantial price fluctuations for grapes and grape-related
materials, and we have a limited group of suppliers of glass
bottles.
Our
business is heavily dependent upon raw materials, such as grapes, grape juice
concentrate, grains, alcohol and packaging materials from third-party suppliers.
We could experience raw material supply, production or shipment difficulties
that could adversely affect our ability to supply goods to our customers.
Increases in the costs of raw materials also directly affect us. In the past,
we
have experienced dramatic increases in the cost of grapes. Although we believe
we have adequate sources of grape supplies, in the event demand for certain
wine
products exceed expectations, we could experience shortages.
The
wine
industry swings between cycles of grape oversupply and undersupply. In a
severe
oversupply environment, the ability of wine producers, including ourselves,
to
raise prices is limited, and, in certain situations, the competitive environment
may put pressure on producers to lower prices. Further, although an oversupply
may enhance opportunities to purchase grapes at lower costs, a producer’s
selling and promotional expenses associated with the sale of its wine products
can rise in such an environment.
Glass
bottle costs are one of our largest components of cost of product sold. In
the United States and Australia, glass bottles have only a small number of
producers. Currently, one producer supplies most of our glass container
requirements for our United States operations and another producer supplies
substantially all of our glass container requirements for our Australian
operations. The inability of any of our glass bottle suppliers to satisfy
our
requirements could adversely affect our business.
Our
operations subject us to risks relating to currency rate fluctuations, interest
rate fluctuations and geopolitical uncertainty which could have a material
adverse effect on our business.
We
have
operations in different countries throughout the world and, therefore, are
subject to risks associated with currency fluctuations. Subsequent to the
Hardy
Acquisition, our exposure to foreign currency risk increased significantly
as a
result of having additional international operations in Australia, New Zealand
and the United Kingdom. We are also exposed to risks associated with interest
rate fluctuations. We manage our exposure to foreign currency and interest
rate
risks utilizing derivative instruments and other means to reduce those risks.
We, however, could experience changes in our ability to hedge against or
manage
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates or interest rates and,
accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in reducing
those risks. We could also be affected by nationalizations or unstable
governments or legal systems or intergovernmental disputes. These currency,
economic and political uncertainties may have a material adverse effect on
our
results of operations, especially to the extent these matters, or the decisions,
policies or economic strength of our suppliers, affect our global
operations.
14
We
have a material amount of goodwill, and if we are required to write-down
goodwill, it would reduce our net income, which in turn could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations.
As
of
February 28, 2006, goodwill represented $2,193.6 million, or 29.6% of our
total
assets. Goodwill is the amount by which the costs of an acquisition accounted
for using the purchase method exceeds the fair value of the net assets acquired.
We adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets,” in its entirety, on March 1, 2002. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill is no
longer amortized, but instead is subject to a periodic impairment evaluation
based on the fair value of the reporting unit. Reductions in our net income
caused by the write-down of goodwill could materially and adversely affect
our
results of operations.
The
termination or non-renewal of our imported beer distribution agreements could
have a material adverse effect on our business.
We
market
and sell all of our imported beer products pursuant to exclusive distribution
agreements with the suppliers of these products that are subject to renewal
from
time to time. Our agreement to distribute Corona Extra and our other Mexican
beer brands in 25 primarily western U.S. states expires in December 2006
and,
subject to compliance with certain performance criteria, continued retention
of
certain personnel and other terms of the agreement, will be automatically
renewed for additional terms of five years. Changes in control of us or our
subsidiaries involved in importing the Mexican beer brands, or changes in
the
chief executive officer of such subsidiaries, may be a basis for the supplier,
unless it consents to such changes, to terminate the agreement. The supplier’s
consent to such changes may not be unreasonably withheld. Prior to their
expiration, all of our imported beer distribution agreements may be terminated
if we fail to meet certain performance criteria. We believe that we are
currently in compliance with all of our material imported beer distribution
agreements. From time to time we have failed, and may in the future fail,
to
satisfy certain performance criteria in our distribution agreements. It is
possible that our beer distribution agreements may not be renewed or may
be
terminated prior to expiration.
Class
action or other litigation relating to alcohol abuse or the misuse of alcohol
could adversely affect our business.
There
has
been increased public attention directed at the beverage alcohol industry,
which
we believe is due to concern over problems related to alcohol abuse, including
drinking and driving, underage drinking and health consequences from the
misuse
of alcohol. Several beverage alcohol producers have been sued in several
courts
regarding alleged advertising practices relating to underage consumers. Adverse
developments in these or similar lawsuits or a significant decline in the
social
acceptability of beverage alcohol products that results from these lawsuits
could materially adversely affect our business.
We
depend upon our trademarks and proprietary rights, and any failure to protect
our intellectual property rights or any claims that we are infringing upon
the
rights of others may adversely affect our competitive
position.
Our
future success depends significantly on our ability to protect our current
and
future brands and products and to defend our intellectual property rights.
We
have been granted numerous trademark registrations covering our brands and
products and have filed, and expect to continue to file, trademark applications
seeking to protect newly-developed brands and products. We cannot be sure
that
trademark registrations will be issued with respect to any of our trademark
applications. There is also a risk that we could, by omission, fail to timely
renew a trademark or that our competitors will challenge, invalidate or
circumvent any existing or future trademarks issued to, or licensed by,
us.
15
Contamination
could harm the integrity or customer support for our brands and adversely affect
the sales of our products.
The
success of our brands depends upon the positive image that consumers have of
those brands. Contamination, whether arising accidentally or through deliberate
third-party action, or other events that harm the integrity or consumer support
for those brands, could adversely affect their sales. Contaminants in raw
materials purchased from third parties and used in the production of our wine
and spirits products or defects in the distillation or fermentation process
could lead to low beverage quality as well as illness among, or injury to,
consumers of our products and may result in reduced sales of the affected brand
or all of our brands.
An
increase in the cost of energy could affect our
profitability.
Recently,
we have experienced significant increases in energy costs, and energy costs
could continue to rise, which would result in higher transportation, freight
and
other operating costs. Our future operating expenses and margins will be
dependent on our ability to manage the impact of cost increases. We cannot
guarantee that we will be able to pass along increased energy costs to our
customers through increased prices.
Our
reliance upon complex information systems distributed worldwide and our reliance
upon third party global networks means we could experience interruptions to
our
business services.
We
depend
on information technology to enable us to operate efficiently and interface
with
customers, as well as maintain financial accuracy and efficiency. If we do
not
allocate, and effectively manage, the resources necessary to build and sustain
the proper technology infrastructure, we could be subject to transaction errors,
processing inefficiencies, the loss of customers, business disruptions, or
the
loss of or damage to intellectual property through security breach. As with
all
large systems, our information systems could be penetrated by outside parties
intent on extracting information, corrupting information or disrupting business
processes. Such unauthorized access could disrupt our business and could result
in the loss of assets.
Changes
in accounting standards and taxation requirements could affect our financial
results.
New
accounting standards or pronouncements that may become applicable to us from
time to time, or changes in the interpretation of existing standards and
pronouncements, could have a significant effect on our reported results for
the
affected periods. We are also subject to income tax in the numerous
jurisdictions in which we generate revenues. In addition, our products are
subject to import and excise duties and/or sales or value-added taxes in many
jurisdictions in which we operate. Increases in income tax rates could reduce
our after-tax income from affected jurisdictions, while increases in indirect
taxes could affect our products' affordability and therefore reduce our
sales.
Various
diseases, pests and certain weather conditions could affect quality and quantity
of grapes.
Various
diseases, pests, fungi, viruses, drought, frosts and certain other weather
conditions could affect the quality and quantity of grapes available, decreasing
the supply of our products and negatively impacting profitability. We cannot
guarantee that our grape suppliers will succeed in preventing contamination
in
existing vineyards or that we will succeed in preventing contamination in our
existing vineyards or future vineyards we may acquire. Future government
restrictions regarding the use of certain materials used in grape growing may
increase vineyard costs and/or reduce production. Grape growing also requires
adequate water supplies. A substantial reduction in water supplies could result
in material losses of grape crops and vines, which could lead to a shortage
of
our product supply.
16
Item
1B. Unresolved
Staff Comments
Not
Applicable.
Item
2. Properties
Through
its business segments, the Company operates wineries, distilling plants,
bottling plants, and cider and water producing facilities, most of which include
warehousing and distribution facilities on the premises. The Company also
operates separate distribution centers under the Constellation Wines segment’s
wholesaling business. In addition to the Company’s properties described below,
certain of the Company’s businesses maintain office space for sales and similar
activities and offsite warehouse and distribution facilities in a variety of
geographic locations.
The
Company believes that its facilities, taken as a whole, are in good condition
and working order and have adequate capacity to meet its needs for the
foreseeable future.
The
following discussion details the properties associated with the Company’s three
business segments.
Constellation
Wines
Through
the Constellation Wines segment, the Company maintains facilities in the United
States, Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Chile and the Republic
of
Ireland. These facilities include wineries, bottling plants, cider and water
producing facilities, warehousing and distribution facilities, distribution
centers and office facilities. The segment maintains owned and/or leased
division offices in Canandaigua, New York; St. Helena, California; Gonzales,
California; Reynella, South Australia; Bristol, England and Guildford,
England.
United
States
In
the
United States, the Company through its Constellation Wines segment operates
two
wineries in New York, located in Canandaigua and Naples; 14 wineries in
California, located in Acampo, Gonzales, Healdsburg, Kenwood, Oakville, Soledad,
Rutherford, Ukiah, two in Lodi, two in Madera and two in Sonoma; two wineries
in
Washington, located in Woodinville and Sunnyside; and one winery in Caldwell,
Idaho. All of these wineries are owned, except for the wineries in Caldwell
(Idaho) and Woodinville (Washington), which are leased. The Constellation Wines
segment considers its principal wineries in the United States to be the Mission
Bell winery in Madera (California), the Canandaigua winery in Canandaigua (New
York), the Ravenswood wineries in Sonoma (California), the Franciscan Vineyards
winery in Rutherford (California), the Woodbridge Winery in Acampo (California),
the Turner Road Vintners Winery in Lodi (California), the Robert Mondavi Winery
in Oakville (California) and the Blackstone Winery in Gonzales (California).
The
Mission Bell winery crushes grapes, produces, bottles and distributes wine
and
produces specialty concentrates and Mega Colors for sale. The Canandaigua winery
crushes grapes and produces, bottles and distributes wine. The other principal
wineries crush grapes, vinify, cellar and bottle wine.
Through
the Constellation Wines segment, as of February 28, 2006, the Company owned
or
leased approximately 10,100
acres of
vineyards, either fully bearing or under development, in California and New
York
to supply a portion of the grapes used in the production of wine.
17
Australasia
Through
the Constellation Wines segment, the Company owns and operates 10
Australian wineries, five of which are in South Australia, two in Western
Australia and the other three in New South Wales, Australian Capital Territory
and Tasmania. Additionally, through this segment the Company also owns three
wineries in New Zealand. All but one of these Australasian wineries crush
grapes, vinify and cellar wine. Five include bottling and/or packaging
operations. The facility in Reynella, South Australia bottles a significant
portion of the wine produced in Australia, produces all Australian sparkling
wines and cellars wines. The Company considers the segment’s principal
facilities in Australasia to be the Berri Estates winery located in Glossop
and
the bottling facility located in Reynella, both in South Australia.
Through
the Constellation Wines segment, the Company owns or has interests in
approximately 6,300
plantable acres of vineyards in South Australia, the Australian Capital
Territory, Western Australia, Victoria, and Tasmania, and approximately
2,500
acres of
vineyards, either fully bearing or under development, in New
Zealand.
Europe
Through
the Constellation Wines segment, in the United Kingdom the Company owns and
operates two facilities in England, located in Bristol and Shepton Mallet and
one facility in Scotland, located in Forfar. The Bristol facility is considered
a principal facility and produces, bottles and packages wine; the Shepton Mallet
facility produces, bottles and packages cider; and the Forfar facility produces,
bottles and packages water products.
Through
this segment, the Company operates a National Distribution Centre, located
at a
leased facility in Severnside, Bristol, England, together with two leased
satellite facilities within the same region, to distribute the Company’s
products that are produced at the Bristol and Shepton Mallet facilities as
well
as products imported from other wine suppliers. To support its wholesaling
business, the Company operates 11 physical distribution centers located
throughout the United Kingdom, 10 of which are leased, as well as two virtual
depots and two satellite depots. These distribution centers and depots are
used
to distribute products produced by the Company, as well as by third
parties.
Additionally,
through the Constellation Wines segment, the Company leases warehouse and office
facilities in Dublin and has contracted with a third party with respect to
a
depot in Cork in support of the Company’s business of marketing, storing and
distributing alcoholic beverages in the Republic of Ireland.
Chile
Through
the Constellation Wines segment, the Company also operates, through a majority
owned subsidiary, a winery in the Casablanca Valley, Chile, that crushes grapes
and vinifies, cellars and bottles wine. Through this segment, the Company also
owns or leases approximately 1,300
acres of
vineyards, either fully bearing or under development, in Chile for the
production of wine.
Constellation
Beers and Spirits
Through
the Constellation Beers and Spirits segment, the Company maintains leased
division offices in Chicago, Illinois. On behalf of the segment’s imported beer
business, the Company contracts with five providers of warehouse space and
services in eight locations throughout the United States.
18
Through
this segment, the Company owns and operates four distilling plants, two in
the
United States and two in Canada. The two distilling plants in the United States
are located in Bardstown, Kentucky and Albany, Georgia. The two distilling
plants in Canada are located in Valleyfield, Quebec and Lethbridge, Alberta.
The
Company considers this segment’s principal distilling plants to be the
facilities located in Bardstown (Kentucky), Valleyfield (Quebec) and Lethbridge
(Alberta). The Bardstown facility distills, bottles and warehouses distilled
spirits products for the Company and, on a contractual basis, for other industry
members. The two Canadian facilities distill, bottle and store Canadian whisky
for the segment, and distill and/or bottle and store Canadian whisky, vodka,
rum, gin and liqueurs for third parties.
In
the
United States, the Company through its Constellation Beers and Spirits segment
also operates three bottling plants, located in Atlanta, Georgia; Owensboro,
Kentucky and Carson, California. The facilities located in Atlanta (Georgia)
and
Owensboro (Kentucky) are owned, while the facility in Carson (California) is
leased. The Company considers this segment’s bottling plant located in Owensboro
to be one of the segment’s principal facilities. The Owensboro facility bottles
and warehouses distilled spirits products for the segment and is also utilized
for contract bottling.
Corporate
Operations and Other
The
Company’s corporate headquarters are located in leased offices in Fairport, New
York.
Item
3. Legal
Proceedings
In
the
course of their business, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to
litigation from time to time. Although the amount of any liability with respect
to such litigation cannot be determined, in the opinion of management, such
liability will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not
Applicable.
19
Executive
Officers of the Company
Information
with respect to the current executive officers of the Company is as
follows:
NAME
|
AGE
|
OFFICE OR POSITION HELD |
Richard
Sands
|
55
|
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
Robert
Sands
|
47
|
President
and Chief Operating Officer
|
Alexander
L. Berk
|
56
|
Chief
Executive Officer, Constellation Beers and Spirits, and President
and
Chief Executive Officer, Barton
Incorporated
|
F.
Paul Hetterich
|
43
|
Executive
Vice President, Business Development and Corporate
Strategy
|
Thomas
J. Mullin
|
54
|
Executive
Vice President and General Counsel
|
Thomas
S. Summer
|
52
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
W.
Keith Wilson
|
55
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Human Resources
Officer
|
Richard
Sands, Ph.D., is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company. He has been employed by the Company in various capacities since 1979.
He was elected Chief Executive Officer in October 1993 and has served as a
director since 1982. In September 1999, Mr. Sands was elected Chairman of the
Board. He served as Executive Vice President from 1982 to May 1986, as President
from May 1986 to December 2002 and as Chief Operating Officer from May 1986
to
October 1993. He is the brother of Robert Sands.
Robert
Sands is President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. He was appointed
to these positions in December 2002 and has served as a director since January
1990. Mr. Sands also served as Group President from April 2000 through December
2002, as Chief Executive Officer, International from December 1998 through
April
2000, as Executive Vice President from October 1993 through April 2000, as
General Counsel from June 1986 through May 2000, and as Vice President from
June
1990 through October 1993. He is the brother of Richard Sands.
Alexander
L. Berk is the Chief Executive Officer of Constellation Beers and Spirits and
the President and Chief Executive Officer of Barton Incorporated. Since 1990
and
prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer of Barton Incorporated in March 1998,
Mr. Berk was President and Chief Operating Officer of Barton Incorporated and
from 1988 to 1990, he was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Schenley
Industries. Mr. Berk has been in the beverage alcohol industry for most of
his
career, serving in various positions.
F.
Paul
Hetterich has been the Company’s Executive Vice President, Business Development
and Corporate Strategy since June 2003. From April 2001 to June 2003, Mr.
Hetterich served as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Corporate Development.
Prior to that, Mr. Hetterich held several increasingly senior positions in
the
Company’s marketing and business development groups. Mr. Hetterich has been with
the Company since 1986.
Thomas
J.
Mullin joined the Company as Executive Vice President and General Counsel in
May
2000. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Mullin served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of TD Waterhouse Bank, NA, a national banking association,
since February 2000, of CT USA, F.S.B. since September 1998, and of CT USA,
Inc.
since March 1997. He also served as Executive Vice President, Business
Development and Corporate Strategy of C.T. Financial Services, Inc. from March
1997 through February 2000. From 1985 through 1997, Mr. Mullin served as Vice
Chairman and Senior Executive Vice President of First Federal Savings and Loan
Association of Rochester, New York and from 1982 through 1985, he was a partner
in the law firm of Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock, Blaine & Huber.
20
Thomas
S.
Summer joined the Company in April l997 as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer and in April 2000 was elected Executive Vice President. From
November 1991 to April 1997, Mr. Summer served as Vice President, Treasurer
of
Cardinal Health, Inc., a large national health care services company, where
he
was responsible for directing financing strategies and treasury matters. Prior
to that, from November 1987 to November 1991, Mr. Summer held several positions
in corporate finance and international treasury with PepsiCo, Inc.
W.
Keith
Wilson joined the Company in January 2002 as Senior Vice President, Human
Resources, and in September 2002, he was elected Chief Human Resources Officer
and in April 2003 he was elected Executive Vice President. From 1999 to 2001,
Mr. Wilson served as Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources of Xerox
Engineering Systems, a subsidiary of Xerox Corporation, that engineers,
manufactures and sells hi-tech reprographics equipment and software worldwide.
From 1990 to 1999, he served in various senior human resource positions with
the
banking, marketing and real estate and relocation businesses of Prudential
Life
Insurance of America, an insurance company that also provides other financial
products.
Executive
officers of the Company are generally chosen or elected to their positions
annually and hold office until the earlier of their removal or resignation
or
until their successors are chosen and qualified.
Until
February 28, 2006, Stephen B. Millar, 62, was the Chief Executive Officer of
Constellation Wines and had held this position since the closing of the Hardy
Acquisition. Prior to the Company’s acquisition of Hardy, Mr. Millar was Hardy’s
Managing Director and had held this position since 1991. Mr. Millar currently
serves in leadership roles in a number of industry organizations. He is an
Executive Council Member, Chairman of the Audit Committee and Deputy Chairman
of
the International Trade Advisory Committee of the Winemakers’ Federation of
Australia. He also serves as the President of the Australian Wine and Brandy
Producers’ Association, as a Council Member of the South Australian Wine
Industry Council and the Australian Wine Research Institute and as a Director
of
Drink Wise Australia Limited. Effective February 28, 2006, Mr. Millar retired
from the position of Chief Executive Officer of Constellation Wines. That
position has not been filled. Mr. Millar remains in a non-executive employment
relationship with the Company.
21
PART
II
Item
5.
|
Market
for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity
Securities
|
The
Company’s Class A Common Stock (the “Class A Stock”) and Class B Common Stock
(the “Class B Stock”) trade on the New York Stock ExchangeÒ
(“NYSE”)
under the symbols STZ and STZ.B, respectively. The following tables set forth
for the periods indicated the high and low sales prices of the Class A Stock
and
the Class B Stock as reported on the NYSE.
During
April 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved two-for-one splits of the
Company’s Class A Stock and Class B Stock, which were distributed in the form of
stock dividends on May 13, 2005, to stockholders of record on April 29, 2005.
Prices in the following tables have been adjusted to give effect to these common
stock splits.
CLASS
A STOCK
|
||||
1st
Quarter
|
2nd
Quarter
|
3rd
Quarter
|
4th
Quarter
|
|
Fiscal
2005
High
Low
|
$
18.13
$
15.45
|
$
19.97
$
17.70
|
$
22.59
$
18.01
|
$
28.68
$
22.33
|
Fiscal
2006
High
Low
|
$
30.08
$
24.50
|
$
31.60
$
26.26
|
$
29.01
$
21.15
|
$
27.39
$
23.16
|
CLASS
B STOCK
|
||||
1st
Quarter
|
2nd
Quarter
|
3rd
Quarter
|
4th
Quarter
|
|
Fiscal
2005
High
Low
|
$
18.03
$
15.37
|
$
19.82
$
18.08
|
$
22.68
$
18.15
|
$
28.64
$
22.70
|
Fiscal
2006
High
Low
|
$
29.88
$
25.99
|
$
31.24
$
26.75
|
$
28.90
$
21.50
|
$
27.35
$
23.32
|
At
April
14,
2006,
the
number of holders of record of Class A Stock and Class B Stock of the Company
were 1,035 and 219, respectively.
With
respect to its common stock, the Company’s policy is to retain all of its
earnings to finance the development and expansion of its business, and the
Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock since its initial
public offering in 1973. In addition, under the terms of the Company’s senior
credit facility, the Company is currently constrained from paying cash dividends
on its common stock. Also, the indentures for the Company’s outstanding senior
notes and senior subordinated notes may restrict the payment of cash dividends
on its common stock under certain circumstances. Any indentures for debt
securities issued in the future and any credit agreements entered into in the
future may also restrict or prohibit the payment of cash dividends on common
stock. During April 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved two-for-one
stock splits of the Company’s Class A Stock and Class B Stock, which were
distributed in the form of stock dividends on May 13, 2005, to stockholders
of
record on April 29, 2005. Share and per share amounts have been retroactively
restated to give effect to these common stock splits.
22
Item
6. Selected
Financial Data
For
the Years Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
February
29,
2004
|
February
28,
2003
|
February
28,
2002
|
||||||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
$
|
5,706,925
|
$
|
5,139,863
|
$
|
4,469,270
|
$
|
3,583,082
|
$
|
3,420,213
|
||||||
Less-excise
taxes
|
(1,103,477
|
)
|
(1,052,225
|
)
|
(916,841
|
)
|
(851,470
|
)
|
(813,455
|
)
|
||||||
Net
sales
|
4,603,448
|
4,087,638
|
3,552,429
|
2,731,612
|
2,606,758
|
|||||||||||
Cost
of product sold
|
(3,278,859
|
)
|
(2,947,049
|
)
|
(2,576,641
|
)
|
(1,970,897
|
)
|
(1,911,598
|
)
|
||||||
Gross
profit
|
1,324,589
|
1,140,589
|
975,788
|
760,715
|
695,160
|
|||||||||||
Selling,
general and
administrative
expenses(1)
|
(612,404
|
)
|
(555,694
|
)
|
(457,277
|
)
|
(350,993
|
)
|
(355,269
|
)
|
||||||
Acquisition-related
integration
costs(2)
|
(16,788
|
)
|
(9,421
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Restructuring
and
related
charges(3)
|
(29,282
|
)
|
(7,578
|
)
|
(31,154
|
)
|
(4,764
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Operating
income
|
666,115
|
567,896
|
487,357
|
404,958
|
339,891
|
|||||||||||
Gain
on change in fair value of
derivative
instruments
|
-
|
-
|
1,181
|
23,129
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Equity
in earnings of equity
method
investees
|
825
|
1,753
|
542
|
12,236
|
1,667
|
|||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(189,682
|
)
|
(137,675
|
)
|
(144,683
|
)
|
(105,387
|
)
|
(114,189
|
)
|
||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
477,258
|
431,974
|
344,397
|
334,936
|
227,369
|
|||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes(1)
|
(151,996
|
)
|
(155,510
|
)
|
(123,983
|
)
|
(131,630
|
)
|
(90,948
|
)
|
||||||
Net
income
|
325,262
|
276,464
|
220,414
|
203,306
|
136,421
|
|||||||||||
Dividends
on preferred stock
|
(9,804
|
)
|
(9,804
|
)
|
(5,746
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||
Income
available to common
stockholders
|
$
|
315,458
|
$
|
266,660
|
$
|
214,668
|
$
|
203,306
|
$
|
136,421
|
||||||
Earnings
per common share(4):
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
- Class A Common
Stock(5)
|
$
|
1.44
|
$
|
1.25
|
$
|
1.08
|
$
|
1.15
|
$
|
0.81
|
||||||
Basic
- Class B Common
Stock(5)
|
$
|
1.31
|
$
|
1.14
|
$
|
0.98
|
$
|
1.04
|
$
|
0.73
|
||||||
Diluted
|
$
|
1.36
|
$
|
1.19
|
$
|
1.03
|
$
|
1.10
|
$
|
0.78
|
||||||
Supplemental
data restated for effect of SFAS No. 142:
|
||||||||||||||||
Adjusted
operating income
|
$
|
666,115
|
$
|
567,896
|
$
|
487,357
|
$
|
404,958
|
$
|
369,780
|
||||||
Adjusted
net income
|
$
|
325,262
|
$
|
276,464
|
$
|
220,414
|
$
|
203,306
|
$
|
155,367
|
||||||
Adjusted
income available
to
common stockholders
|
$
|
315,458
|
$
|
266,660
|
$
|
214,668
|
$
|
203,306
|
$
|
155,367
|
||||||
Adjusted
earnings per common share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
- Class A Common
Stock(5)
|
$
|
1.44
|
$
|
1.25
|
$
|
1.08
|
$
|
1.15
|
$
|
0.92
|
||||||
Basic
- Class B Common
Stock(5)
|
$
|
1.31
|
$
|
1.14
|
$
|
0.98
|
$
|
1.04
|
$
|
0.84
|
||||||
Diluted
|
$
|
1.36
|
$
|
1.19
|
$
|
1.03
|
$
|
1.10
|
$
|
0.88
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
7,400,554
|
$
|
7,804,172
|
$
|
5,558,673
|
$
|
3,196,330
|
$
|
3,069,385
|
||||||
Long-term
debt, including
current
maturities
|
$
|
2,729,846
|
$
|
3,272,801
|
$
|
2,046,098
|
$
|
1,262,895
|
$
|
1,374,792
|
23
(1)
|
Effective
March 1, 2003, the Company completed its adoption of Statement
of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 145 (“SFAS No. 145”), “Rescission of
FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 13, and
Technical Corrections.” Accordingly, the adoption of the provisions
rescinding Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 4 (“SFAS No.
4”), “Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt,” resulted in
a reclassification of the extraordinary loss related to the extinguishment
of debt recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 ($1.6 million,
net
of income taxes), by increasing selling, general and administrative
expenses ($2.6 million) and decreasing the provision for income
taxes
($1.0 million).
|
(2)
|
For
a detailed discussion of acquisition-related integration costs
for the
years ended February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005, see Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
under Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption
“Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005 - Acquisition-Related Integration
Costs” and
“Fiscal 2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004 - Acquisition-Related Integration
Costs,” respectively.
|
(3)
|
For
a detailed discussion of restructuring and related charges for
the years
ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004,
see
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations under Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under
the
captions “Fiscal 2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005 - Restructuring and Related
Charges” and “Fiscal 2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004 - Restructuring and
Related Charges,” respectively.
|
(4)
|
All
per share data have been adjusted to give effect to the two-for-one
splits
of the Company’s two classes of common stock, which were distributed in
the form of stock dividends in May
2005.
|
(5)
|
Effective
June 1, 2004, the Company adopted EITF Issue No. 03-6 (“EITF No. 03-6”),
“Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement
No. 128.” EITF No. 03-6 clarifies what is meant by a “participating
security,” provides guidance on applying the two-class method for
computing earnings per share, and required affected companies to
retroactively restate earnings per share amounts for all periods
presented. Under EITF No. 03-6, the Company’s Class B Convertible Common
Stock is considered a participating security requiring the use
of the
two-class method for the computation of earnings per common share
- basic,
rather than the if-converted method which was previously used.
Accordingly, earnings per common share - basic reflects the application
of
EITF No. 03-6 and has been computed using the two-class method
for all
periods presented.
|
For
the
years ended February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005, see Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
under
Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Consolidated Financial
Statements and notes thereto under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Effective
March 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142 (“SFAS No. 142”), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 142
addresses financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other
intangible assets and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.
17,
“Intangible Assets.” Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and indefinite lived
intangible assets are no longer amortized but are reviewed at least annually
for
impairment. Intangible assets that are not deemed to have an indefinite life
will continue to be amortized over their useful lives and are subject to
review
for impairment. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company determined that
certain of its intangible assets met the criteria to be considered indefinite
lived and, accordingly, ceased their amortization effective March 1, 2002.
These
intangible assets consisted principally of trademarks. The Company’s trademarks
relate to well established brands owned by the Company which were previously
amortized over 40 years. Intangible assets determined to have a finite life,
primarily distribution agreements, continue to be amortized over their estimated
useful lives which were not modified as a result of adopting SFAS No. 142.
The
supplemental data section above presents operating income, income before
extraordinary item, net income and earnings per share information for the
comparative periods as if the nonamortization provisions of SFAS No. 142
had
been applied as of March 1, 2001.
24
Item
7. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Overview
The
Company is a leading international producer and marketer of beverage alcohol
brands with a broad portfolio across the wine, imported beer and spirits
categories. The Company has the largest wine business in the world and is
the
largest multi-category supplier of beverage alcohol in the United States
(“U.S.”); a leading producer and exporter of wine from Australia and New
Zealand; and both a major producer and independent drinks wholesaler in the
United Kingdom (“U.K.”).
The
Company reports its operating results in three segments: Constellation Wines
(branded wines, and U.K. wholesale and other), Constellation Beers and Spirits
(imported beers and distilled spirits) and Corporate Operations and Other.
Amounts included in the Corporate Operations and Other segment consist of
general corporate administration and finance expenses. These amounts include
costs of executive management, corporate development, corporate finance,
human
resources, internal audit, investor relations, legal, public relations,
global
information technology and global strategic sourcing.
Any
costs incurred at the corporate office that are applicable to the segments
are
allocated to the appropriate segment. The amounts included in the Corporate
Operations and Other segment are general costs that are applicable to the
consolidated group and are therefore not allocated to the other reportable
segments. All costs reported within the Corporate Operations and Other segment
are not included in the chief operating decision maker’s evaluation of the
operating income performance of the other operating segments. The business
segments reflect how the Company’s operations are being managed, how operating
performance within the Company is being evaluated by senior management and
the
structure of its internal financial reporting. In addition, the Company excludes
acquisition-related integration costs, restructuring and related charges
and
unusual items that affect comparability from its definition of operating
income
for segment purposes.
The
Company’s business strategy is to remain focused across the beverage alcohol
industry by offering a broad range of products in each of the Company’s three
major categories: wine, imported beer and spirits. The Company intends to
keep
its portfolio positioned for superior top-line growth while maximizing the
profitability of its brands. In addition, the Company seeks to increase its
relative importance to key customers in major markets by increasing its share
of
their overall purchasing, which is increasingly important in a consolidating
industry. The Company’s strategy of breadth across categories and geographies is
designed to deliver long-term profitable growth. This strategy allows the
Company more investment choices, provides flexibility to address changing
market
conditions and creates stronger routes-to-market.
Marketing,
sales and distribution of the Company’s products, particularly the Constellation
Wines segment’s products, are managed on a geographic basis in order to fully
leverage leading market positions within each geographic market. Market dynamics
and consumer trends vary significantly across the Company’s three core
geographic markets - North America (primarily the U.S.), Europe (primarily
the
U.K.) and Australasia (primarily Australia and New Zealand). Within the U.S.
market, the Company offers a wide range of beverage alcohol products across
the
Constellation Wines segment and the Constellation Beers and Spirits segment.
In
Europe, the Company leverages its position as the largest wine supplier in
the
U.K. In addition, the Company leverages its U.K. wholesale business as a
strategic route-to-market for its imported wine portfolio and as a key supplier
of a full range of beverage alcohol products primarily to large national
on-premise accounts. Within Australasia, where consumer trends favor domestic
wine products, the Company leverages its position as one of the largest wine
producers in Australia.
25
The
Company remains committed to its long-term financial model of growing sales
(both through acquisitions and organically), expanding margins and increasing
cash flow to achieve superior earnings per share growth and improve return
on
invested capital.
The
environment for the Company’s products is competitive in each of the Company’s
key geographic markets, due, in part, to industry and retail consolidation.
Specifically, in the U.K. and Australia, the market for branded wine continues
to be challenging; furthermore, retailer consolidation is contributing to
increased competition and promotional activities among suppliers. Competition
in
the U.S. beers and spirits markets is normally intense, with domestic and
imported beer producers increasing brand spending in an effort to gain market
share.
Additionally,
the supply of certain raw materials, particularly grapes, as well as consumer
demand, can affect the overall competitive environment. Two years of lighter
than expected California grape harvests in calendar 2004 and 2003, combined
with
a reduction in wine grape acreage in California, brought the U.S. grape supply
more into balance with demand during calendar 2005. This led to an overall
firming of the pricing of wine grape varietals from California. The calendar
2005 California grape harvest was substantially larger than the prior year;
however, following two years of lighter harvests, the Company does not currently
expect the balance between supply and demand to change significantly. Two
years
of record Australian grape harvests have contributed to an oversupply of
Australian grapes, particularly for certain red varietals. This has led to
an
overall reduction in grape costs for these varietals, which may affect markets
for Australian wines around the world.
For
the
year ended February 28, 2006 (“Fiscal 2006”), the Company’s results of
operations benefited from the inclusion of an additional ten months of
operations of Robert Mondavi (as defined below). The Company’s net sales
increased 13% over the year ended February 28, 2005 (“Fiscal 2005”), primarily
from increases in branded wine net sales and imported beer net sales. Operating
income increased 17% over the comparable prior year period primarily due
to the
favorable sales mix shift to higher margin wine brands acquired in the Robert
Mondavi acquisition partially offset by increased acquisition-related
integration costs, restructuring and related charges and unusual costs (see
below under “Fiscal 2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005 - Operating Income”
discussion). Net income increased 18% over the comparable prior year period
as a
result of the above factors combined with a lower effective income tax rate
partially offset by increased interest expense.
The
following discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting
(i) consolidated results of operations of the Company for Fiscal 2006 compared
to Fiscal 2005, and Fiscal 2005 compared to the year ended February 29, 2004
(“Fiscal 2004”), and (ii) financial liquidity and capital resources for Fiscal
2006. This discussion and analysis also identifies certain acquisition-related
integration costs, restructuring and related charges and net unusual costs
expected to affect consolidated results of operations of the Company for
the
year ending February 28, 2007 (“Fiscal 2007”). This discussion and analysis
should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included herein.
26
Recent
Developments
Pending
Acquisition of Vincor
On
April
2, 2006, the Company entered into an arrangement agreement (the “Arrangement
Agreement”) with Vincor International Inc. (“Vincor”) pursuant to which, subject
to satisfaction of certain conditions, the Company will acquire all of
the issued and outstanding common shares of Vincor. Vincor is the world’s eighth
largest producer and distributor of wine and related products by revenue
based
in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, and is Canada’s largest producer and marketer
of wine. Vincor is also one of the largest wine importers, marketers and
distributors in the U.K. In connection with the production of its products,
Vincor owns, operates and has interests in certain wineries and controls
certain
vineyards. Vincor produces, markets and sells premium, super-premium and
fine
wines from Canada, California, Washington State, Western Australia and New
Zealand. Some of Vincor’s well-known premium brands include Inniskillin,
Jackson-Triggs, Sumac Ridge, Hawthorne Mountain, R.H. Phillips, Toasted Head,
Hogue, Kim Crawford and Kumala.
The
pending acquisition of Vincor supports the Company’s strategy of strengthening
the breadth of its portfolio across price segments and geographic markets
to
capitalize on the overall growth in the wine industry. In addition to
complementing the Company’s current operations in the U.S., U.K., Australia and
New Zealand, the acquisition of Vincor would increase the Company’s global
presence by adding Canada as another core geographic market. In addition,
the
acquisition of Vincor would make the Company the largest wine company in
Canada
and would strengthen the Company’s position as the largest wine company in the
world and the largest premium wine company in the U.S.
The
Arrangement Agreement provides for Vincor shareholders to receive in cash
Cdn$36.50 per common share. Total consideration to be paid in cash to the
Vincor
shareholders is expected to be approximately Cdn$1.2 billion. In addition,
the
Company expects to pay certain obligations of Vincor, including indebtedness
outstanding under its bank facility and secured notes. In April 2006, the
Company entered into a foreign currency forward contract in connection with
the pending acquisition of Vincor to fix the U.S. dollar cost of the
acquisition and the payment of certain outstanding indebtedness. The foreign
currency forward contract is for the purchase of Cdn$1.4 billion at a rate
of
Cdn$1.149 to U.S.$1.00. The Company will be required to mark the foreign
currency forward contract to market with resulting gains or losses to be
recorded in future results of operations. The consideration to be paid to
the
shareholders and the amount needed to repay outstanding indebtedness of
Vincor is expected to be financed with borrowings under an amended and restated
senior credit facility. The Company currently expects to complete the
acquisition of Vincor in early June 2006.
If
the
pending acquisition is completed, the results of operations of the Vincor
business would be reported in the Constellation Wines segment and would be
included in the consolidated results of operations of the Company from the
date
of acquisition. The acquisition of Vincor would be considered significant
and
the Company would expect it to have a material impact on the Company’s future
results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
27
Acquisitions
in Fiscal 2005 and Fiscal 2004 and Equity Method
Investment
Acquisition
of Robert Mondavi
On
December 22, 2004, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock
of
The Robert Mondavi Corporation (“Robert Mondavi”), a leading premium wine
producer based in Napa, California. Through this transaction, the Company
acquired various additional winery and vineyard interests, and, additionally
produces, markets and sells premium, super-premium and fine California wines
under
the
Woodbridge by Robert Mondavi, Robert Mondavi Private Selection and Robert
Mondavi Winery brand names. In the United States, Woodbridge is the leading
domestic premium wine brand and Robert Mondavi Private Selection is the leading
super-premium wine brand. As
a
result of the Robert Mondavi acquisition, the Company acquired an ownership
interest in Opus One, a joint venture owned equally by Robert Mondavi and
Baron
Philippe de Rothschild, S.A. During September 2005, the Company’s president and
Baroness Philippine de Rothschild announced an agreement to maintain equal
ownership of Opus One. Opus One produces fine wines at its Napa Valley
winery.
The
acquisition of Robert Mondavi supports the Company’s strategy of strengthening
the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall
growth in the premium, super-premium and fine wine categories. The Company
believes that the acquired Robert Mondavi brand names have strong brand
recognition globally. The vast majority of sales from these brands are generated
in the United States. The Company is leveraging the Robert Mondavi brands
in the
United States through its selling, marketing and distribution infrastructure.
The Company also intends to further expand distribution for the Robert Mondavi
brands in Europe through its Constellation Europe infrastructure. Distribution
of the Robert Mondavi Woodbridge brand in the U.K. market is underway and
the
brand has been introduced into most major U.K. retailers.
The
Robert Mondavi acquisition supports the Company’s strategy of growth and breadth
across categories and geographies, and strengthens its competitive position
in
certain of its core markets. The
Robert Mondavi acquisition provides the Company with a greater presence in
the
growing premium, super-premium and fine wine sectors within the United States
and the ability to capitalize on the broader geographic distribution in
strategic international markets. In
particular, the Company believes there are growth opportunities for premium,
super-premium and fine wines in the United Kingdom and other “new world” wine
markets.
Total
consideration paid in cash to the Robert Mondavi shareholders was $1,030.7
million. Additionally, the Company incurred direct acquisition costs of $12.0
million. The purchase price was financed with borrowings under the Company’s
2004 Credit Agreement (as defined below). In accordance with the purchase
method
of accounting, the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the
date of
acquisition. The purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future
operating results of the Robert Mondavi business, including the factors
described above, as well as an estimated benefit from operating cost
synergies.
The
results of operations of the Robert Mondavi business have been reported in
the
Company’s Constellation Wines segment since December 22, 2004. Accordingly, the
Company’s results of operations for Fiscal 2006 include the results of
operations of the Robert Mondavi business for the entire period, whereas
the
results of operations for Fiscal 2005 only include the results of operations
of
the Robert Mondavi business from December 22, 2004, to the end of Fiscal
2005.
Following
the Robert Mondavi acquisition, the Company sold certain of the acquired
vineyard properties and related assets, investments accounted for under the
equity method, and winery properties and related assets. The
Company realized net proceeds of $170.8 million from the sale of certain of
these assets during Fiscal 2006. Sales of these assets are complete, and,
since
the date of acquisition through February 28, 2006, net proceeds from these
asset
sales total $180.7 million. No gain or loss has been recognized upon the
sale of
these assets.
28
Acquisition
of Hardy
On
March
27, 2003, the Company acquired control of BRL Hardy Limited, now known as
Hardy
Wine Company Limited (“Hardy”), and on April 9, 2003, the Company completed its
acquisition of all of Hardy’s outstanding capital stock. As a result of the
acquisition of Hardy, the Company also acquired the remaining 50% ownership
of
Pacific Wine Partners LLC (“PWP”), the joint venture the Company established
with Hardy in July 2001. The acquisition of Hardy along with the remaining
interest in PWP is referred to together as the “Hardy Acquisition.” Through this
acquisition, the Company acquired one of Australia’s largest wine producers with
interests in wineries and vineyards in most of Australia’s major wine regions as
well as New Zealand and the United States. Hardy has a comprehensive portfolio
of wine products across all price points with a strong focus on premium wine
production. Hardy’s wines are distributed worldwide through a network of
marketing and sales operations, with the majority of sales generated in
Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. In October 2005, PWP
was
merged into another subsidiary of the Company.
Total
consideration paid in cash and Class A Common Stock to the Hardy shareholders
was $1,137.4 million. Additionally, the Company recorded direct acquisition
costs of $17.2 million. The acquisition date for accounting purposes is March
27, 2003. The Company has recorded a $1.6 million reduction in the purchase
price to reflect imputed interest between the accounting acquisition date
and
the final payment of consideration. This charge is included as interest expense
in the Consolidated Statement of Income for Fiscal 2004. The cash portion
of the
purchase price paid to the Hardy shareholders and optionholders ($1,060.2
million) was financed with $660.2 million of borrowings under the Company’s then
existing credit agreement and $400.0 million of borrowings under the Company’s
then existing bridge loan agreement. Additionally, the Company issued 6,577,826
shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, which were valued at $77.2 million
based on the simple average of the closing market price of the Company’s Class A
Common Stock beginning two days before and ending two days after April 4,
2003,
the day the Hardy shareholders elected the form of consideration they wished
to
receive. The purchase price was based primarily on a discounted cash flow
analysis that contemplated, among other things, the value of a broader
geographic distribution in strategic international markets and a presence
in the
important Australian winemaking regions. The Company and Hardy have
complementary businesses that share a common growth orientation and operating
philosophy. The Hardy Acquisition supports the Company’s strategy of growth and
breadth across categories and geographies, and strengthens its competitive
position in its core markets. The purchase price and resulting goodwill were
primarily based on the growth opportunities of the brand portfolio of Hardy.
In
particular, the Company believes there are growth opportunities for Australian
wines in the United Kingdom, United States and other wine markets. This
acquisition supports the Company’s strategy of driving long-term growth and
positions the Company to capitalize on the growth opportunities in “new world”
wine markets.
The
results of operations of Hardy and PWP have been reported in the Company’s
Constellation Wines segment since March 27, 2003. Accordingly, the Company’s
results of operations for Fiscal 2005 include the results of operations of
Hardy
and PWP for the entire period, whereas the results of operations for Fiscal
2004
only include the results of operations of Hardy and PWP from March 27, 2003,
to
the end of Fiscal 2004.
29
Investment
in Ruffino
On
December 3, 2004, the Company purchased a 40% interest in Ruffino S.r.l.
(“Ruffino”), the well-known Italian fine wine company, for $89.6 million,
including direct acquisition costs of $7.5 million. As of February 1, 2005,
the
Constellation Wines segment began distributing Ruffino’s products in the United
States. The Company accounts for the investment under the equity method;
accordingly, the results of operations of Ruffino from December 3, 2004,
are
included in the equity in earnings of equity method investees line in the
Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
Results
of Operations
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Net
Sales
The
following table sets forth the net sales (in millions of dollars) by operating
segment of the Company for Fiscal 2006 and Fiscal 2005.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
|
||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
%
Increase(Decrease)
|
||||||||
Constellation
Wines:
|
||||||||||
Branded
wine
|
$
|
2,263.4
|
$
|
1,830.8
|
24%
|
|
||||
Wholesale
and other
|
972.0
|
1,020.6
|
(5)%
|
|
||||||
Constellation
Wines net sales
|
$
|
3,235.4
|
$
|
2,851.4
|
13%
|
|
||||
Constellation
Beers and Spirits:
|
||||||||||
Imported
beers
|
$
|
1,043.5
|
$
|
922.9
|
13%
|
|
||||
Spirits
|
324.5
|
313.3
|
4
%
|
|
||||||
Constellation
Beers and Spirits net sales
|
$
|
1,368.0
|
$
|
1,236.2
|
11
%
|
|
||||
Corporate
Operations and Other
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
N/A
|
|||||
Consolidated
Net Sales
|
$
|
4,603.4
|
$
|
4,087.6
|
13
%
|
|
Net
sales
for Fiscal 2006 increased to $4,603.4 million from $4,087.6 million for Fiscal
2005, an increase of $515.8 million, or 13%. This increase resulted primarily
from an increase in branded wine net sales of $440.1 million (on a constant
currency basis) and imported beer net sales of $120.5 million, partially
offset
by an unfavorable foreign currency impact of $35.5 million.
Constellation
Wines
Net
sales
for Constellation Wines increased to $3,235.4 million for Fiscal 2006 from
$2,851.4 million in Fiscal 2005, an increase of $384.0 million, or 13%. Branded
wine net sales increased $432.6 million primarily from $337.5 million of
net
sales of the acquired Robert Mondavi brands and $43.6 million of net sales
of
Ruffino brands, which the Company began distributing in the U.S. on February
1,
2005, as well as a $51.5 million increase in branded wine net sales (excluding
sales of Robert Mondavi and Ruffino brands). The $51.5 million increase is
due
primarily to volume growth in the Company’s branded wine net sales in the U.S.
as well as new product introductions. Wholesale and other net sales decreased
$48.5 million ($20.5 million on a constant currency basis) as growth in the
U.K.
wholesale business was more than offset by a decrease in other net sales.
The
decrease in other net sales is primarily due to the Company’s Fiscal 2004
decision to exit the commodity concentrate business during Fiscal
2005.
30
Constellation
Beers and Spirits
Net
sales
for Constellation Beers and Spirits increased to $1,368.0 million for Fiscal
2006 from $1,236.2 million for Fiscal 2005, an increase of $131.8 million,
or
11%. This increase resulted from increases in imported beers net sales of
$120.5
million and spirits net sales of $11.3 million. The growth in imported beers
net
sales is primarily due to volume growth in the Company’s Mexican beer portfolio.
The growth in spirits net sales is attributable primarily to an increase
in the
Company’s contract production net sales.
Gross
Profit
The
Company’s gross profit increased to $1,324.6 million for Fiscal 2006 from
$1,140.6 million for Fiscal 2005, an increase of $184.0 million, or 16%.
The
Constellation Wines segment’s gross profit increased $191.0 million primarily
due to the additional gross profit of $171.7 million from the Robert Mondavi
acquisition and additional gross profit from the volume growth in branded
wine
net sales in the U.S., partially offset by the reduced gross profit from
the
decrease in other net sales. The Constellation Beers and Spirits segment’s gross
profit increased $21.0 million primarily due to volume growth in the Company’s
Mexican beer portfolio partially offset by higher Mexican beer product costs
and
transportation costs. However, in connection with certain supply arrangements,
the higher Mexican beer product costs were offset by a corresponding decrease
in
advertising expenses resulting in no impact to operating income. In addition,
unusual items, which consist of certain costs that are excluded by management
in
their evaluation of the results of each operating segment, were higher by
$28.1
million in Fiscal 2006 versus Fiscal 2005. This increase resulted primarily
from
accelerated depreciation costs associated with the Fiscal 2006 Plan (as defined
below) of $13.4 million and increased flow through of adverse grape cost
associated with the Robert Mondavi acquisition of $13.2 million. Gross profit
as
a percent of net sales increased to 28.8% for Fiscal 2006 from 27.9% for
Fiscal
2005 primarily due to sales of higher-margin wine brands acquired in the
Robert
Mondavi acquisition, partially offset by the higher unusual items and higher
Mexican beer product costs and transportation costs.
The
Company expects transportation costs to continue to impact the Company’s gross
margins. However, the Company is addressing this matter by continuing its
evaluation and implementation of price increases on a market by market
basis.
31
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased to $612.4 million for Fiscal
2006
from $555.7 million for Fiscal 2005, an increase of $56.7 million, or 10%.
The
Constellation Wines segment’s selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $67.2 million primarily due to increased selling expenses, general
and
administrative, and advertising expenses to support the growth in the segment’s
business, primarily due to the costs related to the brands acquired in the
Robert Mondavi acquisition. In addition, general and administrative expenses
were negatively impacted as a result of an adjustment associated with the
segment’s U.K. defined benefit pension plan related to a reduction in the period
over which unrecognized actuarial losses are amortized. The Constellation
Beers
and Spirits segment’s selling, general and administrative expenses increased
$4.6 million as increased selling and general and administrative expenses
were
partially offset by lower advertising expenses. The Corporate Operations
and
Other segment’s selling, general and administrative expenses increased $7.0
million primarily due to costs associated with professional service fees
incurred in connection with the Company’s tender offer for Vincor that expired
in December 2005 and increased general and administrative expenses to support
the Company’s growth. Lastly, there was a decrease of $22.1 million of unusual
costs which consist of certain items that are excluded by management in their
evaluation of the results of each operating segment. Fiscal 2006 included
costs
associated primarily with professional service fees incurred for due diligence
in connection with the Company’s evaluation of a potential offer for Allied
Domecq of $3.4 million. Fiscal 2005 costs included $31.7 million of financing
costs recorded in Fiscal 2005 related to (i) the Company’s redemption of its
$200.0 million aggregate principal amount of 8 1/2% Senior Subordinated Notes
due March 2009 (the “Senior Subordinated Notes”) and (ii) the Company’s new
senior credit facility entered into in connection with the Robert Mondavi
acquisition, partially offset by net gains of $6.1 million recorded in Fiscal
2005 on the sales of non-strategic assets and the receipt of a payment
associated with the termination of a previously announced potential fine
wine
joint venture. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent
of net
sales decreased to 13.3% for Fiscal 2006 as compared to 13.6% for Fiscal
2005
primarily due to the decrease in unusual costs.
Acquisition-Related
Integration Costs
The
Company recorded $16.8 million of acquisition-related integration costs for
Fiscal 2006 in connection with the Company’s decision to restructure and
integrate the operations of Robert Mondavi (the “Robert Mondavi Plan”).
Acquisition-related integration costs included $5.3 million of employee-related
costs and $11.5 million of facilities and other one-time costs. The Company
recorded $9.4 million of acquisition-related integration costs for Fiscal
2005
in connection with the Robert Mondavi Plan. The Company does not expect
acquisition-related integration costs in connection with the Robert Mondavi
Plan
to be significant for Fiscal 2007.
32
Restructuring
and Related Charges
The
Company recorded $29.3 million of restructuring and related charges for Fiscal
2006 associated with the restructuring plans of the Constellation Wines segment.
Restructuring and related charges resulted from (i) the further realignment
of
business operations as previously announced in Fiscal 2004, a component of
the
Fiscal 2004 Plan (as defined below under the caption “Fiscal 2005 Compared to
Fiscal 2004 - Restructuring and Related Charges”), (ii) the Robert Mondavi Plan,
and (iii) costs associated with the worldwide wine reorganization announced
in
February 2006 (including certain personnel reductions in the U.K. during
the
third quarter of fiscal 2006) and the Company’s program to consolidate certain
west coast production processes in the U.S. (collectively, the “Fiscal 2006
Plan”). Restructuring and related charges recorded in connection with the Fiscal
2004 Plan included $0.7 million of employee termination benefit costs and
$1.3
million of facility consolidation and relocation costs. Restructuring and
related charges recorded in connection with the Robert Mondavi Plan included
$1.6 million of employee termination benefit costs, $0.7 million of contract
termination costs and $0.5 million of facility consolidation and relocation
costs. Restructuring and related charges recorded in connection with the
Fiscal
2006 Plan included $24.3 million of employee termination benefit costs and
$0.2
million of facility consolidation and relocation costs. In addition, in
connection with the Fiscal 2006 Plan, the Company recorded (i) $13.4 million
of
accelerated depreciation charges in connection with the Company’s investment in
new assets and reconfiguration of certain existing assets under the plan
and
(ii) $0.1 million of other related costs which were recorded in the cost
of
product sold line and the selling, general and administrative expenses line,
respectively, within the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company recorded
$7.6 million of restructuring and related charges for Fiscal 2005 associated
with the Fiscal 2004 Plan and the Robert Mondavi Plan.
For
Fiscal 2007, the Company expects to incur total restructuring and related
charges of $24.8 million associated primarily with the Fiscal 2006 Plan and
the
Robert Mondavi Plan. In addition, the Company expects to incur total accelerated
depreciation charges of $7.0 million associated with the Fiscal 2006 Plan.
Lastly, the Company expects to incur total other related costs of $8.3 million
associated with the Fiscal 2006 Plan.
Operating
Income
The
following table sets forth the operating income (loss) (in millions of dollars)
by operating segment of the Company for Fiscal 2006 and Fiscal
2005.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
|
||||||||||
Operating
Income (Loss)
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
%
Increase
|
||||||||
Constellation
Wines
|
$
|
530.4
|
$
|
406.6
|
30%
|
|
||||
Constellation
Beers and Spirits
|
292.6
|
276.1
|
6%
|
|
||||||
Corporate
Operations and Other
|
(63.0
|
)
|
(56.0
|
)
|
13%
|
|
||||
Total
Reportable Segments
|
760.0
|
626.7
|
21%
|
|
||||||
Acquisition-Related
Integration Costs,
Restructuring
and Related Charges
and
Net Unusual Costs
|
(93.9
|
)
|
(58.8
|
)
|
60%
|
|
||||
Consolidated
Operating Income
|
$
|
666.1
|
$
|
567.9
|
17%
|
|
33
As
a
result of the factors discussed above, consolidated operating income increased
to $666.1 million for Fiscal 2006 from $567.9 million for Fiscal 2005, an
increase of $98.2 million, or 17%. Acquisition-related integration costs,
restructuring and related charges and unusual costs of $93.9 million for
Fiscal
2006 consist of certain costs that are excluded by management in their
evaluation of the results of each operating segment. These costs represent
restructuring and related charges of $29.3 million associated primarily with
the
Fiscal 2006 Plan and the Robert Mondavi Plan; the flow through of adverse
grape
cost and acquisition-related integration costs associated with the Robert
Mondavi acquisition of $23.0 million and $16.8 million, respectively;
accelerated depreciation costs of $13.4 million associated with the Fiscal
2006
Plan; the flow through of inventory step-up associated with the Robert Mondavi
acquisition of $7.9 million; costs associated with professional service fees
incurred for due diligence in connection with the Company’s evaluation of a
potential offer for Allied Domecq of $3.4 million; and other costs associated
with the Fiscal 2006 Plan of $0.1 million. Acquisition-related integration
costs, restructuring and related charges and unusual costs of $58.8 million
for
Fiscal 2005 represent financing costs associated with the redemption of the
Company’s Senior Subordinated Notes and the Company’s new senior credit facility
entered into in connection with the Robert Mondavi acquisition of $31.7 million;
adverse grape cost and acquisition-related integration costs associated with
the
Company’s acquisition of Robert Mondavi of $9.8 million and $9.4 million,
respectively; restructuring and related charges of $7.6 million in the wine
segment associated with the Company’s realignment of its business operations and
the Robert Mondavi acquisition; and the flow through of inventory step-up
associated with the Hardy and Robert Mondavi acquisitions of $6.4 million;
partially offset by a net gain on the sale of non-strategic assets of $3.1
million and a gain related to the receipt of a payment associated with the
termination of a previously announced potential fine wine joint venture of
$3.0
million.
Equity
in Earnings of Equity Method Investees
The
Company’s equity in earnings of equity method investees decreased to $0.8
million in Fiscal 2006 from $1.8 million in Fiscal 2005, a decrease of $0.9
million due primarily to a $5.0 million loss from the Company’s investment in
Ruffino, partially offset by an increase in earnings of $4.1 million associated
primarily with the Company’s investment in Opus One as a result of the Robert
Mondavi acquisition. The $5.0 million loss from the Company’s investment in
Ruffino is due primarily to the write-down of certain pre-acquisition Ruffino
inventories.
Interest
Expense, Net
Interest
expense, net of interest income of $4.2 million and $2.3 million for Fiscal
2006
and Fiscal 2005, respectively, increased to $189.7 million for Fiscal 2006
from
$137.7 million for Fiscal 2005, an increase of $52.0 million, or 38%. The
increase resulted primarily from higher average borrowings in Fiscal 2006
primarily due to the Robert Mondavi acquisition and the investment in Ruffino
in
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The
Company’s effective tax rate was 31.8% for Fiscal 2006 and 36.0% for Fiscal
2005, a decrease of 4.2%. This decrease was primarily due to a non-cash
reduction in the Company’s provision for income taxes of $16.2 million, or 3.4%,
as a result of adjustments to income tax accruals in connection with the
completion of various income tax examinations plus the income tax benefit
the
Company recorded under the repatriation provisions of the “American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004” in connection with distributions of certain foreign
earnings. The Company expects the effective tax rate for Fiscal 2007 to be
approximately 36.5%, which is slightly higher than historical
levels, as an increasing percentage of the Company’s earnings are coming
from higher tax jurisdictions.
34
Net
Income
As
a
result of the above factors, net income increased to $325.3
million
for Fiscal 2006 from $276.5 million for Fiscal 2005, an increase of
$48.8
million,
or 18%.
Fiscal
2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
Net
Sales
The
following table sets forth the net sales (in millions of dollars) by operating
segment of the Company for Fiscal 2005 and Fiscal 2004.
Fiscal
2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
|
||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
%
Increase(Decrease)
|
||||||||
Constellation
Wines:
|
||||||||||
Branded
wine
|
$
|
1,830.8
|
$
|
1,549.7
|
18%
|
|
||||
Wholesale
and other
|
1,020.6
|
846.3
|
21
%
|
|
||||||
Constellation
Wines net sales
|
$
|
2,851.4
|
$
|
2,396.0
|
19
%
|
|
||||
Constellation
Beers and Spirits:
|
||||||||||
Imported
beers
|
$
|
922.9
|
$
|
862.6
|
7%
|
|
||||
Spirits
|
313.3
|
284.6
|
10
%
|
|
||||||
Constellation
Beers and Spirits net sales
|
$
|
1,236.2
|
$
|
1,147.2
|
8
%
|
|
||||
Corporate
Operations and Other
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
N/A
|
|||||
Unusual
gain
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
9.2
|
(100.0)%
|
|
||||
Consolidated
Net Sales
|
$
|
4,087.6
|
$
|
3,552.4
|
15
%
|
|
Net
sales
for Fiscal 2005 increased to $4,087.6 million from $3,552.4 million for Fiscal
2004, an increase of $535.2 million, or 15%. This increase resulted primarily
from an increase in branded wine net sales of $217.8 million (on a constant
currency basis), including $84.2 million of net sales of the acquired Robert
Mondavi brands and $45.7 million of net sales of the acquired Hardy brands;
an
increase in U.K. wholesale net sales of $84.1 million (on a constant currency
basis); and an increase in imported beer net sales of $60.3 million. In
addition, net sales benefited from a favorable foreign currency impact of
$155.5
million.
Constellation
Wines
Net
sales
for Constellation Wines increased to $2,851.4 million for Fiscal 2005 from
$2,396.0 million in Fiscal 2004, an increase of $455.4 million, or 19%. Branded
wine net sales increased $281.1 million. This increase resulted from increased
branded wine net sales in the U.S., Europe and Australasia of $217.8 million
(on
a constant currency basis), including $84.2 million of net sales of the acquired
Robert Mondavi brands and an additional one month of net sales of $45.7 million
of the acquired Hardy brands, completed in March 2003, and a favorable foreign
currency impact of $63.3 million. The increases in branded wine net sales
in the
U.S., Europe and Australasia are primarily due to volume growth as the Company
continues to benefit from increased distribution and greater consumer demand
for
premium wines. Wholesale and other net sales increased $174.3 million primarily
due to growth in the U.K. wholesale business of $84.1 million (on a constant
currency basis) and a favorable foreign currency impact of $92.2 million.
The
net sales increase in the U.K. wholesale business on a constant currency
basis
is primarily due to the addition of new national accounts in the first quarter
of fiscal 2005 and increased sales in existing accounts during Fiscal
2005.
35
Constellation
Beers and Spirits
Net
sales
for Constellation Beers and Spirits increased to $1,236.2 million for Fiscal
2005 from $1,147.2 million for Fiscal 2004, an increase of $89.0 million,
or 8%.
This increase resulted from a $60.3 million increase in imported beer net
sales
and an increase in spirits net sales of $28.7 million. The growth in imported
beer sales is primarily due to a price increase on the Company’s Mexican beer
portfolio, which was introduced in January 2004. The growth in spirits net
sales
is attributable to increases in both the Company’s contract production net sales
as well as volume growth in branded net sales.
Gross
Profit
The
Company’s gross profit increased to $1,140.6 million for Fiscal 2005 from $975.8
million for Fiscal 2004, an increase of $164.8 million, or 17%. The
Constellation Wines segment’s gross profit increased $122.6 million primarily
due to the additional two months of sales of products acquired in the Robert
Mondavi acquisition, volume growth in the U.S. branded wine net sales and
a
favorable foreign currency impact. The Constellation Beers and Spirits segment’s
gross profit increased $30.6 million primarily due to the increase in imported
beer net sales and volume growth in the segment’s spirits portfolio. In
addition, unusual items, which consist of certain costs that are excluded
by
management in their evaluation of the results of each operating segment,
were
lower by $11.6 million in Fiscal 2005 versus Fiscal 2004. This decrease resulted
from a $16.8 million write-down of commodity concentrate inventory in Fiscal
2004 in connection with the Company’s decision to exit the commodity concentrate
product line in the U.S. (see additional discussion under “Restructuring and
Related Charges” below) and reduced flow through of inventory step-up associated
with the Hardy and Robert Mondavi acquisitions of $16.0 million, partially
offset by the relief from certain excise tax, duty and other costs incurred
in
prior years of $11.5 million, which was recognized in the fourth quarter
of
fiscal 2004, and the flow through of adverse grape cost associated with the
Robert Mondavi acquisition of $9.8 million in Fiscal 2005. Gross profit as
a
percent of net sales increased to 27.9% for Fiscal 2005 from 27.5% for Fiscal
2004 primarily due to the lower unusual items.
36
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased to $555.7 million for Fiscal
2005
from $457.3 million for Fiscal 2004, an increase of $98.4 million, or 22%.
The
Constellation Wines segment’s selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $64.7 million primarily due to increased selling and advertising
expenses as the Company continues to invest behind specific wine brands to
drive
broader distribution and additional selling, general and administrative expenses
from the addition of the Robert Mondavi business. The Constellation Beers
and
Spirits segment’s selling, general and administrative expenses increased $7.1
million primarily due to increased imported beer and spirits selling expenses
to
support the growth across this segment’s businesses. The Corporate Operations
and Other segment’s selling, general and administrative expenses increased $13.7
million primarily due to increased general and administrative expenses to
support the Company’s growth and costs associated with higher professional
services fees, including costs incurred in connection with compliance activities
associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Lastly, there was an increase
of
$12.9 million of unusual costs which consist of certain items that are excluded
by management in their evaluation of the results of each operating segment.
This
increase includes $31.7 million of financing costs recorded in Fiscal 2005
related to (i) the Company’s redemption of its Senior Subordinated Notes and
(ii) the Company’s new senior credit facility entered into in connection with
the Robert Mondavi acquisition as compared to $11.6 million of financing
costs
recorded in Fiscal 2004 in connection with the Hardy Acquisition. Partially
offsetting the $20.1 million increase in financing costs were net gains recorded
in Fiscal 2005 on the sales of non-strategic assets and the receipt of a
payment
associated with the termination of a previously announced potential fine
wine
joint venture. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent
of net
sales increased to 13.6% for Fiscal 2005 as compared to 12.9% for Fiscal
2004
primarily due to the growth in the Corporate Operations and Other segment’s
general and administrative expenses and the increased unusual costs described
above.
Acquisition-Related
Integration Costs
The
Company recorded $9.4 million of acquisition-related integration costs for
Fiscal 2005 associated with the Robert Mondavi Plan. Acquisition-related
integration costs included $4.9 million of employee related costs and $4.5
million of facilities and other one-time costs.
Restructuring
and Related Charges
The
Company recorded $7.6 million of restructuring and related charges for Fiscal
2005 associated with the restructuring plans of the Constellation Wines segment.
Restructuring and related charges resulted from (i) the further realignment
of
business operations as previously announced in Fiscal 2004, (ii) the Company's
decision in Fiscal 2004 to exit the commodity concentrate product line in
the
U.S. (collectively, the “Fiscal 2004 Plan”), and (iii) the Robert Mondavi Plan.
Restructuring and related charges included $3.8 million of employee termination
benefit costs (net of reversal of prior accruals of $0.2 million), $1.5 million
of contract termination costs, $1.0 million of facility consolidation and
relocation costs, and other related charges of $1.3 million. The Company
recorded $31.1 million of restructuring and related charges for Fiscal 2004
associated with the Fiscal 2004 Plan. In total, the Company recorded $47.9
million of costs for Fiscal 2004 allocated between cost of product sold and
restructuring and related charges associated with the Fiscal 2004
Plan.
37
Operating
Income
The
following table sets forth the operating income (loss) (in millions of dollars)
by operating segment of the Company for Fiscal 2005 and Fiscal
2004.
Fiscal
2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
|
||||||||||
Operating
Income (Loss)
|
||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
%
Increase/
(Decrease)
|
||||||||
Constellation
Wines
|
$
|
406.6
|
$
|
348.1
|
17%
|
|
||||
Constellation
Beers and Spirits
|
276.1
|
252.5
|
9
%
|
|
||||||
Corporate
Operations and Other
|
(56.0
|
)
|
(41.7
|
)
|
34
%
|
|
||||
Total
Reportable Segments
|
626.7
|
558.9
|
12
%
|
|
||||||
Acquisition-Related
Integration Costs,
Restructuring
and Related Charges
and
Net Unusual Costs
|
(58.8
|
)
|
(71.5
|
)
|
(18)%
|
|
||||
Consolidated
Operating Income
|
$
|
567.9
|
$
|
487.4
|
17%
|
|
As
a
result of the factors discussed above, consolidated operating income increased
to $567.9 million for Fiscal 2005 from $487.4 million for Fiscal 2004, an
increase of $80.5 million, or 17%. Acquisition-related integration costs,
restructuring and related charges and net unusual costs of $58.8 million
for
Fiscal 2005 consist of certain costs that are excluded by management in their
evaluation of the results of each operating segment. These costs represent
financing costs associated with the redemption of the Company’s Senior
Subordinated Notes and the Company’s new senior credit facility entered into in
connection with the Robert Mondavi acquisition of $31.7 million, adverse
grape
cost and acquisition-related integration costs associated with the Company’s
acquisition of Robert Mondavi of $9.8 million and $9.4 million, respectively,
restructuring and related charges of $7.6 million in the wine segment associated
with the Company’s realignment of its business operations and the Robert Mondavi
acquisition, and the flow through of inventory step-up associated with the
Hardy
and Robert Mondavi acquisitions of $6.4 million, partially offset by a net
gain
on the sale of non-strategic assets of $3.1 million and a gain related to
the
receipt of a payment associated with the termination of a previously announced
potential fine wine joint venture of $3.0 million. Acquisition-related
integration costs, restructuring and related charges and net unusual costs
of
$71.6 million for Fiscal 2004 represent the flow through of inventory
step-up
and
the amortization of deferred financing costs associated with the Hardy
Acquisition of $22.5 million and $11.6 million, respectively, and costs
associated with exiting the commodity concentrate product line and the Company’s
realignment of its business operations in the wine segment, including the
write-down of commodity concentrate inventory of $16.8 million and restructuring
and related charges of $31.1 million, partially offset by the relief from
certain excise taxes, duty and other costs incurred in prior years of $10.4
million.
Interest
Expense, Net
Interest
expense, net of interest income of $2.3 million and $3.6 million for Fiscal
2005
and Fiscal 2004, respectively, decreased to $137.7 million for Fiscal 2005
from
$144.7 million for Fiscal 2004, a decrease of $7.0 million, or (5%). The
decrease resulted from lower average borrowing rates in Fiscal 2005 as well
as
lower average borrowings. The reduction in average borrowing rates was
attributed in part to the replacement of $200.0 million of higher fixed rate
subordinated note debt with lower variable rate revolver debt. The reduction
in
average borrowings resulted from the use of proceeds from the Company’s equity
offerings in July 2003 to pay down debt incurred to partially finance the
Hardy
Acquisition combined with on-going principal payments on long-term debt,
partially offset by additional borrowings in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2005
to finance the Robert Mondavi acquisition.
38
Provision
for Income Taxes
The
Company’s effective tax rate remained the same at 36.0% for Fiscal 2005 and
Fiscal 2004.
Net
Income
As
a
result of the above factors, net income increased to $276.5
million
for Fiscal 2005 from $220.4 million for Fiscal 2004, an increase of
$56.1
million,
or 25.4%.
Financial
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
The
Company’s principal use of cash in its operating activities is for purchasing
and carrying inventories and carrying seasonal accounts receivable. The
Company’s primary source of liquidity has historically been cash flow from
operations, except during annual grape harvests when the Company has relied
on
short-term borrowings. In the United States, the annual grape crush normally
begins in August and runs through October. In Australia, the annual grape
crush
normally begins in February and runs through May. The Company generally begins
taking delivery of grapes at the beginning of the crush season with payments
for
such grapes beginning to come due one month later. The Company’s short-term
borrowings to support such purchases generally reach their highest levels
one to
two months after the crush season has ended. Historically, the Company has
used
cash flow from operating activities to repay its short-term borrowings and
fund
capital expenditures. The Company will continue to use its short-term borrowings
to support its working capital requirements. The Company believes that cash
provided by operating activities and its financing activities, primarily
short-term borrowings, will provide adequate resources to satisfy its working
capital, scheduled principal and interest payments on debt, preferred stock
dividend payment requirements, and anticipated capital expenditure requirements
for both its short-term and long-term capital needs. In addition, the Company
intends to utilize cash provided by operating activities and financing
activities to repurchase shares under the Company’s share repurchase program
(see below) beginning in Fiscal 2007.
Fiscal
2006 Cash Flows
Operating
Activities
Net
cash
provided by operating activities for Fiscal 2006 was $436.0 million, which
resulted from $325.3 million of net income, plus $167.2 million of net non-cash
items charged to the Consolidated Statements of Income and $48.8 million
of cash
proceeds credited to accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) within the
Consolidated Balance Sheet, less $105.2 million representing the net change
in
the Company’s operating assets and liabilities.
The
net
non-cash items consisted primarily of depreciation of property, plant and
equipment and deferred tax provision. The cash proceeds credited to AOCI
consisted of $30.3 million in proceeds from the unwinding of certain interest
rate swaps (see discussion below under Senior Credit Facilities) and $18.5
million in proceeds from the early termination of certain foreign currency
derivative instruments related to the Company’s change in its structure of
certain of its cash flow hedges of forecasted foreign currency denominated
transactions. As the forecasted transactions are still probable, this amount
was
recorded to AOCI and will be reclassified from AOCI into earnings in the
same
periods in which the original hedged items are recorded in the Consolidated
Statements of Income. The net change in operating assets and liabilities
resulted primarily from an increase in inventories and decreases in accrued
advertising and promotion and restructuring accruals, partially offset by
a
decrease in accounts receivable.
39
Investing
Activities
Net
cash
used in investing activities for Fiscal 2006 was $15.6 million, which resulted
primarily from $132.5 million of capital expenditures and net cash paid of
$45.9
million for purchases of businesses, partially offset by $173.5 million of
net
proceeds from sales of assets, equity method investment, and businesses,
primarily attributable to sales of non-strategic Robert Mondavi
assets.
Financing
Activities
Net
cash
used in financing activities for Fiscal 2006 was $426.2 million resulting
primarily from principal payments of long-term debt of $527.6 million partially
offset by net proceeds of $63.8 million from notes payable and $31.5 million
of
proceeds from employee stock option exercises.
Fiscal
2005 Cash Flows
Operating
Activities
Net
cash
provided by operating activities for Fiscal 2005 was $320.7 million, which
resulted from $276.5 million of net income, plus $176.0 million of net non-cash
items charged to the Consolidated Statements of Income, less $131.7 million
representing the net change in the Company’s operating assets and liabilities.
The net non-cash items consisted primarily of depreciation of property, plant
and equipment, deferred tax provision and the non-cash portion of loss on
extinguishment of debt. The net change in operating assets and liabilities
resulted primarily from increases in accounts receivable and inventories.
The
increases in accounts receivable and inventories are primarily a result of
the Company’s growth in Fiscal 2005.
Investing
Activities
Net
cash
used in investing activities for Fiscal 2005 was $1,222.9 million, which
resulted primarily from net cash paid of $1,052.5 million for purchases of
businesses and $119.7 million of capital expenditures.
Financing
Activities
Net
cash
provided by financing activities for Fiscal 2005 was $884.2 million resulting
primarily from proceeds from issuance of long-term debt of $2,400.0 million,
partially offset by principal payments of long-term debt of $1,488.7
million.
Share
Repurchase Program
During
June 1998, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to
$100.0 million of its Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. Under
this
program, the Company had purchased a total of 8,150,688 shares of Class A
Common
Stock at an aggregate cost of $44.9 million, or at an average cost of $5.51
per
share. Of this total amount, no shares were repurchased during Fiscal 2006,
Fiscal 2005 or Fiscal 2004. During
February 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors replenished the June 1998
authorization to repurchase up to $100.0 million of the Company’s Class A Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock. The
repurchase of shares of common stock will be accomplished, from time to time,
in
management’s discretion and depending upon market conditions, through open
market or privately negotiated transactions. The Company may finance such
repurchases through cash generated from operations or through the senior
credit
facility. The repurchased shares will become treasury shares. As of May 1,
2006,
no additional shares were repurchased under the amended program.
40
Debt
Total
debt outstanding as of February 28, 2006, amounted to $2,809.7 million,
a decrease of $479.5
million
from February 28, 2005. The ratio of total debt to total capitalization
decreased to 48.6%
as of
February 28, 2006, from 54.2% as of February 28, 2005, primarily
due to the paydown of term debt resulting primarily from net cash provided
by
operating activities and proceeds from sales of non-strategic assets associated
with the Robert Mondavi acquisition, net of capital expenditures.
In
connection with the pending acquisition of Vincor, the Company expects to
finance the purchase price and repayment of Vincor’s outstanding indebtedness
with borrowings under an amended and restated senior credit facility. If
the
acquisition of Vincor is completed in early June 2006 as currently expected,
the
Company’s ratio of total debt to total capitalization will be significantly
impacted.
Senior
Credit Facility
2004
Credit Agreement
In
connection with the acquisition of Robert Mondavi, on December 22, 2004,
the
Company and its U.S. subsidiaries (excluding certain inactive subsidiaries),
together with certain of its subsidiaries organized in foreign jurisdictions,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as a lender and administrative agent, and certain
other agents, lenders, and financial institutions entered into a new credit
agreement (the “2004 Credit Agreement”). The 2004 Credit Agreement provides for
aggregate credit facilities of $2.9 billion (subject to increase as therein
provided to $3.2 billion), consisting of a $600.0 million tranche A term
loan
facility due in November 2010, a $1.8 billion tranche B term loan facility
due
in November 2011, and a $500.0 million revolving credit facility (including
a
sub-facility for letters of credit of up to $60.0 million) which terminates
in
December 2010. Proceeds of the 2004 Credit Agreement were used to pay off
the
Company’s obligations under its prior senior credit facility, to fund the cash
consideration payable in connection with its acquisition of Robert Mondavi,
and
to pay certain obligations of Robert Mondavi, including indebtedness outstanding
under its bank facility and unsecured notes of $355.4 million. The Company
uses
its revolving credit facility under the 2004 Credit Agreement for general
corporate purposes, including working capital, on an as needed
basis.
The
tranche A term loan facility and the tranche B term loan facility were fully
drawn on December 22, 2004. As of February 28, 2006, the required principal
repayments of the tranche A term loan and the tranche B term loan for each
of
the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter are as follows:
Tranche
A
Term
Loan
|
Tranche
B
Term
Loan
|
Total
|
||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||
2007
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
2008
|
45,182
|
-
|
45,182
|
|||||||
2009
|
103,273
|
14,563
|
117,836
|
|||||||
2010
|
109,727
|
14,563
|
124,290
|
|||||||
2011
|
96,818
|
353,160
|
449,978
|
|||||||
Thereafter
|
-
|
1,026,714
|
1,026,714
|
|||||||
$
|
355,000
|
$
|
1,409,000
|
$
|
1,764,000
|
The
rate
of interest on borrowings under the 2004 Credit Agreement, at the Company’s
option, is a function of LIBOR plus a margin, the federal funds rate plus
a
margin, or the prime rate plus a margin. The margin is adjustable based upon
the
Company’s debt ratio (as defined in the 2004 Credit Agreement) and, with respect
to LIBOR borrowings, ranges between 1.00% and 1.75%. As of February 28, 2006,
the LIBOR margin for the revolving credit facility and the tranche A term
loan
facility is 1.25%, while the LIBOR margin on the tranche B term loan facility
is
1.50%.
41
The
Company’s obligations are guaranteed by its U.S. subsidiaries (excluding certain
inactive subsidiaries) and by certain of its foreign subsidiaries. These
obligations are also secured by a pledge of (i) 100% of the ownership interests
in most of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries and (ii) 65% of the voting capital
stock of certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries.
The
Company and its subsidiaries are also subject to customary lending covenants
including those restricting additional liens, the incurrence of additional
indebtedness (including guarantees of indebtedness), the sale of assets,
the
payment of dividends, transactions with affiliates, the disposition and
acquisition of property and the making of certain investments, in each case
subject to numerous baskets, exceptions and thresholds. The financial covenants
are limited to maximum total debt and senior debt coverage ratios and minimum
fixed charges and interest coverage ratios. As of February 28, 2006, the
Company
is in compliance with all of its covenants under its 2004 Credit
Agreement.
As
of
February 28, 2006, under the 2004 Credit Agreement, the Company had outstanding
tranche A term loans of $355.0 million bearing a weighted average interest
rate
of 5.8%, tranche B term loans of $1,409.0 million bearing a weighted average
interest rate of 5.9%, revolving loans of $54.5 million bearing a weighted
average interest rate of 5.7%, undrawn revolving letters of credit of $35.1
million, and $410.4 million in revolving loans available to be
drawn.
In
March
2005, the Company replaced its then outstanding five year interest rate swap
agreements with new five year delayed start interest rate swap agreements
effective March 1, 2006, which are outstanding as of February 28, 2006. These
delayed start interest rate swap agreements extended the original hedged
period
through fiscal 2010. The swap agreements fixed LIBOR interest rates on $1,200.0
million of the Company’s floating LIBOR rate debt at an average rate of 4.1%
over the five year term. The Company received $30.3 million in proceeds from
the
unwinding of the original swaps. This amount will be reclassified from
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”) ratably into earnings in the
same period in which the original hedged item is recorded in the Consolidated
Statements of Income. For Fiscal 2006, the Company reclassified $3.6 million
from AOCI to Interest Expense, net in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of
Income. This non-cash operating activity is included in the Other, net line
in
the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Foreign
Subsidiary Facilities
The
Company has additional credit arrangements available totaling $188.9 million
as
of February 28, 2006. These arrangements support the financing needs of certain
of the Company’s foreign subsidiary operations. Interest rates and other terms
of these borrowings vary from country to country, depending on local market
conditions. As of February 28, 2006, amounts outstanding under the subsidiary
credit arrangements were $52.3 million.
Senior
Notes
As
of
February 28, 2006, the Company had outstanding $200.0 million aggregate
principal amount of 8 5/8% Senior Notes due August 2006 (the “Senior Notes”).
The Senior Notes are currently redeemable, in whole or in part, at the option
of
the Company.
As
of
February 28, 2006, the Company had outstanding £1.0 million ($1.8 million)
aggregate principal amount of 8 1/2% Series B Senior Notes due November 2009
(the “Sterling Series B Senior Notes”). In addition, as of February 28, 2006,
the Company had outstanding £154.0 million ($270.1 million, net of $0.3 million
unamortized discount) aggregate principal amount of 8 1/2% Series C Senior
Notes
due November 2009 (the “Sterling Series C Senior Notes”). The Sterling Series B
Senior Notes and Sterling Series C Senior Notes are currently redeemable,
in
whole or in part, at the option of the Company.
42
Also,
as
of February 28, 2006, the Company had outstanding $200.0 million aggregate
principal amount of 8% Senior Notes due February 2008 (the “February 2001 Senior
Notes”). The February 2001 Senior Notes are currently redeemable, in whole or in
part, at the option of the Company.
Senior
Subordinated Notes
As
of
February 28, 2006, the Company had outstanding $250.0 million aggregate
principal amount of 8 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due January 2012 (the
“January 2002 Senior Subordinated Notes”). The January 2002 Senior Subordinated
Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at
any
time on or after January 15, 2007.
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
The
following table sets forth information about the Company’s long-term contractual
obligations outstanding at February 28, 2006. It brings together data for
easy
reference from the consolidated balance sheet and from individual notes to
the
Company’s consolidated financial statements. See Notes 8, 9,
11,
12, 13 and 14
to the
Company’s consolidated financial statements located in Item 8 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for detailed discussion of items noted in the following
table.
PAYMENTS
DUE BY PERIOD
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
|
Less
than
1
year
|
1-3
years
|
3-5
years
|
After
5
years
|
||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Contractual
obligations
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes
payable to banks
|
$
|
79,881
|
$
|
79,881
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Long-term
debt (excluding
unamortized
discount)
|
2,730,188
|
214,066
|
378,234
|
856,085
|
1,281,803
|
|||||||||||
Operating
leases
|
457,377
|
65,586
|
97,018
|
71,491
|
223,282
|
|||||||||||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
312,699
|
86,154
|
69,414
|
46,896
|
110,235
|
|||||||||||
Unconditional
purchase
obligations(1)
|
2,105,767
|
414,060
|
627,630
|
389,789
|
674,288
|
|||||||||||
Total
contractual
obligations
|
$
|
5,685,912
|
$
|
859,747
|
$
|
1,172,296
|
$
|
1,364,261
|
$
|
2,289,608
|
(1) Total
unconditional purchase obligations consist of $26.1 million
for contracts to purchase various spirits over the next seven
fiscal
years, $1,920.9 million for contracts to purchase grapes over the next sixteen
fiscal years, $82.5 million for contracts to purchase bulk wine over the
next eight fiscal years and $76.3 million for processing contracts over the
next nine fiscal years. See Note 14 to the Company’s consolidated financial
statements located in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a detailed
discussion of these items.
Equity
Offerings
During
July 2003, the Company completed a public offering of 19,600,000 shares of
its
Class A Common Stock resulting in net proceeds to the Company, after deducting
underwriting discounts and expenses, of $261.2 million. In addition, the
Company
also completed a public offering of 170,500 shares of its 5.75% Series A
Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stock”) resulting in net
proceeds to the Company, after deducting underwriting discounts and expenses,
of
$164.9 million. The Class A Common Stock offering and the Preferred Stock
offering are referred to together as the “2003 Equity Offerings.” The majority
of the net proceeds from the 2003 Equity Offerings were used to repay the
Company’s then existing bridge loans that were incurred to partially finance the
Hardy Acquisition. The remaining proceeds were used to repay term loan
borrowings under the Company’s then existing senior credit
facility.
43
Capital
Expenditures
During
Fiscal 2006, the Company incurred $132.5 million for capital expenditures.
The
Company plans to spend approximately $155 million for capital expenditures
in
Fiscal 2007, excluding any amount the Company may incur after the completion
of
the pending acquisition of Vincor. In addition, the Company continues to
consider the purchase, lease and development of vineyards and may incur
additional expenditures for vineyards if opportunities become available.
See
“Business - Sources and Availability of Raw Materials” under Item 1 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Management reviews the capital expenditure program
periodically and modifies it as required to meet current business
needs.
Effects
of Inflation and Changing Prices
The
Company’s results of operations and financial condition have not been
significantly affected by inflation and changing prices. The Company has
been
able, subject to normal competitive conditions, to pass along rising costs
through increased selling prices and identifying on-going cost savings
initiatives. There can be no assurances, however, that the Company will continue
to be able to pass along rising costs through increased selling
prices.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
Company’s significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 to
the Company’s consolidated financial statements located in Item 8 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. However, certain of the Company’s accounting policies are
particularly important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial position and
results of operations and require the application of significant judgment
by the
Company’s management; as a result they are subject to an inherent degree of
uncertainty. In applying those policies, the Company’s management uses its
judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in the
determination of certain estimates. Those estimates are based on the Company’s
historical experience, the Company’s observance of trends in the industry,
information provided by the Company’s customers and information available from
other outside sources, as appropriate. On an ongoing basis, the Company reviews
its estimates to ensure that they appropriately reflect changes in the Company’s
business. The Company’s critical accounting policies include:
· |
Accounting
for promotional activities. Sales
reflect reductions attributable to consideration given to customers
in
various customer incentive programs, including pricing discounts
on single
transactions, volume discounts, promotional and advertising allowances,
coupons, and rebates. Certain customer incentive programs require
management to estimate the cost of those programs. The accrued
liability
for these programs is determined through analysis of programs offered,
historical trends, expectations regarding customer and consumer
participation, sales and payment trends, and experience with payment
patterns associated with similar programs that had been previously
offered. If assumptions included in the Company’s estimates were to change
or market conditions were to change, then material incremental
reductions
to revenue could be required, which would have a material adverse
impact
on the Company’s financial statements. Promotional costs were $501.9
million, $390.9 million and $336.4 million for Fiscal 2006, Fiscal
2005
and Fiscal 2004, respectively.
|
44
· |
Inventory
valuation.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being
determined on the first-in, first-out method. The Company assesses
the
valuation of its inventories and reduces the carrying value of
those
inventories that are obsolete or in excess of the Company’s forecasted
usage to their estimated net realizable value. The Company estimates
the
net realizable value of such inventories based on analyses and
assumptions
including, but not limited to, historical usage, future demand
and market
requirements. Reductions to the carrying value of inventories are
recorded
in cost of product sold. If the future demand for the Company’s
products is less favorable than the Company’s forecasts, then the value of
the inventories may be required to be reduced, which could result
in
material additional expense to the Company and have a material
adverse
impact on the Company’s financial
statements.
|
· |
Accounting
for business combinations.
The acquisition of businesses is an important element of the Company’s
strategy. Under the purchase method, the Company is required to
record the
net assets acquired at the estimated fair value at the date of
acquisition. The determination of the fair value of the assets
acquired
and liabilities assumed requires the Company to make estimates
and
assumptions that affect the Company’s financial statements. For example,
the Company’s acquisitions typically result in goodwill and other
intangible assets; the value and estimated life of those assets
may affect
the amount of future period amortization expense for intangible
assets
with finite lives as well as possible impairment charges that may
be
incurred.
|
· |
Impairment
of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives.
Intangible assets with indefinite lives consist primarily of trademarks
as
well as agency relationships. The Company is required to analyze
its
goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives for
impairment
on an annual basis as well as when events and circumstances indicate
that
an impairment may have occurred. Certain factors that may occur
and
indicate that an impairment exists include, but are not limited
to,
operating results that are lower than expected and adverse industry
or
market economic trends. The impairment testing requires management
to
estimate the fair value of the assets or reporting unit and record
an
impairment loss for the excess of the carrying value over the fair
value.
The estimate of fair value of the assets is generally determined
on the
basis of discounted future cash flows. The estimate of fair value
of the
reporting unit is generally determined on the basis of discounted
future
cash flows supplemented by the market approach. In estimating the
fair
value, management must make assumptions and projections regarding
such
items as future cash flows, future revenues, future earnings and
other
factors. The assumptions used in the estimate of fair value are
generally
consistent with the past performance of each reporting unit and
other
intangible assets and are also consistent with the projections
and
assumptions that are used in current operating plans. Such assumptions
are
subject to change as a result of changing economic and competitive
conditions. If these estimates or their related assumptions change
in the
future, the Company may be required to record an impairment loss
for these
assets. The recording of any resulting impairment loss could have
a
material adverse impact on the Company’s financial
statements.
|
45
Accounting
Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In
November 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
151 (“SFAS No. 151”), “Inventory Costs - an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.”
SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43 (“ARB
No. 43”), “Restatement and Revision of Accounting Research Bulletins,” Chapter
4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle
facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage).
SFAS
No. 151 requires that those items be recognized as current period charges.
In
addition, SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overheads
to
the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. As required, the Company adopted SFAS No. 151 on March 1, 2006.
The
adoption of SFAS No. 151 did not have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
123 (revised 2004) (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS No. 123(R)
replaces Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (“SFAS No. 123”),
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supersedes Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25 (“APB Opinion No. 25”), “Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees.” SFAS No. 123(R) requires the cost resulting from all share-based
payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. In addition,
SFAS No. 123(R) establishes fair value as the measurement objective in
accounting for share-based payment arrangements and requires all entities
to
apply a grant date fair-value-based measurement method in accounting for
share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123(R) also amends Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 95 (“SFAS No. 95”), “Statement of Cash
Flows,” to require that excess tax benefits be reported as a financing cash
inflow rather than as a reduction of taxes paid. SFAS No. 123(R) applies
to all
awards granted, modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the required effective
date (see below). In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)
staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB No. 107”), “Share-Based
Payment,” to express the views of the staff regarding the interaction between
SFAS No. 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations and to provide the
staff’s
views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public
companies. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) as of March 1, 2006, using
the
modified prospective application. This application requires compensation
cost to
be recognized on or after the required effective date for the portion of
outstanding awards for which the requisite service has not yet been rendered
based on the grant date fair value of those awards as calculated under SFAS
No.
123 for either recognition or pro forma disclosures. As of March 1, 2006,
the
unrecognized compensation expense associated with the remaining portion of
the
unvested outstanding awards is not material. In addition, the Company estimates
stock-based compensation expense for options to be granted for the year ended
February 28, 2007, to approximate $8.5 million, excluding any options granted
or which may be granted in connection with the pending acquisition of
Vincor.
46
In
May
2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154
(“SFAS
No. 154”), “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - a replacement of APB
Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.” SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements
for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle.
SFAS
No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle and requires
retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in
accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the
period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of changing to the new
accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 requires that a change in depreciation,
amortization, or depletion method for long-lived, nonfinancial assets be
accounted for as a change of estimate effected by a change in accounting
principle. SFAS No. 154 also carries forward without change the guidance
in APB
Opinion No. 20 with respect to accounting for changes in accounting estimates,
changes in the reporting unit and correction of an error in previously issued
financial statements. As required, the Company adopted SFAS No. 154 on March
1,
2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 154 did not have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
47
Item
7A. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The
Company, as a result of its global operating, acquisition and financing
activities, is exposed to market risk associated with changes in foreign
currency exchange rates and interest rates. To manage the volatility relating
to
these risks, the Company periodically purchases and/or sells derivative
instruments including foreign currency exchange contracts and interest rate
swap
agreements. The Company uses derivative instruments solely to reduce the
financial impact of these risks and does not use derivative instruments for
trading purposes.
Foreign
currency forward contracts are or may be used to hedge existing foreign currency
denominated assets and liabilities, forecasted foreign currency denominated
sales both to third parties as well as intercompany sales, intercompany
principal and interest payments, and in connection with acquisitions or joint
venture investments outside the U.S. As of February 28, 2006, the Company
had
exposures to foreign currency risk primarily related to the Australian dollar,
euro, New Zealand dollar, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar and Mexican
peso.
As
of
February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005, the Company had outstanding foreign
exchange derivative instruments with a notional value of $1,254.7 million
and
$601.6 million,
respectively. Approximately 65% of the Company’s total exposures were hedged as
of February 28, 2006. Using a sensitivity analysis based on estimated fair
value
of open contracts using forward rates, if the contract base currency had
been
10% weaker as of February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005, the fair value
of
open foreign exchange contracts would have been decreased by $77.5 million
and
$65.2 million, respectively. Losses or gains from the revaluation or settlement
of the related underlying positions would substantially offset such gains
or
losses on the derivative instruments.
Subsequent
to February 28, 2006, the Company entered into a foreign currency forward
contract in connection with the pending acquisition of Vincor to fix
the U.S. dollar cost of the acquisition and the payment of certain outstanding
indebtedness. The foreign currency forward contract is for the purchase of
Cdn$1.4 billion at a rate of Cdn$1.149 to U.S.$1.00. The Company will be
required to mark the foreign currency forward contract to market with resulting
gains or losses to be recorded in future results of operations. The Company
currently expects to complete the acquisition of Vincor in early June
2006.
The
fair
value of fixed rate debt
is
subject to interest rate risk, credit risk and foreign currency risk. The
estimated fair value of the Company’s total fixed rate debt, including current
maturities, was $1,010.5 million and $1,080.2 million as of February
28,
2006, and February 28, 2005, respectively. A hypothetical 1% increase from
prevailing interest rates as of February 28, 2006, and
February 28, 2005, would have resulted in a decrease in fair value of fixed
interest rate long-term debt by $26.9 million
and
$37.0
million,
respectively.
As
of
February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005, the Company had outstanding five
year
delayed start interest rate swap agreements and five year interest rate swap
agreements, respectively, to minimize interest rate volatility. The swap
agreements fix LIBOR interest rates on $1,200.0 million of the Company’s
floating LIBOR rate debt at an average rate of 4.1% over the five year term.
A
hypothetical 1% increase from prevailing interest rates as of February
28, 2006, and February 28, 2005, would have increased the fair value of the
interest rate swaps by $43.8 million and $53.1 million,
respectively.
In
addition to
the
$1,010.5 million and $1,080.2 million estimated fair value of fixed
rate
debt outstanding as of February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005, respectively,
the Company also had variable rate debt outstanding
(primarily LIBOR based) as of February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005, of
$1,856.1 million and $2,310.6 million, respectively. Using a sensitivity
analysis based on a hypothetical 1% increase in prevailing interest rates
over
a
12-month period,
the approximate increase in cash required for interest as of February 28,
2006,
and February 28, 2005, is $18.6 million and $23.1 million,
respectively.
48
Item
8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
CONSTELLATION
BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FEBRUARY
28, 2006
The
following information is presented in this Annual Report on Form
10-K:
Page
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - KPMG LLP
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - KPMG LLP
Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Consolidated
Balance Sheets - February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005
Consolidated
Statements of Income for the years ended February 28, 2006,
February
28, 2005, and February 29, 2004
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended
February
28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended February 28, 2006,
February
28, 2005, and February 29, 2004
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
Selected
Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)
|
50
51
53
54
55
56
58
59
107
|
49
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The
Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Constellation
Brands, Inc.:
We
have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Constellation Brands,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of February 28, 2006 and 2005, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended February 28, 2006.
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining,
on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Constellation Brands,
Inc.
and subsidiaries as of February 28, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended February 28, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
We
also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Constellation Brands,
Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2006, based
on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO),
and our
report dated May 1, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s
assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial
reporting.
/s/
KPMG
LLP
Rochester,
New York
May
1,
2006
50
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The
Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Constellation
Brands, Inc.:
We
have
audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Constellation
Brands, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as
of February 28, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Constellation Brands, Inc.’s management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s
assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control
over
financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating
the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors
of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may
not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In
our
opinion, management’s assessment that Constellation Brands, Inc. maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2006,
is
fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in
Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion,
Constellation Brands, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2006, based
on
criteria
established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
51
We
also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of
Constellation Brands, Inc. and subsidiaries as of February 28, 2006 and 2005,
and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
February 28, 2006, and our report dated May 1, 2006 expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/
KPMG
LLP
Rochester,
New York
May
1,
2006
52
Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management
of Constellation Brands, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the
“Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of
internal control over financial reporting. This system is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
The
Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation
of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial
reporting can provide only reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Further, because of changes in conditions, effectiveness of
internal controls over financial reporting may vary over time. Our system
contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions are taken to correct
deficiencies as they are identified.
Management
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the system of internal control
over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework issued
by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s system of
internal control over financial reporting was effective as of February 28,
2006.
Management’s
assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included
herein.
53
CONSTELLATION
BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|||||||
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|||||||
February
28,
|
February
28,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash investments
|
$
|
10,878
|
$
|
17,635
|
|||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
771,875
|
849,642
|
|||||
Inventories
|
1,704,432
|
1,607,735
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
213,670
|
259,023
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
2,700,855
|
2,734,035
|
|||||
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
1,425,298
|
1,596,367
|
|||||
GOODWILL
|
2,193,583
|
2,182,669
|
|||||
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS, net
|
883,880
|
945,650
|
|||||
OTHER
ASSETS, net
|
196,938
|
345,451
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
7,400,554
|
$
|
7,804,172
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
|||||||
Notes
payable to banks
|
$
|
79,881
|
$
|
16,475
|
|||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
214,066
|
68,094
|
|||||
Accounts
payable
|
312,839
|
345,254
|
|||||
Accrued
excise taxes
|
76,662
|
74,356
|
|||||
Other
accrued expenses and liabilities
|
614,612
|
633,908
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
1,298,060
|
1,138,087
|
|||||
LONG-TERM
DEBT, less current maturities
|
2,515,780
|
3,204,707
|
|||||
DEFERRED
INCOME TAXES
|
371,246
|
389,886
|
|||||
OTHER
LIABILITIES
|
240,297
|
291,579
|
|||||
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 14)
|
|||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY:
|
|||||||
Preferred
Stock, $.01 par value-
Authorized,
1,000,000 shares;
Issued,
170,500 shares at February 28, 2006, and
February
28, 2005 (Aggregate liquidation preference
of
$172,951 at February 28, 2006)
|
2
|
2
|
|||||
Class
A Common Stock, $.01 par value-
Authorized,
300,000,000 shares;
Issued,
203,651,535 shares at February 28, 2006,
and
199,885,616 shares at February 28, 2005
|
2,037
|
1,999
|
|||||
Class
B Convertible Common Stock, $.01 par value-
Authorized,
30,000,000 shares;
Issued,
28,863,138 shares at February 28, 2006,
and
28,966,060 shares at February 28, 2005
|
289
|
289
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
1,159,421
|
1,097,177
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
1,592,311
|
1,276,853
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
247,427
|
431,843
|
|||||
3,001,487
|
2,808,163
|
||||||
Less-Treasury
stock-
|
|||||||
Class
A Common Stock, 4,474,371 shares at
February
28, 2006, and 4,823,650 shares at
February
28, 2005, at cost
|
(24,042
|
)
|
(25,984
|
)
|
|||
Class
B Convertible Common Stock, 5,005,800 shares
at
February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005, at cost
|
(2,207
|
)
|
(2,207
|
)
|
|||
(26,249
|
)
|
(28,191
|
)
|
||||
Less-Unearned
compensation-restricted stock awards
|
(67
|
)
|
(59
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
2,975,171
|
2,779,913
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
7,400,554
|
$
|
7,804,172
|
|||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
|
54
CONSTELLATION
BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||
For
the Years Ended
|
||||||||||
February
28,
|
February
28,
|
February
29,
|
||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
SALES
|
$
|
5,706,925
|
$
|
5,139,863
|
$
|
4,469,270
|
||||
Less
- Excise taxes
|
(1,103,477
|
)
|
(1,052,225
|
)
|
(916,841
|
)
|
||||
Net
sales
|
4,603,448
|
4,087,638
|
3,552,429
|
|||||||
COST
OF PRODUCT SOLD
|
(3,278,859
|
)
|
(2,947,049
|
)
|
(2,576,641
|
)
|
||||
Gross
profit
|
1,324,589
|
1,140,589
|
975,788
|
|||||||
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES
|
(612,404
|
)
|
(555,694
|
)
|
(457,277
|
)
|
||||
ACQUISITION-RELATED
INTEGRATION COSTS
|
(16,788
|
)
|
(9,421
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
RESTRUCTURING
AND RELATED CHARGES
|
(29,282
|
)
|
(7,578
|
)
|
(31,154
|
)
|
||||
Operating
income
|
666,115
|
567,896
|
487,357
|
|||||||
GAIN
ON CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE OF
DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS
|
-
|
-
|
1,181
|
|||||||
EQUITY
IN EARNINGS OF EQUITY
METHOD
INVESTEES
|
825
|
1,753
|
542
|
|||||||
INTEREST
EXPENSE, net
|
(189,682
|
)
|
(137,675
|
)
|
(144,683
|
)
|
||||
Income
before income taxes
|
477,258
|
431,974
|
344,397
|
|||||||
PROVISION
FOR INCOME TAXES
|
(151,996
|
)
|
(155,510
|
)
|
(123,983
|
)
|
||||
NET
INCOME
|
325,262
|
276,464
|
220,414
|
|||||||
Dividends
on preferred stock
|
(9,804
|
)
|
(9,804
|
)
|
(5,746
|
)
|
||||
INCOME
AVAILABLE TO COMMON
STOCKHOLDERS
|
$
|
315,458
|
$
|
266,660
|
$
|
214,668
|
||||
SHARE
DATA:
|
||||||||||
Earnings
per common share:
|
||||||||||
Basic
- Class A Common Stock
|
$
|
1.44
|
$
|
1.25
|
$
|
1.08
|
||||
Basic
- Class B Common Stock
|
$
|
1.31
|
$
|
1.14
|
$
|
0.98
|
||||
Diluted
|
$
|
1.36
|
$
|
1.19
|
$
|
1.03
|
||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||
Basic
- Class A Common Stock
|
196,907
|
191,489
|
177,267
|
|||||||
Basic
- Class B Common Stock
|
23,904
|
24,043
|
24,137
|
|||||||
Diluted
|
238,707
|
233,060
|
213,897
|
|||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
|
55
CONSTELLATION
BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
|
Common
Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
Treasury
|
Unearned
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
|
Class
A
|
Class
B
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
(Loss)
Income
|
Stock
|
Compensation
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE,
February 28, 2003
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,629
|
$
|
291
|
$
|
468,764
|
$
|
795,525
|
$
|
(59,257
|
)
|
$
|
(31,817
|
)
|
$
|
(151
|
)
|
$
|
1,174,984
|
|||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income for Fiscal 2004
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
220,414
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
220,414
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustments, net of tax
effect
of $6,254
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
410,694
|
-
|
-
|
410,694
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) on cash flow hedges:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
derivative gains, net of tax effect of $15,714
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
38,199
|
-
|
-
|
38,199
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustments, net of tax effect of $507
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,250
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(1,250
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
gain recognized in other comprehensive income
|
36,949
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on marketable equity securities, net
of
tax effect of $185
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(432
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(432
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Minimum
pension liability adjustment, net of tax
effect
of $6,888
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(15,652
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(15,652
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax
|
431,559
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
651,973
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of 27,720 Class B Convertible Common
shares
to Class A Common shares
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of 5,224,622 Class A stock options
|
-
|
52
|
-
|
36,183
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
36,235
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Employee
stock purchases of 331,552 treasury shares
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,658
|
-
|
-
|
1,824
|
-
|
3,482
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of 19,600,000 Class A Common shares
|
-
|
196
|
-
|
261,020
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
261,216
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of 170,500 Preferred shares
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
164,868
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
164,870
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dividend
on Preferred shares
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(5,746
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(5,746
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of 6,577,826 Class A Common shares
in
connection with Hardy Acquisition
|
-
|
66
|
-
|
77,177
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
77,243
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of unearned restricted stock compensation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
101
|
101
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefit on Class A stock options exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
13,029
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
13,029
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefit on disposition of employee stock purchases
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
82
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
82
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
150
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
150
|
|||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE,
February 29, 2004
|
2
|
1,943
|
291
|
1,022,931
|
1,010,193
|
372,302
|
(29,993
|
)
|
(50
|
)
|
2,377,619
|
|||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income for Fiscal 2005
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
276,464
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
276,464
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustments, net of tax
effect
of $17,056
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
79,977
|
-
|
-
|
79,977
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) on cash flow hedges:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
derivative gains, net of tax effect of $2,749
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,150
|
-
|
-
|
2,150
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustments, net of tax effect of $575
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,783
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(1,783
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
gain recognized in other comprehensive income
|
367
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
(loss) gain on marketable equity securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on marketable equity securities, net
of
tax effect of $18
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(42
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(42
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustments, net of tax effect of $203
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
474
|
-
|
-
|
474
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
gain recognized in other comprehensive income
|
432
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum
pension liability adjustment, net of tax
effect
of $8,641
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(21,235
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(21,235
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax
|
59,541
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
336,005
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of 163,200 Class B Convertible Common
shares
to Class A Common shares
|
-
|
2
|
(2
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of 5,421,978 Class A stock options
|
-
|
54
|
-
|
48,345
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
48,399
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Employee
stock purchases of 348,270 treasury shares
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,728
|
-
|
-
|
1,962
|
-
|
4,690
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dividend
on Preferred shares
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(9,804
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(9,804
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of 5,330 restricted Class A Common shares
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
71
|
-
|
-
|
30
|
(101
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of unearned restricted stock compensation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
92
|
92
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefit on Class A stock options exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
22,963
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
22,963
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefit on disposition of employee stock purchases
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
122
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
122
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
17
|
-
|
-
|
(190
|
)
|
-
|
(173
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
BALANCE,
February 28, 2005
|
$
|
2
|
$
|
1,999
|
$
|
289
|
$
|
1,097,177
|
$
|
1,276,853
|
$
|
431,843
|
$
|
(28,191
|
)
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
$
|
2,779,913
|
56
CONSTELLATION
BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
|
Common
Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
Treasury
|
Unearned
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
|
Class
A
|
Class
B
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
(Loss)
Income
|
Stock
|
Compensation
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE,
February 28, 2005
|
$
|
2
|
$
|
1,999
|
$
|
289
|
$
|
1,097,177
|
$
|
1,276,853
|
$
|
431,843
|
$
|
(28,191
|
)
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
$
|
2,779,913
|
||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income for Fiscal 2006
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
325,262
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
325,262
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustments, net of tax
effect
of $6,808
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(159,242
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(159,242
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) on cash flow hedges:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
derivative gains, net of tax effect of $3,268
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
90
|
-
|
-
|
90
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustments, net of tax effect
of
$4,211
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(6,368
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(6,368
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
loss recognized in other comprehensive income
|
(6,278
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on marketable equity securities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(4
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(4
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Minimum
pension liability adjustment, net of tax
effect
of $8,248
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(18,892
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(18,892
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
(184,416
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
140,846
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of 102,922 Class B Convertible Common
shares
to Class A Common shares
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of 3,662,997 Class A stock options
|
-
|
38
|
-
|
31,314
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
31,352
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Employee
stock purchases of 342,129 treasury shares
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4,326
|
-
|
-
|
1,903
|
-
|
6,229
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Acceleration
of 5,130,778 Class A stock options
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
7,324
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
7,324
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dividend
on Preferred shares
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(9,804
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(9,804
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of 7,150 restricted Class A Common shares
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
161
|
-
|
-
|
39
|
(200
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of unearned restricted stock compensation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
192
|
192
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefit on Class A stock options exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
19,014
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
19,014
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefit on disposition of employee stock purchases
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
120
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
120
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(15
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(15
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
BALANCE,
February 28, 2006
|
$
|
2
|
$
|
2,037
|
$
|
289
|
$
|
1,159,421
|
$
|
1,592,311
|
$
|
247,427
|
$
|
(26,249
|
)
|
$
|
(67
|
)
|
$
|
2,975,171
|
||||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these
statements.
|
57
CONSTELLATION
BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||
For
the Years Ended
|
||||||||||
February
28,
|
February
28,
|
February
29,
|
||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
325,262
|
$
|
276,464
|
$
|
220,414
|
||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating
activities:
|
||||||||||
Depreciation
of property, plant and equipment
|
119,946
|
93,139
|
80,079
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from early termination of derivative contracts
|
48,776
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Deferred
tax provision
|
30,116
|
48,274
|
31,398
|
|||||||
Amortization
of intangible and other assets
|
8,152
|
10,516
|
21,875
|
|||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
7,516
|
109
|
233
|
|||||||
Loss
on disposal of assets
|
2,188
|
2,442
|
5,127
|
|||||||
Amortization
of discount on long-term debt
|
77
|
72
|
93
|
|||||||
Equity
in earnings of equity method investees
|
(825
|
)
|
(1,753
|
)
|
(542
|
)
|
||||
Non-cash
portion of loss on extinguishment of debt
|
-
|
23,181
|
800
|
|||||||
Gain
on change in fair value of derivative instruments
|
-
|
-
|
(1,181
|
)
|
||||||
Change
in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects
from
purchases and sales of businesses:
|
||||||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
44,191
|
(100,280
|
)
|
(63,036
|
)
|
|||||
Inventories
|
(121,887
|
)
|
(74,466
|
)
|
96,051
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
7,267
|
(8,100
|
)
|
2,192
|
||||||
Accounts
payable
|
(1,241
|
)
|
11,388
|
(61,647
|
)
|
|||||
Accrued
excise taxes
|
3,987
|
25,405
|
7,658
|
|||||||
Other
accrued expenses and liabilities
|
(35,105
|
)
|
11,607
|
11,417
|
||||||
Other,
net
|
(2,449
|
)
|
2,702
|
(10,624
|
)
|
|||||
Total
adjustments
|
110,709
|
44,236
|
119,893
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
435,971
|
320,700
|
340,307
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||
Purchases
of property, plant and equipment
|
(132,498
|
)
|
(119,664
|
)
|
(105,094
|
)
|
||||
Purchases
of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
(45,893
|
)
|
(1,052,471
|
)
|
(1,069,470
|
)
|
||||
Payment
of accrued earn-out amount
|
(3,088
|
)
|
(2,618
|
)
|
(2,035
|
)
|
||||
Investment
in equity method investee
|
(2,723
|
)
|
(86,121
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sales of assets
|
119,679
|
13,771
|
13,449
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from sales of equity method investments
|
35,953
|
9,884
|
-
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from sales of businesses
|
17,861
|
-
|
3,814
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from sales of marketable equity securities
|
-
|
14,359
|
849
|
|||||||
Other
investing activities
|
(4,849
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(15,558
|
)
|
(1,222,860
|
)
|
(1,158,487
|
)
|
||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||
Principal
payments of long-term debt
|
(527,593
|
)
|
(1,488,686
|
)
|
(1,282,274
|
)
|
||||
Payment
of preferred stock dividends
|
(9,804
|
)
|
(9,804
|
)
|
(3,295
|
)
|
||||
Net
proceeds from (repayment of) notes payable
|
63,802
|
(45,858
|
)
|
(1,113
|
)
|
|||||
Exercise
of employee stock options
|
31,504
|
48,241
|
36,017
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of long-term debt
|
9,625
|
2,400,000
|
1,600,000
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from employee stock purchases
|
6,229
|
4,690
|
3,481
|
|||||||
Payment
of issuance costs of long-term debt
|
-
|
(24,403
|
)
|
(33,748
|
)
|
|||||
Proceeds
from equity offerings, net of fees
|
-
|
-
|
426,086
|
|||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(426,237
|
)
|
884,180
|
745,154
|
||||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash investments
|
(933
|
)
|
(1,521
|
)
|
96,352
|
|||||
NET
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH INVESTMENTS
|
(6,757
|
)
|
(19,501
|
)
|
23,326
|
|||||
CASH
AND CASH INVESTMENTS, beginning of year
|
17,635
|
37,136
|
13,810
|
|||||||
CASH
AND CASH INVESTMENTS, end of year
|
$
|
10,878
|
$
|
17,635
|
$
|
37,136
|
||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||||
Cash
paid during the year for:
|
||||||||||
Interest
|
$
|
198,787
|
$
|
124,899
|
$
|
137,359
|
||||
Income
taxes
|
$
|
42,909
|
$
|
83,675
|
$
|
76,990
|
||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH INVESTING
AND
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||
Fair
value of assets acquired, including cash acquired
|
$
|
49,554
|
$
|
1,938,035
|
$
|
1,776,064
|
||||
Liabilities
assumed
|
(1,341
|
)
|
(878,134
|
)
|
(621,578
|
)
|
||||
Net
assets acquired
|
48,213
|
1,059,901
|
1,154,486
|
|||||||
Less
- note payable issuance
|
(2,320
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Less
- stock issuance
|
-
|
-
|
(77,243
|
)
|
||||||
Less
- direct acquisition costs accrued or previously paid
|
-
|
(985
|
)
|
(5,939
|
)
|
|||||
Less
- cash acquired
|
-
|
(6,445
|
)
|
(1,834
|
)
|
|||||
Net
cash paid for purchases of businesses
|
$
|
45,893
|
$
|
1,052,471
|
$
|
1,069,470
|
||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
|
58
CONSTELLATION
BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FEBRUARY
28, 2006
1. SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Description
of business -
Constellation
Brands, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) operate primarily in the
beverage alcohol industry. The Company is a leading international producer
and
marketer of beverage alcohol with a broad portfolio of brands across the wine,
imported beer and spirits categories. The Company has the largest wine business
in the world and is the largest multi-category supplier of beverage alcohol
in
the United States (“U.S.”); a leading producer and exporter of wine from
Australia and New Zealand; and both a major producer and independent drinks
wholesaler in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”). In North America, the Company
distributes its products through wholesale distributors. In Australia, the
Company distributes its products directly to off-premise accounts, such as
major
retail chains, on-premise accounts, such as hotels and restaurants, and large
wholesalers. In the U.K., the Company distributes its products directly to
off-premise accounts, such as major retail chains, and to other wholesalers.
Through the Company’s U.K. wholesale business, the Company distributes its
branded products and those of other major drinks companies to on-premise
accounts: pubs, clubs, hotels and restaurants.
Principles
of consolidation -
The
consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of
Constellation Brands, Inc. and all of its subsidiaries. All intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Management’s
use of estimates -
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue
recognition -
Sales
are
recognized when title passes to the customer, which is generally when the
product is shipped. Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are
classified as sales. Sales reflect reductions attributable to consideration
given to customers in various customer incentive programs, including pricing
discounts on single transactions, volume discounts, promotional and advertising
allowances, coupons, and rebates.
Cost
of product sold -
The
types
of costs included in cost of product sold are raw materials, packaging
materials, manufacturing costs, plant administrative support and overheads,
and
freight and warehouse costs (including distribution network costs). Distribution
network costs include inbound freight charges and outbound shipping and handling
costs, purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing and
internal transfer costs.
59
Selling,
general and administrative expenses -
The
types
of costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses consist
predominately of advertising and non-manufacturing administrative and overhead
costs. Distribution network costs are not included in the Company’s selling,
general and administrative expenses, but are included in cost of product sold
as
described above. The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred, shown
or
distributed. Prepaid advertising costs at February 28, 2006, and February 28,
2005, were not material. Advertising expense for the years ended February 28,
2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004, was $142.4 million, $139.1
million and $117.8 million, respectively.
Foreign currency
translation -
The
“functional currency” for translating the accounts of the Company’s operations
outside the U.S. is the local currency. The translation from the applicable
foreign currencies to U.S. dollars is performed for balance sheet accounts
using
exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense
accounts using a weighted average exchange rate during the period. The resulting
translation adjustments are recorded as a component of Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss) (“AOCI”). Gains or losses resulting from foreign
currency denominated transactions are included in selling, general and
administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The
Company engages in foreign currency denominated transactions with customers,
suppliers and non-U.S. subsidiaries. Aggregate foreign currency transaction
net
gains were $5.1 million, $5.3 million and $16.6 million for the years ended
February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004,
respectively.
Cash
investments -
Cash
investments consist of highly liquid investments with an original maturity
when
purchased of three months or less and are stated at cost, which approximates
market value. The amounts at February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005, are
not
significant.
Allowance
for doubtful accounts -
The
Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses
resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The
majority of the accounts receivable balance is generated from sales to
independent distributors with whom the Company has a predetermined collection
date arranged through electronic funds transfer. The allowance for doubtful
accounts was $13.5 million and $16.3 million as of February 28, 2006, and
February 28, 2005, respectively.
Fair
value of financial instruments -
To
meet
the reporting requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” the Company
calculates the fair value of financial instruments using quoted market prices
whenever available. When quoted market prices are not available, the Company
uses standard pricing models for various types of financial instruments (such
as
forwards, options, swaps, etc.) which take into account the present value of
estimated future cash flows.
60
The
carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments
are summarized as follows:
February
28, 2006
|
February
28, 2005
|
||||||||||||
Carrying
Amount
|
Fair
Value
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
Assets:
|
|||||||||||||
Cash
and cash investments
|
$
|
10,878
|
$
|
10,878
|
$
|
17,635
|
$
|
17,635
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable
|
$
|
771,875
|
$
|
771,875
|
$
|
849,642
|
$
|
849,642
|
|||||
Investment
in marketable
equity
securities
|
$
|
27
|
$
|
27
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
|||||
Currency
forward contracts
|
$
|
11,677
|
$
|
11,677
|
$
|
45,606
|
$
|
45,606
|
|||||
Interest
rate swap contracts
|
$
|
1,429
|
$
|
1,429
|
$
|
14,684
|
$
|
14,684
|
|||||
Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||
Notes
payable to banks
|
$
|
79,881
|
$
|
79,881
|
$
|
16,475
|
$
|
16,475
|
|||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
312,839
|
$
|
312,839
|
$
|
345,254
|
$
|
345,254
|
|||||
Long-term
debt, including
current
portion
|
$
|
2,729,846
|
$
|
2,786,720
|
$
|
3,272,801
|
$
|
3,374,337
|
|||||
Currency
forward contracts
|
$
|
3,960
|
$
|
3,960
|
$
|
2,061
|
$
|
2,061
|
The
following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each
class of financial instruments:
Cash
and cash investments, accounts receivable and accounts payable:
The
carrying amounts approximate fair value due to the short maturity of these
instruments.
Investment
in marketable equity securities:
The
fair value is estimated based on quoted market prices.
Currency
forward contracts:
The fair
value is estimated based on quoted market prices.
Interest
rate swap contracts:
The fair
value is estimated based on quoted market prices.
Notes
payable to banks: These
instruments are variable interest rate bearing notes for which the carrying
value approximates the fair value.
Long-term
debt:
The
senior credit facility is subject to variable interest rates which are
frequently reset; accordingly, the carrying value of this debt approximates
its
fair value. The fair value of the remaining long-term debt, which is all fixed
rate, is estimated by discounting cash flows using interest rates currently
available for debt with similar terms and maturities.
Derivative
instruments -
As
a
multinational company, the Company is exposed to market risk from changes in
foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates that could affect the
Company’s results of operations and financial condition. The amount of
volatility realized will vary based upon the effectiveness and level of
derivative instruments outstanding during a particular period of time, as well
as the currency and interest rate market movements during that same
period.
61
The
Company enters into derivative instruments, primarily interest rate swaps and
foreign currency forwards, to manage interest rate and foreign currency risks.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (“SFAS
No. 133”), “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as
amended, the Company recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities
on the balance sheet and measures those instruments at fair value. The fair
values of the Company’s derivative instruments change with fluctuations in
interest rates and/or currency rates and are expected to offset changes in
the
values of the underlying exposures. The Company’s derivative instruments are
held solely to hedge economic exposures. The Company follows strict policies
to
manage interest rate and foreign currency risks, including prohibitions on
derivative market-making or other speculative activities. As of February 28,
2006, and February 28, 2005, the Company had foreign exchange contracts
outstanding with a notional value of $1,254.7 million and $601.6 million,
respectively. In addition, as of February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005,
the
Company had interest rate swap agreements outstanding with a notional value
of
$1,200.0 million (see Note 9).
To
qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133, the details of the hedging
relationship must be formally documented at inception of the arrangement,
including the risk management objective, hedging strategy, hedged item, specific
risk that is being hedged, the derivative instrument, how effectiveness is
being
assessed and how ineffectiveness will be measured. The derivative must be highly
effective in offsetting either changes in the fair value or cash flows, as
appropriate, of the risk being hedged. Effectiveness is evaluated on a
retrospective and prospective basis based on quantitative measures.
Certain
of the Company’s derivative instruments do not qualify for SFAS No. 133 hedge
accounting treatment; for others, the Company chooses not to maintain the
required documentation to apply hedge accounting treatment. These instruments
are used to hedge the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in the value of foreign
currency denominated receivables and payables, foreign currency investments,
primarily consisting of loans to subsidiaries, and cash flows related primarily
to repatriation of those loans or investments. Forward contracts, generally
less
than 12 months in duration, are used to hedge some of these risks. The Company’s
derivative policy permits the use of non-SFAS No. 133 hedging when the hedging
instrument is settled within the fiscal quarter or offsets a recognized balance
sheet exposure. In these circumstances, the mark to fair value is reported
currently through earnings in selling, general and administrative expenses
in
the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
Furthermore,
for derivative instruments which qualify for hedge accounting treatment, when
it
is determined that a derivative is not, or has ceased to be, highly effective
as
a hedge, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively. The Company
discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when (i) the derivative is no longer
highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of a hedged item;
(ii)
the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; (iii) it is no
longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur; or (iv) management
determines that designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer
appropriate.
Cash
flow hedges:
The
Company is exposed to foreign denominated cash flow fluctuations in connection
with sales to third parties, intercompany sales, available for sale securities
and intercompany financing arrangements. Foreign currency forward contracts
are
used to hedge certain of these risks. In addition, the Company utilizes interest
rate swaps to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates. Derivatives
managing the Company’s cash flow exposures generally mature within three years
or less, with a maximum maturity of five years. Throughout the term of the
designated cash flow hedge relationship, but at least quarterly, a retrospective
evaluation and prospective assessment of hedge effectiveness is performed.
In
the event the relationship is no longer effective, the fair market value of
the
hedging derivative instrument is recognized immediately in the Company’s
Consolidated Statements of Income. In conjunction with its effectiveness
testing, the Company also evaluates ineffectiveness associated with the hedge
relationship. Resulting ineffectiveness, if any, is recognized immediately
in
the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
62
The
Company records the fair value of its foreign exchange contracts qualifying
for
cash flow hedge accounting treatment in its consolidated balance sheet with
the
related gain or loss on those contracts deferred in stockholders’ equity (as a
component of AOCI). These deferred gains or losses are recognized in the
Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income in the same period in which the
underlying hedged items are recognized, and on the same line item as the
underlying hedged items. However, to the extent that any derivative instrument
is not considered to be perfectly effective in offsetting the change in the
value of the hedged item, the amount related to the ineffective portion of
this
derivative instrument is immediately recognized in the Company’s Consolidated
Statements of Income in selling, general and administrative
expenses.
The
Company expects $13.4 million of net gains to be reclassified from AOCI to
earnings within the next 12 months. The amount of hedge ineffectiveness
associated with the Company’s designated cash flow hedge instruments recognized
in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income during the years ended
February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004, was not material.
All components of the Company’s derivative instruments’ gains or losses are
included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. In addition, the amount
of
net gains reclassified into earnings as a result of the discontinuance of cash
flow hedge accounting due to the probability that the original forecasted
transaction would not occur by the end of the originally specified time period
was not material for the years ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005,
and
February 29, 2004.
Fair
value hedges:
Fair
value hedges are hedges that offset the risk of changes in the fair values
of
recorded assets and liabilities, and firm commitments. The Company records
changes in fair value of derivative instruments which are designated and deemed
effective as fair value hedges, in earnings offset by the corresponding changes
in the fair value of the hedged items.
The
amount of hedge ineffectiveness associated with the Company’s designated fair
value hedge instruments recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of
Income for the years ended February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005, was not
material. The Company did not have any fair value hedge instruments outstanding
for the year ended February 29, 2004. All components of the Company’s derivative
instruments’ gains or losses are included in the assessment of hedge
effectiveness. There were no gains or losses recognized in earnings resulting
from a hedged firm commitment no longer qualifying as a fair value
hedge.
Net
investment hedges:
Net
investment hedges are hedges that use derivative instruments or non-derivative
instruments to hedge the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a
foreign operation. The Company manages currency exposures resulting from its
net
investments in foreign subsidiaries principally with debt denominated in the
related foreign currency. Gains and losses on these instruments are recorded
as
foreign currency translation adjustments in AOCI. Currently, the Company has
designated the Sterling Senior Notes and the Sterling Series C Senior Notes
(as
defined in Note 9) totaling £155.0 million aggregate principal amount as a hedge
against the net investment in the Company’s U.K. subsidiary. For the years ended
February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004, net gains (losses)
of $25.9 million, ($8.1) million and ($45.9) million, respectively, are included
in foreign currency translation adjustments within AOCI.
63
Counterparty
credit risk:
Counterparty
credit risk relates to losses the Company could incur if a counterparty defaults
on a derivative contract. The Company manages exposure to counterparty credit
risk by requiring specified minimum credit standards and diversification of
counterparties. The Company enters into master agreements with its
counterparties that allow netting of certain exposures in order to manage this
risk. All of the Company’s counterpart exposures are with counterparts that have
investment grade ratings. The Company has procedures to monitor the credit
exposure for both mark to market and future potential exposures.
Inventories
-
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost (computed in accordance with the first-in,
first-out method) or market. Elements of cost include materials, labor and
overhead and are classified as follows:
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Raw
materials and supplies
|
$
|
82,366
|
$
|
71,562
|
|||
In-process
inventories
|
1,081,304
|
957,567
|
|||||
Finished
case goods
|
540,762
|
578,606
|
|||||
$
|
1,704,432
|
$
|
1,607,735
|
A
substantial portion of barreled whiskey and brandy will not be sold within
one
year because of the duration of the aging process. All barreled whiskey and
brandy are classified as in-process inventories and are included in current
assets, in accordance with industry practice. Bulk wine inventories are also
included as in-process inventories within current assets, in accordance with
the
general practices of the wine industry, although a portion of such inventories
may be aged for periods greater than one year. Warehousing, insurance, ad
valorem taxes and other carrying charges applicable to barreled whiskey and
brandy held for aging are included in inventory costs.
The
Company assesses the valuation of its inventories and reduces the carrying
value
of those inventories that are obsolete or in excess of the Company’s forecasted
usage to their estimated net realizable value. The Company estimates the net
realizable value of such inventories based on analyses and assumptions
including, but not limited to, historical usage, future demand and market
requirements. Reductions to the carrying value of inventories are recorded
in
cost of product sold. If the future demand for the Company’s products is
less favorable than the Company’s forecasts, then the value of the inventories
may be required to be reduced, which would result in additional expense to
the
Company and affect its results of operations.
Property,
plant and equipment -
Property,
plant and equipment is stated at cost. Major additions and betterments are
charged to property accounts, while maintenance and repairs are charged to
operations as incurred. The cost of properties sold or otherwise disposed of
and
the related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts at the
time of disposal and resulting gains and losses are included as a component
of
operating income.
Depreciation
-
Depreciation
is computed primarily using the straight-line method over the following
estimated useful lives:
Depreciable
Life in Years
|
|
Land
improvements
|
15
to 32
|
Vineyards
|
16
to 26
|
Buildings
and improvements
|
10
to 44
|
Machinery
and equipment
|
3
to 35
|
Motor
vehicles
|
3
to 7
|
64
Goodwill
and other intangible assets -
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (“SFAS No.
142”), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” the Company reviews its goodwill
and indefinite lived intangible assets annually for impairment, or sooner,
if
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset
may not be recoverable. The Company uses December 31 as its annual impairment
test measurement date. Indefinite lived intangible assets consist principally
of
trademarks. Intangible assets determined to have a finite life, primarily
distribution agreements, are amortized over their estimated useful lives and
are
subject to review for impairment in accordance with the provisions of SFAS
No.
144 (as defined below). Note 6 provides a summary of intangible assets
segregated between amortizable and nonamortizable amounts. No instances of
impairment were noted on the Company’s goodwill and other intangible assets for
the years ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29,
2004.
Other
assets -
Other
assets include the following: (i) investments in equity method investees which
are carried under the equity method of accounting (see Note
7);
(ii)
deferred financing costs which are stated at cost, net of accumulated
amortization, and are amortized on an effective interest basis over the term
of
the related debt; (iii) deferred tax assets which are stated at cost,
net
of
valuation allowances
(see
Note 10);
and
(iv) derivative assets which are stated at fair value (see discussion
above).
Long-lived
assets impairment -
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (“SFAS No.
144”), “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the
Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted cash
flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset
exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge
is
recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds
its
fair value. Assets held for sale are reported at the lower of the carrying
amount or fair value less costs to sell
and
are no longer depreciated.
Pursuant
to this policy and in connection with the restructuring plan of the
Constellation Wines segment
(see
Note 20), the Company recorded losses of $2.1 million on the disposal of certain
property, plant and equipment during the year ended February 29, 2004. These
losses are included in restructuring and related charges on the Company’s
Consolidated Statements of Income as they are part of the restructuring plan.
No
losses were recorded for the years ended February 28, 2006, and February 28,
2005.
Income
taxes -
The
Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes.
This
method accounts for deferred income taxes by applying statutory rates in effect
at the balance sheet date to the difference between the financial reporting
and
tax bases of assets and liabilities.
Environmental
-
Environmental
expenditures that relate to current operations or to an existing condition
caused by past operations, and which do not contribute to current or future
revenue generation, are expensed. Liabilities for environmental risks or
components thereof are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial
efforts are probable, and the cost can be reasonably estimated. Generally,
the
timing of these accruals coincides with the completion of a feasibility study
or
the Company’s commitment to a formal plan of action. Liabilities for
environmental costs were not material at February 28, 2006, and February 28,
2005.
65
Earnings
per common share -
Effective
June 1, 2004, the Company adopted EITF Issue No. 03-6 (“EITF No. 03-6”),
“Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No.
128.” EITF No. 03-6 clarifies what is meant by a “participating security,”
provides guidance on applying the two-class method for computing earnings per
share, and requires affected companies to retroactively restate earnings per
share amounts for all periods presented.
The
Company has two classes of common stock: Class A Common Stock and Class B
Convertible Common Stock. With respect to dividend rights, the Class A Common
Stock is entitled to cash dividends of at least ten percent higher than those
declared and paid on the Class B Convertible Common Stock. Therefore, under
EITF
No. 03-6, the Class B Convertible Common Stock is considered a participating
security requiring the use of the two-class method for the computation of net
income per share - basic, rather than the if-converted method which
was previously used. In addition, the shares of Class B Convertible Common
Stock are considered to be participating convertible securities since the shares
of Class B Convertible Common Stock are convertible into shares of Class A
Common Stock on a one-to-one basis at any time at the option of the holder.
The
two-class computation method for each period reflects the amount of allocated
undistributed earnings per share computed using the participation percentage
which reflects the minimum dividend rights of each class of stock. Earnings
per
share - basic reflects the application of EITF No. 03-6 and has been computed
using the two-class method for all periods presented. Earnings per share -
diluted continues to be computed using the if-converted method (see Note
16).
Basic
earnings per common share excludes the effect of common stock equivalents and
is
computed using the two-class computation method. Diluted earnings per common
share reflects the potential dilution that could result if securities or other
contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
Diluted earnings per common share assumes the exercise of stock options using
the treasury stock method and the conversion of Class B Convertible Common
Stock
and Preferred Stock (as defined in Note 15) using
the
if-converted method.
Stock-based
employee compensation plans
-
As
of
February 28, 2006, the Company has four stock-based employee compensation plans,
which are described more fully in
Note
15. The
Company
applies the intrinsic value method described in Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25 (“APB No. 25”), “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and
related interpretations in accounting for these plans. In accordance with APB
No. 25, the compensation cost for stock options is recognized in income based
on
the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at the grant date
of
the award or other measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to
acquire the stock. Options granted under the Company’s stock option plans have
an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock
on
the date of grant; therefore, no incremental compensation expense has been
recognized for grants made to employees under the Company’s stock option plans.
The Company utilizes the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 (“SFAS No. 123”), “Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation,” as amended.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
123 (revised 2004) (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), “Share-Based Payment,” which replaces
SFAS No. 123 and supersedes APB No. 25. SFAS No. 123(R) requires the cost
resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the
financial
statements. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on March 1, 2006. See Note
23
for additional discussion regarding SFAS No. 123(R).
66
Stock-based
awards, primarily stock options, granted by the Company are subject to specific
vesting conditions, generally time vesting, or at the date the employee retires
(as defined by the stock option plan), if earlier. Under APB No. 25, as the
exercise price is equal to the market value of the underlying common stock
on
the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized for the granting of
these stock options. Under the disclosure only provisions of SFAS No. 123,
for
stock-based awards that specify an employee vests in the award upon retirement,
the Company accounts for the compensation expense ratably over the stated
vesting period. If the employee retires before the end of the stated vesting
period, then any remaining unrecognized compensation expense is accounted for
at
the date of retirement. The Company will continue to apply this approach for
any
awards granted prior to the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on March 1,
2006, and for the unrecognized compensation expense associated with the
remaining portion of the then unvested outstanding awards. The remaining portion
of the unvested outstanding awards as of February 28, 2006, is not
material.
With
the
Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on March 1, 2006, the Company revised its
approach for recognition of compensation expense for all new stock-based awards
that accelerate vesting upon retirement. Under this revised approach,
compensation expense will be recognized immediately for awards granted to
retirement-eligible employees or over the period from the date of grant to
the
date of retirement-eligibility if that is expected to occur during the requisite
service period.
On
February 16, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the accelerated
vesting of certain unvested stock options previously awarded under the Company’s
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and Incentive Stock Option Plan. Nearly all
of
the accelerated vesting was for stock options awarded with a performance-based
acceleration feature. The acceleration of these stock options will enable the
Company to more accurately forecast future compensation expense and to reduce
related earnings volatility. As a result of the accelerated vesting, options
to
purchase 5,130,778 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, of which 98.7%
were in-the-money, became fully exercisable. The acceleration eliminates future
compensation expense of approximately $38.8 million that would have otherwise
been recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income beginning
March 1, 2006, through February 28, 2010. Also on February 16, 2006, the Company
announced its worldwide wines reorganization (see Note 20). As a result of
these foregoing actions, the Company recorded $7.3 million of stock-based
employee compensation expense during the year ended February 28, 2006, of which
$6.9 million is recorded as Restructuring and Related Charges and $0.4 million
is recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s
Consolidated Statements of Income.
The
following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share
as
if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No.
123
to stock-based employee compensation:
For
the Years Ended
|
||||||||||
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
February
29,
2004
|
||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||
Net
income, as reported
|
$
|
325,262
|
$
|
276,464
|
$
|
220,414
|
||||
Add:
Stock-based employee
compensation
expense included in
reported
net income, net of related
tax
effects
|
4,801
|
69
|
160
|
|||||||
Deduct:
Total stock-based employee
compensation
expense determined
under
fair value based method for
all
awards, net of related tax effects
|
(38,718
|
)
|
(33,461
|
)
|
(16,582
|
)
|
||||
Pro
forma net income
|
$
|
291,345
|
$
|
243,072
|
$
|
203,992
|
67
For
the Years Ended
|
||||||||||
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
February
29,
2004
|
||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||
Earnings
per common share - basic:
|
||||||||||
Class
A Common Stock, as reported
|
$
|
1.44
|
$
|
1.25
|
$
|
1.08
|
||||
Class
B Convertible Common Stock,
as
reported
|
$
|
1.31
|
$
|
1.14
|
$
|
0.98
|
||||
Class
A Common Stock, pro forma
|
$
|
1.29
|
$
|
1.09
|
$
|
1.00
|
||||
Class
B Convertible Common Stock,
pro
forma
|
$
|
1.17
|
$
|
0.99
|
$
|
0.90
|
||||
Earnings
per common share - diluted,
as
reported
|
$
|
1.36
|
$
|
1.19
|
$
|
1.03
|
||||
Earnings
per common share - diluted,
pro
forma
|
$
|
1.21
|
$
|
1.04
|
$
|
0.95
|
2. RECENTLY
ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:
On
October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act (“AJCA”) was signed into law.
The AJCA includes a special one-time 85% dividends received deduction for
certain foreign earnings that are repatriated. In December 2004, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 109-2
(“FSP FAS 109-2”), “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings
Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.” FSP FAS
109-2 provides accounting and disclosure guidance for this repatriation
provision (see Note 10).
Effective
September 1, 2005, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 153 (“SFAS No. 153”), “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets - an
amendment of APB Opinion No. 29.” SFAS No. 153 amends Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 29 (“APB No. 29”), “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions,”
to eliminate the exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges
of similar productive assets and replace it with a general exception from fair
value measurement for exchanges that do not have commercial substance. SFAS
No.
153 specifies that a nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future
cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of
the
exchange. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 did not have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Effective
February 28, 2006, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 47 (“FIN No.
47”), “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143.” FIN No. 47 clarifies the term
conditional asset retirement obligation as used in FASB Statement No. 143,
“Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” A conditional asset retirement
obligation is an unconditional legal obligation to perform an asset retirement
activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on
a
future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. Therefore,
an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a
conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability
can
be reasonably estimated. The adoption of FIN No. 47 did not have a material
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
68
3. ACQUISITIONS:
Acquisition
of Robert Mondavi -
On
December 22, 2004, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock
of
The Robert Mondavi Corporation (“Robert Mondavi”), a leading premium wine
producer based in Napa, California. Through this transaction, the Company
acquired various additional winery and vineyard interests, and, additionally
produces, markets and sells premium, super-premium and fine California wines
under the Woodbridge
by Robert Mondavi, Robert Mondavi Private Selection and Robert Mondavi Winery
brand names.
As a
result of the Robert Mondavi acquisition, the Company acquired an ownership
interest in Opus One, a joint venture owned equally by Robert Mondavi and Baron
Philippe de Rothschild, S.A. During September 2005, the Company’s president and
Baroness Philippine de Rothschild announced an agreement to maintain equal
ownership of Opus One. Opus One produces fine wines at its Napa Valley
winery.
The
acquisition of Robert Mondavi supports the Company’s strategy of strengthening
the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall
growth in the premium, super-premium and fine wine categories. The Company
believes that the acquired Robert Mondavi brand names have strong brand
recognition globally. The vast majority of sales from these brands are generated
in the United States. The Company is leveraging the Robert Mondavi brands in
the
United States through its selling, marketing and distribution infrastructure.
The Company also intends to further expand distribution for the Robert Mondavi
brands in Europe through its Constellation Europe infrastructure.
The
Robert Mondavi acquisition supports the Company’s strategy of growth and breadth
across categories and geographies, and strengthens its competitive position
in
its core markets. The
Robert Mondavi acquisition provides the Company with a greater presence in
the
growing premium, super-premium and fine wine sectors within the United States
and the ability to capitalize on the broader geographic distribution in
strategic international markets. In
particular, the Company believes there are growth opportunities for premium,
super-premium and fine wines in the United Kingdom and other “new world” wine
markets.
Total
consideration paid in cash to the Robert Mondavi shareholders was $1,030.7
million. Additionally, the Company incurred direct acquisition costs of $12.0
million. The purchase price was financed with borrowings under the Company’s
2004 Credit Agreement (as defined in Note 9).
In
accordance with the purchase method of accounting, the acquired net assets
are
recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition. The purchase price was based
primarily on the estimated future operating results of the Robert Mondavi
business, including the factors described above, as well as an estimated benefit
from operating cost synergies.
The
results of operations of the Robert Mondavi business are reported in the
Constellation Wines segment and have been included in the Consolidated
Statements of Income since the acquisition date.
The
following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in the Robert Mondavi acquisition at the date of
acquisition, as adjusted for the final appraisal:
(in
thousands)
|
||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
513,782
|
||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
438,140
|
|||
Other
assets
|
124,450
|
|||
Trademarks
|
138,000
|
|||
Goodwill
|
634,203
|
|||
Total
assets acquired
|
1,848,575
|
|||
Current
liabilities
|
310,919
|
|||
Long-term
liabilities
|
494,995
|
|||
Total
liabilities assumed
|
805,914
|
|||
Net
assets acquired
|
$
|
1,042,661
|
69
The
trademarks are not subject to amortization. None of the goodwill is expected
to
be deductible for tax purposes.
Following
the Robert Mondavi acquisition, the Company sold certain of the acquired
vineyard properties and related assets, investments accounted for under the
equity method, and other winery properties and related assets, during the
years
ended February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005. The Company realized net
proceeds of $170.8 million from the sale of these assets during the year
ended
February 28, 2006. Amounts realized during the year ended February 28, 2005,
were not material. No gain or loss has been recognized upon the sale of these
assets.
Hardy
Acquisition -
On
March
27, 2003, the Company acquired control of BRL Hardy Limited, now known as Hardy
Wine Company Limited (“Hardy”),
and on April 9, 2003, the Company completed its acquisition of all of Hardy’s
outstanding capital stock. As a result of the acquisition of Hardy, the Company
also acquired the remaining 50% ownership of Pacific Wine Partners LLC (“PWP”),
the joint venture the Company established with Hardy in July 2001. The
acquisition of Hardy along with the remaining interest in PWP is referred to
together as the “Hardy Acquisition.” Through this acquisition, the Company
acquired one of Australia’s largest wine producers with interests in wineries
and vineyards in most of Australia’s major wine regions as well as New Zealand
and the United States and Hardy’s marketing and sales operations in the United
Kingdom. In October 2005, PWP was merged into another subsidiary of the
Company.
Total
consideration paid in cash and Class A Common Stock to the Hardy shareholders
was $1,137.4 million. Additionally, the Company recorded direct acquisition
costs of $17.2 million. The acquisition date for accounting purposes is March
27, 2003. The Company has recorded a $1.6 million reduction in the purchase
price to reflect imputed interest between the accounting acquisition date and
the final payment of consideration. This charge is included as interest expense
in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended February 29, 2004.
The cash portion of the purchase price paid to the Hardy shareholders and
optionholders ($1,060.2 million) was financed with $660.2 million of borrowings
under the Company’s then existing credit agreement and $400.0 million of
borrowings under the Company’s then existing bridge loan agreement.
Additionally, the Company issued 6,577,826 shares of the Company’s Class A
Common Stock, which were valued at $77.2 million based on the simple average
of
the closing market price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock beginning two
days before and ending two days after April 4, 2003, the day the Hardy
shareholders elected the form of consideration they wished to receive. The
purchase price was based primarily on a discounted cash flow analysis that
contemplated, among other things, the value of a broader geographic distribution
in strategic international markets and a presence in the important Australian
winemaking regions. The Company and Hardy have complementary businesses that
share a common growth orientation and operating philosophy. The Hardy
Acquisition supports the Company’s strategy of growth and breadth across
categories and geographies, and strengthens its competitive position in its
core
markets. The purchase price and resulting goodwill were primarily based on
the
growth opportunities of the brand portfolio of Hardy. In particular, the Company
believes there are growth opportunities for Australian wines in the United
Kingdom, United States and other wine markets. This acquisition supports the
Company’s strategy of driving long-term growth and positions the Company to
capitalize on the growth opportunities in “new world” wine markets.
The
results of operations of Hardy and PWP are reported in the Constellation Wines
segment and have been included in the Consolidated Statements of Income since
the accounting acquisition date.
70
The
following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in the Hardy Acquisition at the date of acquisition, as
adjusted for the final appraisal:
(in
thousands)
|
||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
557,128
|
||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
332,125
|
|||
Other
assets
|
30,135
|
|||
Trademarks
|
263,120
|
|||
Goodwill
|
613,608
|
|||
Total
assets acquired
|
1,796,116
|
|||
Current
liabilities
|
311,138
|
|||
Long-term
liabilities
|
331,954
|
|||
Total
liabilities assumed
|
643,092
|
|||
Net
assets acquired
|
$
|
1,153,024
|
The
trademarks are not subject to amortization. None of the goodwill is expected
to
be deductible for tax purposes.
The
following table sets forth the unaudited pro forma results
of operations of the Company for the years ended February 28, 2005, and February
29, 2004, respectively. The unaudited pro forma results of operations for the
years ended February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004, give effect to the Robert
Mondavi acquisition as if it occurred on March 1, 2003. The unaudited pro forma
results of operations for the year ended February 29, 2004, do not give effect
to the Hardy Acquisition as if it occurred on March 1, 2003, as it is not
significant. The unaudited pro forma results of operations are presented after
giving effect to certain adjustments for depreciation, amortization of deferred
financing costs, interest expense on the acquisition financing, interest expense
associated with adverse grape contracts, and related income tax effects. The
unaudited pro forma results of operations are based upon currently available
information and certain assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable
under the circumstances. The unaudited pro forma results of operations for
the
year ended February 29, 2004, do not reflect total pretax nonrecurring charges
of $21.9 million ($0.07 per share on a diluted basis) related to transaction
costs, primarily for the acceleration of vesting of stock options, legal fees
and investment banker fees, all of which were incurred by Robert Mondavi prior
to the acquisition. The unaudited pro forma results of operations do not purport
to present what the Company’s results of operations would actually have been if
the aforementioned transactions had in fact occurred on such date or at the
beginning of the period indicated, nor do they project the Company’s financial
position or results of operations at any future date or for any future
period.
For
the Years Ended
|
|||||||
February
28,
2005
|
February
29,
2004
|
||||||
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
|||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
4,479,603
|
$
|
4,017,436
|
|||
Income
before income taxes
|
$
|
383,035
|
$
|
384,330
|
|||
Net
income
|
$
|
243,437
|
$
|
245,812
|
|||
Income
available to common stockholders
|
$
|
233,633
|
$
|
240,066
|
|||
Earnings
per common share - basic:
|
|||||||
Class
A Common Stock
|
$
|
1.10
|
$
|
1.21
|
|||
Class
B Common Stock
|
$
|
1.00
|
$
|
1.10
|
|||
Earnings
per common share - diluted
|
$
|
1.04
|
$
|
1.15
|
|||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - basic:
|
|||||||
Class
A Common Stock
|
191,489
|
177,267
|
|||||
Class
B Common Stock
|
24,043
|
24,137
|
|||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - diluted
|
233,060
|
213,897
|
71
During
the year
ended February 28, 2006, the Company completed its acquisition of two
businesses, Rex Goliath and Cocktails by Jenn, for a total combined purchased
price of $48.2 million. Unaudited pro forma results of operations for the years
ended February
28,
2006, and February 28, 2005, to give pro forma effect to these acquisitions
as
if they occurred on March 1, 2004, are not shown as they are not
significant.
4. PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
The
major
components of property, plant and equipment are as follows:
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Land
and land improvements
|
$
|
245,237
|
$
|
308,119
|
|||
Vineyards
|
187,651
|
236,827
|
|||||
Buildings
and improvements
|
373,160
|
367,544
|
|||||
Machinery
and equipment
|
1,042,207
|
1,029,297
|
|||||
Motor
vehicles
|
16,226
|
19,351
|
|||||
Construction
in progress
|
73,876
|
63,776
|
|||||
1,938,357
|
2,024,914
|
||||||
Less
- Accumulated depreciation
|
(513,059
|
)
|
(428,547
|
)
|
|||
$
|
1,425,298
|
$
|
1,596,367
|
5. GOODWILL:
The
changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended February 28,
2006,
are as follows:
Constellation
Wines
|
Constellation
Beers
and
Spirits
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||
Balance,
February 28, 2005
|
$
|
2,031,244
|
$
|
151,425
|
$
|
2,182,669
|
||||
Purchase
accounting allocations
|
74,216
|
6,008
|
80,224
|
|||||||
Foreign
currency translation
adjustments
|
(73,429
|
)
|
1,210
|
(72,219
|
)
|
|||||
Purchase
price earn-out
|
2,888
|
21
|
2,909
|
|||||||
Balance,
February 28, 2006
|
$
|
2,034,919
|
$
|
158,664
|
$
|
2,193,583
|
The
purchase accounting allocations of goodwill totaling $80.2 million consist
primarily of final purchase accounting allocations associated with the Robert
Mondavi acquisition and goodwill resulting from the acquisition of two
businesses, Rex Goliath and Cocktails by Jenn. In addition, the purchase price
for Cocktails by Jenn includes an earn-out for a peirod of up to ten years
based
on the performance of the brands. The results of operations of Rex Goliath
are
reported in the Constellation Wines segment and the results of operations of
Cocktails by Jenn are reported in the Constellation Beers and Spirits segment,
and have been included in the Consolidated Statements of Income since their
respective acquisition dates.
72
6. INTANGIBLE
ASSETS:
The
major
components of intangible assets are:
February
28, 2006
|
February
28, 2005
|
||||||||||||
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
Net
Carrying
Amount
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
Net
Carrying
Amount
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
Amortizable
intangible assets:
|
|||||||||||||
Distributor
relationships
|
$
|
3,700
|
$
|
3,556
|
$
|
3,700
|
$
|
3,679
|
|||||
Distribution
agreements
|
18,882
|
7,006
|
12,884
|
1,666
|
|||||||||
Other
|
2,387
|
1,338
|
5,230
|
1,229
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
24,969
|
11,900
|
$
|
21,814
|
6,574
|
|||||||
Nonamortizable
intangible assets:
|
|||||||||||||
Trademarks
|
853,568
|
920,664
|
|||||||||||
Agency
relationships
|
18,412
|
18,412
|
|||||||||||
Total
|
871,980
|
939,076
|
|||||||||||
Total
intangible assets
|
$
|
883,880
|
$
|
945,650
|
The
difference between the gross carrying amount and net carrying amount for
each
item presented is attributable to accumulated amortization. Amortization
expense
for intangible assets was $1.9 million, $2.8 million, and $2.6 million for
the
years ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004,
respectively. Estimated amortization expense for each of the five succeeding
fiscal years and thereafter is as follows:
(in
thousands)
|
||||
2007
|
$
|
1,498
|
||
2008
|
$
|
1,177
|
||
2009
|
$
|
1,165
|
||
2010
|
$
|
1,143
|
||
2011
|
$
|
869
|
||
Thereafter
|
$
|
6,048
|
7. OTHER
ASSETS:
The
major
components of other assets are as follows:
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Investment
in equity method investees
|
$
|
146,639
|
$
|
259,181
|
|||
Deferred
financing costs
|
34,827
|
34,827
|
|||||
Deferred
tax asset
|
15,824
|
21,808
|
|||||
Derivative
assets
|
3,714
|
23,147
|
|||||
Other
|
11,557
|
15,880
|
|||||
212,561
|
354,843
|
||||||
Less
- Accumulated amortization
|
(15,623
|
)
|
(9,392
|
)
|
|||
$
|
196,938
|
$
|
345,451
|
In
connection with the Hardy Acquisition and the Robert Mondavi acquisition,
the
Company acquired several investments which are being accounted for under
the
equity method. The primary investment consists of Opus One, a 50% owned joint
venture arrangement (see Note 3). The percentage of ownership of the remaining
investments ranges from 20% to 50%.
73
In
addition, on December 3, 2004, the Company purchased a 40% interest in Ruffino
S.r.l. (“Ruffino”), the well-known Italian fine wine company, for $89.6 million,
including direct acquisition costs of $7.5 million. The Company does not
have a
controlling interest in Ruffino or exert any managerial control. The
Company accounts for the investment under the equity method; accordingly,
the
results of operations of Ruffino from December 3, 2004, are included in the
equity in earnings of equity method investees line in the Company’s Consolidated
Statements of Income.
As
of
February 1, 2005, the Company’s Constellation Wines segment began distribution
of Ruffino’s products in the U.S. In connection with this arrangement, for the
year ended February 28, 2006, the Company purchased from Ruffino $41.7 million
of inventory with normal terms and conditions. Amounts purchased for the
year
ended February 28, 2005, were not material. As of February 28, 2006, amounts
payable to Ruffino were not material.
During
the year ended February 28, 2005, the Company sold its available-for-sale
marketable equity security for cash proceeds of $14.4 million resulting in
a
gross realized loss of $0.7 million.
Amortization
expense for other assets was included in selling, general and administrative
expenses and was $6.2 million, $7.7 million, and $19.3 million for the years
ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004, respectively.
Amortization expense for the year ended February 29, 2004, included $7.9
million
related to amortization of the deferred financing costs associated with the
Company’s then existing bridge loan agreement. As of February 29, 2004, the
deferred financing costs associated with the Company’s then existing bridge loan
agreement were fully amortized.
8. OTHER
ACCRUED EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES:
The
major
components of other accrued expenses and liabilities are as
follows:
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Advertising
and promotions
|
$
|
174,119
|
$
|
193,353
|
|||
Income
taxes payable
|
113,210
|
59,754
|
|||||
Salaries
and commissions
|
77,329
|
63,367
|
|||||
Adverse
grape contracts (Note 14)
|
59,049
|
66,737
|
|||||
Other
|
190,905
|
250,697
|
|||||
$
|
614,612
|
$
|
633,908
|
74
9. BORROWINGS:
Borrowings
consist of the following:
February
28, 2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||||||||||||
Current
|
Long-term
|
Total
|
Total
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
Notes
Payable to Banks:
|
|||||||||||||
Senior
Credit Facility -
|
|||||||||||||
Revolving
Credit Loans
|
$
|
54,500
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
54,500
|
$
|
14,000
|
|||||
Other
|
25,381
|
-
|
25,381
|
2,475
|
|||||||||
$
|
79,881
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
79,881
|
$
|
16,475
|
||||||
Long-term
Debt:
|
|||||||||||||
Senior
Credit Facility - Term Loans
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,764,000
|
$
|
1,764,000
|
$
|
2,280,500
|
|||||
Senior
Notes
|
200,000
|
471,466
|
671,466
|
697,297
|
|||||||||
Senior
Subordinated Notes
|
-
|
250,000
|
250,000
|
250,000
|
|||||||||
Other
Long-term Debt
|
14,066
|
30,314
|
44,380
|
45,004
|
|||||||||
$
|
214,066
|
$
|
2,515,780
|
$
|
2,729,846
|
$
|
3,272,801
|
Senior
credit facility -
In
connection with the acquisition of Robert Mondavi, on December 22, 2004,
the
Company and its U.S. subsidiaries (excluding certain inactive subsidiaries),
together with certain of its subsidiaries organized in foreign jurisdictions,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as a lender and administrative agent, and certain
other agents, lenders, and financial institutions entered into a new credit
agreement (the “2004 Credit Agreement”). The 2004 Credit Agreement provides for
aggregate credit facilities of $2.9 billion (subject to increase as therein
provided to $3.2 billion), consisting of a $600.0 million tranche A term
loan
facility due in November 2010, a $1.8 billion tranche B term loan facility
due
in November 2011, and a $500.0 million revolving credit facility (including
a
sub-facility for letters of credit of up to $60.0 million) which terminates
in
December 2010. Proceeds of the 2004 Credit Agreement were used to pay off
the
Company’s obligations under its prior senior credit facility, to fund the cash
consideration payable in connection with its acquisition of Robert Mondavi,
and
to pay certain obligations of Robert Mondavi, including indebtedness outstanding
under its bank facility and unsecured notes of $355.4 million. The Company
uses
its revolving credit facility under the 2004 Credit Agreement for general
corporate purposes, including working capital, on an as needed basis. In
connection with entering into the 2004 Credit Agreement, the Company recorded
a
charge during the year ended February 28, 2005, of $21.4 million in selling,
general and administrative expenses for the write-off of bank fees related
to
the repayment of the Company’s prior senior credit facility.
The
tranche A term loan facility and the tranche B term loan facility were fully
drawn on December 22, 2004. As of February 28, 2006, the required principal
repayments of the tranche A term loan and the tranche B term loan for each
of
the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter are as follows:
Tranche
A
Term
Loan
|
Tranche
B
Term
Loan
|
Total
|
||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||
2007
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
2008
|
45,182
|
-
|
45,182
|
|||||||
2009
|
103,273
|
14,563
|
117,836
|
|||||||
2010
|
109,727
|
14,563
|
124,290
|
|||||||
2011
|
96,818
|
353,160
|
449,978
|
|||||||
Thereafter
|
-
|
1,026,714
|
1,026,714
|
|||||||
$
|
355,000
|
$
|
1,409,000
|
$
|
1,764,000
|
75
The
rate
of interest on borrowings under the 2004 Credit Agreement, at the Company’s
option, is a function of LIBOR plus a margin, the federal funds rate plus
a
margin, or the prime rate plus a margin. The margin is adjustable based upon
the
Company’s debt ratio (as defined in the 2004 Credit Agreement) and, with respect
to LIBOR borrowings, ranges between 1.00% and 1.75%. As of February 28, 2006,
the LIBOR margin for the revolving credit facility and the tranche A term
loan
facility is 1.25%, while the LIBOR margin on the tranche B term loan facility
is
1.50%.
The
Company’s obligations are guaranteed by its U.S. subsidiaries (excluding certain
inactive subsidiaries) and by certain of its foreign subsidiaries. These
obligations are also secured by a pledge of (i) 100% of the ownership interests
in most of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries and (ii) 65% of the voting capital
stock of certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries.
The
Company and its subsidiaries are also subject to customary lending covenants
including those restricting additional liens, the incurrence of additional
indebtedness (including guarantees of indebtedness), the sale of assets,
the
payment of dividends, transactions with affiliates, the disposition and
acquisition of property and the making of certain investments, in each case
subject to numerous baskets, exceptions and thresholds. The financial covenants
are limited to maximum total debt and senior debt coverage ratios and minimum
fixed charges and interest coverage ratios. As of February 28, 2006, the
Company
is in compliance with all of its covenants under its 2004 Credit
Agreement.
As
of
February 28, 2006, under the 2004 Credit Agreement, the Company had outstanding
tranche A term loans of $355.0 million bearing a weighted average interest
rate
of 5.8%, tranche B term loans of $1,409.0 million bearing a weighted average
interest rate of 5.9%, revolving loans of $54.5 million bearing a weighted
average interest rate of 5.7%, undrawn revolving letters of credit of $35.1
million, and $410.4 million in revolving loans available to be
drawn.
In
March
2005, the Company replaced its then outstanding five year interest rate swap
agreements with new five year delayed start interest rate swap agreements
effective March 1, 2006, which are outstanding as of February 28, 2006. These
delayed start interest rate swap agreements extended the original hedged
period
through fiscal 2010. The swap agreements fixed LIBOR interest rates on $1,200.0
million of the Company’s floating LIBOR rate debt at an average rate of 4.1%
over the five year term. The Company received $30.3 million in proceeds from
the
unwinding of the original swaps. This amount will be reclassified from
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”) ratably into earnings in the
same period in which the original hedged item is recorded in the Consolidated
Statements of Income. For the year ended February 28, 2006, the Company
reclassified $3.6 million from AOCI to Interest Expense, net in the Company’s
Consolidated Statements of Income. This non-cash operating activity is included
in the Other, net line in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows.
Foreign
subsidiary facilities -
The
Company has additional credit arrangements available totaling $188.9 million
as
of February 28, 2006. These arrangements support the financing needs of certain
of the Company’s foreign subsidiary operations. Interest rates and other terms
of these borrowings vary from country to country, depending on local market
conditions. As of February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005, amounts outstanding
under the subsidiary credit arrangements were $52.3 million and $34.0 million,
respectively.
Senior
notes
-
On
August
4, 1999, the Company issued $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of
8 5/8%
Senior Notes due August 2006 (the “August 1999 Senior Notes”). Interest on the
August 1999 Senior Notes is payable semiannually on February 1 and August
1. As
of February 28, 2006, the Company had outstanding $200.0 million aggregate
principal amount of August 1999 Senior Notes.
76
On
November 17, 1999, the Company issued £75.0 million ($121.7 million upon
issuance) aggregate principal amount of 8 1/2% Senior Notes due November
2009
(the “Sterling Senior Notes”). Interest on the Sterling Senior Notes is payable
semiannually on May 15 and November 15. In March 2000, the Company exchanged
£75.0 million aggregate principal amount of 8 1/2% Series B Senior Notes due
in
November 2009 (the “Sterling Series B Senior Notes”) for all of the Sterling
Senior Notes. The terms of the Sterling Series B Senior Notes are identical
in
all material respects to the Sterling Senior Notes. In
October 2000, the Company exchanged £74.0 million aggregate principal amount of
Sterling Series C Senior Notes (as defined below) for £74.0 million of the
Sterling Series B Notes. The terms of the Sterling Series C Senior Notes
are
identical in all material respects to the Sterling Series B Senior Notes.
As of
February 28, 2006, the Company had outstanding £1.0
million ($1.8
million)
aggregate
principal amount of Sterling Series B Senior Notes.
On
May
15, 2000, the Company issued £80.0 million ($120.0 million upon issuance)
aggregate principal amount of 8 1/2% Series C Senior Notes due November 2009
at
an issuance price of £79.6 million ($119.4 million upon issuance, net of $0.6
million unamortized discount, with an effective interest rate of 8.6%) (the
“Sterling Series C Senior Notes”). Interest on the Sterling Series C Senior
Notes is payable semiannually on May 15 and November 15. As of February 28,
2006, the Company had outstanding £154.0 million ($269.7 million, net of $0.3
million unamortized discount) aggregate principal amount of Sterling Series
C
Senior Notes.
On
February 21, 2001, the Company issued $200.0 million aggregate principal
amount
of 8% Senior Notes due February 2008 (the “February 2001 Senior Notes”).
Interest on the February 2001 Senior Notes is payable semiannually on February
15 and August 15. In
July
2001, the Company exchanged $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of
8%
Series B Senior Notes due February 2008 (the “February 2001 Series B Senior
Notes”) for all of the February 2001 Senior Notes. The terms of the February
2001 Series B Senior Notes are identical in all material respects to the
February 2001 Senior Notes. As of February 28, 2006, the Company had outstanding
$200.0 million aggregate principal amount of February 2001 Series B Senior
Notes.
The
senior notes described above are redeemable, in whole or in part, at the
option
of the Company at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% of the
outstanding principal amount and a make whole payment based on the present
value
of the future payments at the adjusted Treasury rate or adjusted Gilt rate
plus
50 basis points. The senior notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank
equally in right of payment to all existing and future unsecured senior
indebtedness of the Company. Certain of the Company’s significant operating
subsidiaries guarantee the senior notes, on a senior basis.
Senior
subordinated notes
-
On
March
4, 1999, the Company issued $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of
8 1/2%
Senior Subordinated Notes due March 2009 (“Senior Subordinated Notes”). On March
11, 2004, the Senior Subordinated Notes were redeemed with proceeds from
the
revolving credit facility under the Company’s then existing senior credit
facility at 104.25% of par plus accrued interest. During the year ended February
28, 2005, in connection with this redemption, the Company recorded a charge
of
$10.3 million in selling, general and administrative expenses for the call
premium and the remaining unamortized financing fees associated with the
original issuance of the Senior Subordinated Notes.
77
On
January 23, 2002, the Company issued $250.0 million aggregate principal amount
of 8 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due January 2012 (“January 2002 Senior
Subordinated Notes”). Interest on the January 2002 Senior Subordinated Notes is
payable semiannually on January 15 and July 15. The January 2002 Senior
Subordinated Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company, in whole
or in
part, at any time on or after January 15, 2007. The January 2002 Senior
Subordinated Notes are unsecured and subordinated to the prior payment in
full
of all senior indebtedness of the Company, which includes the senior credit
facility. The January 2002 Senior Subordinated Notes are guaranteed, on a
senior
subordinated basis, by certain of the Company’s significant operating
subsidiaries. As of February 28, 2006, the Company had outstanding $250.0
million aggregate principal amount of January 2002 Senior Subordinated
Notes.
Trust
Indentures
-
The
Company’s various Trust Indentures relating to the senior notes and senior
subordinated notes contain certain covenants, including, but not limited
to: (i)
limitation on indebtedness; (ii) limitation on restricted payments; (iii)
limitation on transactions with affiliates; (iv) limitation on senior
subordinated indebtedness; (v) limitation on liens; (vi) limitation on sale
of
assets; (vii) limitation on issuance of guarantees of and pledges for
indebtedness; (viii) restriction on transfer of assets; (ix) limitation on
subsidiary capital stock; (x) limitation on dividends and other payment
restrictions affecting subsidiaries; and (xi) restrictions on mergers,
consolidations and the transfer of all or substantially all of the assets
of the
Company to another person. The limitation on indebtedness covenant is governed
by a rolling four quarter fixed charge ratio requiring a specified
minimum.
Debt
payments
-
Principal
payments required under long-term debt obligations (excluding unamortized
discount of $0.3
million)
during the next five fiscal years and thereafter are as follows:
(in
thousands)
|
||||
2007
|
$
|
214,066
|
||
2008
|
253,506
|
|||
2009
|
124,728
|
|||
2010
|
405,030
|
|||
2011
|
451,055
|
|||
Thereafter
|
1,281,803
|
|||
$
|
2,730,188
|
10. INCOME
TAXES:
Income
before income taxes was generated as follows:
For
the Years Ended
|
||||||||||
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
February
29,
2004
|
||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||
Domestic
|
$
|
446,760
|
$
|
357,444
|
$
|
289,960
|
||||
Foreign
|
30,498
|
74,530
|
54,437
|
|||||||
$
|
477,258
|
$
|
431,974
|
$
|
344,397
|
78
The
income tax provision consisted of the following:
For
the Years Ended
|
||||||||||
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
February
29,
2004
|
||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||
Current:
|
||||||||||
Federal
|
$
|
95,060
|
$
|
70,280
|
$
|
68,125
|
||||
State
|
18,918
|
15,041
|
13,698
|
|||||||
Foreign
|
7,902
|
21,915
|
14,116
|
|||||||
Total
current
|
121,880
|
107,236
|
95,939
|
|||||||
Deferred:
|
||||||||||
Federal
|
26,995
|
52,030
|
18,843
|
|||||||
State
|
5,133
|
4,507
|
6,180
|
|||||||
Foreign
|
(2,012
|
)
|
(8,263
|
)
|
3,021
|
|||||
Total
deferred
|
30,116
|
48,274
|
28,044
|
|||||||
Income
tax provision
|
$
|
151,996
|
$
|
155,510
|
$
|
123,983
|
The
foreign provision for income taxes is based on foreign pretax earnings. Earnings
of foreign subsidiaries would be subject to U.S. income taxation on repatriation
to the U.S. The Company’s consolidated financial statements provide for
anticipated tax liabilities on amounts that may be repatriated.
Deferred
tax assets and liabilities reflect the future income tax effects of temporary
differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts
of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and are measured
using enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income.
Significant
components of deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the
following:
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|||||||
Employee
benefits
|
$
|
44,225
|
$
|
32,988
|
|||
Inventory
|
42,951
|
89,339
|
|||||
Net
operating losses
|
34,095
|
37,846
|
|||||
Foreign
tax credit
|
7,241
|
13,397
|
|||||
Insurance
accruals
|
6,348
|
5,190
|
|||||
Unrealized
foreign exchange
|
-
|
21,006
|
|||||
Other
accruals
|
34,343
|
20,628
|
|||||
Gross
deferred tax assets
|
169,203
|
220,394
|
|||||
Valuation
allowances
|
(3,497
|
)
|
(4,628
|
)
|
|||
Deferred
tax assets, net
|
165,706
|
215,766
|
|||||
Deferred
tax liabilities:
|
|||||||
Intangible
assets
|
(238,876
|
)
|
(240,766
|
)
|
|||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
(157,717
|
)
|
(165,625
|
)
|
|||
Investment
in equity method investees
|
(24,444
|
)
|
(53,760
|
)
|
|||
Unrealized
foreign exchange
|
(5,890
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Derivative
instruments
|
(4,937
|
)
|
(27,250
|
)
|
|||
Provision
for unremitted earnings
|
(981
|
)
|
(4,892
|
)
|
|||
Total
deferred tax liabilities
|
(432,845
|
)
|
(492,293
|
)
|
|||
Deferred
tax liabilities, net
|
(267,139
|
)
|
(276,527
|
)
|
|||
Less: Current
deferred tax assets
|
88,345
|
98,744
|
|||||
Long-term deferred assets
|
15,824
|
21,808
|
|||||
Current deferred tax liability
|
(62
|
)
|
(7,193
|
)
|
|||
Long-term
deferred tax liabilities, net
|
$
|
(371,246
|
)
|
$
|
(389,886
|
)
|
79
In
assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers
whether
it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will
not
be realized. Management considers the reversal of deferred tax liabilities
and
projected future taxable income in making this assessment. Based upon this
assessment, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company
will
realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net of any valuation
allowances.
Operating
loss carryforwards totaling $112.3 million at February 28, 2006, are being
carried forward in a number of U.S. and foreign jurisdictions where the Company
is permitted to use tax operating losses from prior periods to reduce future
taxable income. Of these operating loss carryforwards, $2.3 million will
expire
in 2024 and $110.0 million of
operating losses in foreign jurisdictions
may be
carried forward indefinitely. In addition, certain tax credits generated
of $7.2
million are available to offset future income taxes. These credits will expire,
if not utilized, in 2014 through 2015.
On
October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act (“AJCA”) was signed into law.
The AJCA includes a special one-time 85% dividends received deduction for
certain foreign earnings that are repatriated. For the year ended February
28,
2006, the Company repatriated $95.7 million of earnings under the provisions
of
the AJCA. Deferred taxes had previously been provided for a portion of the
dividends remitted. The reversal of deferred taxes offset the tax costs to
repatriate the earnings and the Company recorded a net benefit of $6.8 million.
The
AJCA
also provides relief to U.S. domestic manufacturers by providing a tax deduction
related to “qualified production income,” which will be phased in over five
years. In accordance with FASB Staff Position No. FAS 109-1 (“FSP FAS 109-1”),
“Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, for the
Tax
Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004,” the Company will recognize these benefits in the period
in which the deduction is claimed. The tax benefit for the year ended February
28, 2006, was $2.0 million.
The
Company is subject to ongoing tax examinations and assessments in various
jurisdictions. Accordingly, the Company provides for additional tax expense
based on probable outcomes of such matters. While it is often difficult to
predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular tax
matter, the Company believes the reserves reflect the probable outcome of
known
tax contingencies. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue would require
use of cash. Favorable resolution would be recognized as a reduction to the
effective tax rate in the year of resolution. During the year ended February
28,
2006, various federal, state, and international examinations were finalized.
A
tax benefit of $16.2 million was recorded primarily related to the resolution
of
certain tax positions in connection with those examinations.
80
A
reconciliation of the total tax provision to the amount computed by applying
the
statutory U.S. Federal income tax rate to income before provision for income
taxes is as follows:
For
the Years Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
February
29,
2004
|
|||||||||||||||||
%
of
|
%
of
|
%
of
|
|||||||||||||||||
Pretax
|
Pretax
|
Pretax
|
|||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
Income
|
Amount
|
Income
|
Amount
|
Income
|
||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Income
tax provision at statutory rate
|
$
|
167,040
|
35.0
|
$
|
151,191
|
35.0
|
$
|
120,521
|
35.0
|
||||||||||
State
and local income taxes, net of
federal
income tax benefit
|
15,634
|
3.3
|
12,706
|
2.9
|
13,032
|
3.8
|
|||||||||||||
Earnings
of subsidiaries taxed at
other
than U.S. statutory rate
|
(20,691
|
)
|
(4.3
|
)
|
(5,024
|
)
|
(1.1
|
)
|
(12,170
|
)
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|||||||
Resolution
of certain tax positions
|
(16,208
|
)
|
(3.4
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Miscellaneous
items, net
|
6,221
|
1.2
|
(3,363
|
)
|
(0.8
|
)
|
2,600
|
0.7
|
|||||||||||
$
|
151,996
|
31.8
|
$
|
155,510
|
36.0
|
$
|
123,983
|
36.0
|
The
effect of earnings of foreign subsidiaries includes the difference between
the
U.S. statutory rate and local jurisdiction tax rates, as well as the
(benefit)
provision for incremental U.S. taxes on unremitted earnings of foreign
subsidiaries offset by foreign tax credits and other foreign
adjustments.
11. OTHER
LIABILITIES:
The
major
components of other liabilities are as follows:
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Adverse
grape contracts (Note 14)
|
$
|
64,569
|
$
|
145,958
|
|||
Accrued
pension liability
|
122,141
|
85,584
|
|||||
Other
|
53,587
|
60,037
|
|||||
$
|
240,297
|
$
|
291,579
|
12. PROFIT
SHARING AND RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLANS:
The
Company’s retirement and profit sharing plan, the Constellation Brands, Inc.
401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan (the “Plan”), covers substantially all U.S.
employees, excluding those employees covered by collective bargaining
agreements. The 401(k) portion of the Plan permits eligible employees to
defer a
portion of their compensation (as defined in the Plan) on a pretax basis.
Participants may defer up to 50% of their compensation for the year, subject
to
limitations of the Plan. The Company makes a matching contribution of 50%
of the
first 6% of compensation a participant defers. The amount of the Company’s
contribution under the profit sharing portion of the Plan is a discretionary
amount as determined by the Board of Directors
on an annual basis, subject to limitations of the Plan. Company contributions
under the Plan were $15.9 million, $13.0 million, and $11.6 million for the
years ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February
29,
2004, respectively.
81
During
the year ended February 29, 2004, in connection with the Hardy Acquisition,
the
Company acquired the BRL Hardy Superannuation Fund (now known as the Hardy
Wine
Company Superannuation Plan) (the “Hardy Plan”) which covers substantially all
salaried Australian employees. The Hardy Plan has a defined benefit component
and a defined contribution component. The Company also has a statutory
obligation to provide a minimum defined contribution on behalf of any Australian
employees who are not covered by the Hardy Plan. In addition, during the
year
ended February 29, 2004, the Company instituted a defined contribution plan
that
covers substantially all of its U.K. employees. Lastly, the Company has a
defined contribution plan that covers certain of its Canadian employees.
Company
contributions under the defined contribution component of the Hardy Plan,
the
Australian statutory obligation, the U.K. defined contribution plan and the
Canadian defined contribution plan aggregated $8.2
million, $7.0 million,
and
$7.2
million for the
years
ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004,
respectively.
The
Company also has defined benefit pension plans
that
cover certain of its non-U.S. employees. These consist of a Canadian plan,
an
U.K. plan and the defined benefit component of the Hardy Plan. For the year
ended February 28, 2006, the Company’s net periodic benefit cost includes $6.4
million of recognized net actuarial loss due to an adjustment in the Company’s
U.K. plan. Of this amount, $2.7 million represents current year expense.
During
the year ended February 28, 2005, an amendment to the Canadian plan modifying
pension benefits increased the pension benefit obligation by $0.9 million.
During
the year ended February 29, 2004, the Company ceased future accruals for
active
employees under its U.K. plan. There were no curtailment charges arising
from
this event. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for all of its
plans. Net periodic benefit cost reported in the Consolidated Statements
of
Income for these plans includes the following components:
For
the Years Ended
|
||||||||||
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
February
29,
2004
|
||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
2,149
|
$
|
2,117
|
$
|
2,202
|
||||
Interest
cost
|
17,260
|
16,391
|
14,471
|
|||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(16,458
|
)
|
(17,250
|
)
|
(15,155
|
)
|
||||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
199
|
9
|
9
|
|||||||
Recognized
net actuarial loss
|
9,360
|
2,530
|
2,019
|
|||||||
Net
periodic benefit cost
|
$
|
12,510
|
$
|
3,797
|
$
|
3,546
|
The
following table summarizes the funded status of the Company’s defined benefit
pension plans and the related amounts included in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets:
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Change
in benefit obligation:
|
|||||||
Benefit
obligation as of March 1
|
$
|
349,090
|
$
|
301,608
|
|||
Service
cost
|
2,149
|
2,117
|
|||||
Interest
cost
|
17,260
|
16,391
|
|||||
Plan
participants’ contributions
|
166
|
84
|
|||||
Actuarial
loss
|
62,194
|
29,939
|
|||||
Plan
amendment
|
38
|
884
|
|||||
Benefits
paid
|
(11,893
|
)
|
(12,769
|
)
|
|||
Foreign
currency exchange rate changes
|
(25,837
|
)
|
10,836
|
||||
Benefit
obligation as of the last day of February
|
$
|
393,167
|
$
|
349,090
|
82
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Change
in plan assets:
|
|||||||
Fair
value of plan assets as of March 1
|
$
|
253,657
|
$
|
236,314
|
|||
Actual
return on plan assets
|
30,411
|
19,092
|
|||||
Plan
participants’ contributions
|
166
|
84
|
|||||
Employer
contribution
|
5,602
|
3,186
|
|||||
Benefits
paid
|
(11,893
|
)
|
(12,769
|
)
|
|||
Foreign
currency exchange rate changes
|
(18,506
|
)
|
7,750
|
||||
Fair
value of plan assets as of the last day of February
|
$
|
259,437
|
$
|
253,657
|
|||
Funded
status of the plan as of the last day of February:
|
|||||||
Funded
status
|
$
|
(133,730
|
)
|
$
|
(95,433
|
)
|
|
Employer
contributions from measurement date
to
fiscal year end
|
768
|
759
|
|||||
Unrecognized
prior service cost
|
836
|
927
|
|||||
Unrecognized
actuarial loss
|
152,420
|
123,277
|
|||||
Net
amount recognized
|
$
|
20,294
|
$
|
29,530
|
|||
Amounts
recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist
of:
|
|||||||
Prepaid
benefit cost
|
$
|
827
|
$
|
555
|
|||
Accrued
benefit liability
|
(122,141
|
)
|
(85,584
|
)
|
|||
Intangible
asset
|
836
|
927
|
|||||
Deferred
tax asset
|
42,458
|
34,210
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
98,314
|
79,422
|
|||||
Net
amount recognized
|
$
|
20,294
|
$
|
29,530
|
As
of
February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005, the accumulated benefit obligation
for
all defined benefit pension plans was $379.7 million and $337.9 million,
respectively. The following table summarizes the projected benefit obligation,
accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for those pension
plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan
assets:
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Projected
benefit obligation
|
$
|
376,467
|
$
|
332,952
|
|||
Accumulated
benefit obligation
|
$
|
363,015
|
$
|
321,963
|
|||
Fair
value of plan assets
|
$
|
240,313
|
$
|
236,145
|
The
increase in minimum pension liability included in AOCI for the years ended
February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005, was $18.9 million and
$21.2
million, respectively.
The
following table sets forth the weighted average assumptions used in developing
the net periodic pension expense:
For
the Years Ended
|
|||||||
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||||||
Rate
of return on plan assets
|
7.09%
|
|
7.50%
|
|
|||
Discount
rate
|
5.42%
|
|
5.79%
|
|
|||
Rate
of compensation increase
|
3.77%
|
|
3.94%
|
|
83
The
following table sets forth the weighted average assumptions used in developing
the benefit obligation:
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||
Discount
rate
|
4.72%
|
5.41%
|
|
Rate
of compensation increase
|
3.95%
|
3.76%
|
The
Company’s weighted average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is
7.09%. The Company considers the historical level of long-term returns and
the
current level of expected long-term returns for each asset class, as well
as the
current and expected allocation of assets when developing its expected long-term
rate of return on assets assumption. The expected return for each asset class
is
weighted based on the target asset allocation to develop the expected long-term
rate of return on assets assumption for the Company’s portfolios.
The
following table sets forth the weighted average asset allocations by asset
category:
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||
Asset
Category:
|
|||
Equity
securities
|
35.7%
|
33.1%
|
|
Debt
securities
|
33.4%
|
38.0%
|
|
Real
estate
|
0.5%
|
0.5%
|
|
Other
|
30.4%
|
28.4%
|
|
Total
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
For
each
of its Canadian, U.K. and Australian defined benefit plans, the Company employs
an investment return approach whereby a mix of equities and fixed income
investments are used (on a plan by plan basis) to maximize the long-term
rate of
return on plan assets for a prudent level of risk. From time to time, the
Company will target asset allocation on a plan by plan basis to enhance total
return while balancing risks. The established weighted average target
allocations across all of the Company’s plans are approximately 37% equity
securities, 20% fixed income securities, 4% real estate and 39% other. The
other
component results primarily from investments held by the Company’s U.K. plan and
consists primarily of U.K. hedge funds which have characteristics of both
equity
and fixed income securities. Risk tolerance is established
separately
for each
plan through careful consideration of plan liabilities, plan funded status,
and
corporate financial condition. The individual investment portfolios contain
a
diversified blend of equity and fixed-income investments. Equity investments
are
diversified across each plan’s local jurisdiction stocks as well as
international stocks, and across multiple asset classifications, including
growth, value, and large and small capitalizations. Investment risk is measured
and monitored for each plan separately on an ongoing basis through periodic
investment portfolio reviews and annual liability measures.
The
Company expects to contribute $11.5 million to its pension plans during the
year
ended February 28, 2007.
Benefit
payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, expected
to be
paid during the next ten fiscal years are as follows:
(in
thousands)
|
||||
2007
|
$
|
11,632
|
||
2008
|
$
|
11,808
|
||
2009
|
$
|
15,397
|
||
2010
|
$
|
14,229
|
||
2011
|
$
|
15,957
|
||
2012
- 2016
|
$
|
93,652
|
84
13. POSTRETIREMENT
BENEFITS:
The
Company currently sponsors multiple unfunded postretirement benefit plans for
certain of its Constellation Beers and Spirits segment employees.
During
the year ended February 28, 2005, amendments to two of the unfunded
postretirement benefit plans, one modifying retiree contributions and the other
modifying eligibility requirements and retiree contributions, decreased the
postretirement benefit obligation by $0.4 million. During the year ended
February 29, 2004, an amendment to one of the unfunded postretirement benefit
plans modifying the eligibility requirements and retiree contributions decreased
the postretirement benefit obligation by $0.6 million.
The
Company uses a December 31 measurement date for all of its plans. The status
of
the plans is as follows:
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Change
in benefit obligation:
|
|||||||
Benefit
obligation as of March 1
|
$
|
4,989
|
$
|
5,460
|
|||
Service
cost
|
186
|
158
|
|||||
Interest
cost
|
264
|
275
|
|||||
Benefits
paid
|
(174
|
)
|
(186
|
)
|
|||
Plan
amendment
|
(8
|
)
|
(383
|
)
|
|||
Actuarial
loss (gain)
|
72
|
(499
|
)
|
||||
Foreign
currency exchange rate changes
|
231
|
164
|
|||||
Benefit
obligation as of the last day of February
|
$
|
5,560
|
$
|
4,989
|
|||
Funded
status as of the last day of February:
|
|||||||
Funded
status
|
$
|
(5,560
|
)
|
$
|
(4,989
|
)
|
|
Unrecognized
prior service cost
|
(618
|
)
|
(666
|
)
|
|||
Unrecognized
net loss
|
567
|
461
|
|||||
Accrued
benefit liability
|
$
|
(5,611
|
)
|
$
|
(5,194
|
)
|
Net
periodic benefit cost reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income includes
the following components:
For
the Years Ended
|
||||||||||
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
February
29,
2004
|
||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
186
|
$
|
158
|
$
|
147
|
||||
Interest
cost
|
264
|
275
|
282
|
|||||||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
(54
|
)
|
(21
|
)
|
7
|
|||||
Recognized
net actuarial gain (loss)
|
49
|
15
|
19
|
|||||||
Net
periodic benefit cost
|
$
|
445
|
$
|
427
|
$
|
455
|
The
following table sets forth the weighted average assumptions used in developing
the benefit obligation:
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||
Discount
rate
|
4.97%
|
5.86%
|
|
Rate
of compensation increase
|
3.50%
|
3.50%
|
85
The
following table sets forth the weighted average assumptions used in developing
the net periodic non-pension postretirement:
For
the Years Ended
|
|||
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||
Discount
rate
|
5.95%
|
6.00%
|
|
Rate
of compensation increase
|
3.50%
|
3.50%
|
The
following table sets forth the assumed health care cost trend rates as of
February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005:
February
28, 2006
|
February
28, 2005
|
||||||
|
U.S.
Plan
|
Non-U.S.
Plan
|
U.S.
Plan
|
Non-U.S.
Plan
|
|||
Health
care cost trend rate assumed for next year
|
10.0%
|
8.8%
|
9.0%
|
9.7%
|
|||
Rate
to which the cost trend rate is assumed to
decline
to (the ultimate trend rate)
|
3.5%
|
4.7%
|
4.0%
|
4.7%
|
|||
Year
that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate
|
2011
|
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
Assumed
health care trend rates could have a significant effect on the amount reported
for health care plans. A one percent change in assumed health care cost trend
rates would have the following effects:
|
1%
Increase
|
1%
Decrease
|
|||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Effect
on total service and interest cost components
|
$
|
62
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
||
Effect
on postretirement benefit obligation
|
$
|
649
|
$
|
(552
|
)
|
Benefit
payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, expected to
be
paid during the next ten fiscal years are as follows:
(in
thousands)
|
||||
2007
|
$
|
291
|
||
2008
|
$
|
306
|
||
2009
|
$
|
161
|
||
2010
|
$
|
158
|
||
2011
|
$
|
158
|
||
2012
- 2016
|
$
|
2,387
|
14. COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES:
Operating
leases -
Step
rent
provisions, escalation clauses, capital improvement funding and other lease
concessions, when present in the Company’s leases, are taken into account in
computing the minimum lease payments. The minimum lease payments for the
Company’s operating leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the
minimum lease term. Future payments under noncancelable operating leases having
initial or remaining terms of one year or more are as follows during the next
five fiscal years and thereafter:
(in
thousands)
|
||||
2007
|
$
|
65,586
|
||
2008
|
49,601
|
|||
2009
|
47,417
|
|||
2010
|
42,110
|
|||
2011
|
29,381
|
|||
Thereafter
|
223,282
|
|||
$
|
457,377
|
86
Rental
expense was
$69.5
million, $47.4 million, and $41.0 million for the years ended February 28,
2006,
February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004, respectively.
Purchase
commitments and contingencies -
The
Company has agreements with suppliers to purchase various spirits of which
certain agreements are denominated in British pound sterling. The maximum future
obligation under these agreements, based upon exchange rates at February 28,
2006, aggregate $26.1 million for contracts expiring through December
2012.
All
of
the Company’s imported beer products are marketed and sold pursuant to exclusive
distribution agreements from the suppliers of these products. The Company’s
agreement to distribute Corona Extra and its other Mexican beer brands
exclusively throughout 25 primarily western U.S. states expires in December
2006, with automatic five year renewals thereafter, subject to compliance with
certain performance criteria and other terms under the agreement. The remaining
agreements expire through December 2011. Prior to their expiration, these
agreements may be terminated if the Company fails to meet certain performance
criteria. At February 28, 2006, the Company believes it is in compliance with
all of its material distribution agreements and, given the Company’s long-term
relationships with its suppliers, the Company does not believe that these
agreements will be terminated.
In
connection with previous acquisitions as well as with the Hardy Acquisition
and
Robert Mondavi acquisition, the Company has assumed grape purchase contracts
with certain growers and suppliers. In addition, the Company has entered into
other grape purchase contracts with various growers and suppliers in the normal
course of business. Under the grape purchase contracts, the Company is committed
to purchase all grape production yielded from a specified number of acres for
a
period of time from one
to
sixteen
years.
The actual tonnage and price of grapes that must be purchased by the Company
will vary each year depending on certain factors, including weather, time of
harvest, overall market conditions and the agricultural practices and location
of the growers and suppliers under contract. The Company purchased $491.8
million and $368.4 million of grapes under contracts during the years ended
February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005, respectively. Based on current
production yields and published grape prices, the Company estimates that the
aggregate purchases under these contracts over the remaining terms of the
contracts will be $1,920.9 million.
In
connection with previous acquisitions as well as with the Hardy Acquisition
and
Robert Mondavi acquisition, the Company established a liability for the
estimated loss on firm purchase commitments assumed at the time of acquisition.
As of February 28, 2006, the remaining balance on this liability is $123.6
million.
The
Company’s aggregate obligations under bulk wine purchase contracts will be $82.5
million over the remaining terms of the contracts which extend through
fiscal
2014.
In
connection with the Hardy Acquisition, the Company assumed certain processing
contracts which commit the Company to utilize outside services to process and/or
package a minimum volume quantity. In addition, the Company entered into a
new
processing contract during the year ended February 29, 2004, utilizing outside
services to process a minimum volume of brandy at prices which are dependent
on
the processing ingredients provided by the Company. The Company’s aggregate
obligations under these processing contracts will be $76.3 million over the
remaining terms of the contracts which extend through December
2014.
87
Employment
contracts -
The
Company has employment contracts with certain of its executive officers and
certain other management personnel with either automatic one year renewals
or an
indefinite term of employment unless terminated by either party. These
employment contracts provide for minimum salaries, as adjusted for annual
increases, and may include incentive bonuses based upon attainment of specified
management goals. These employment contracts also provide for severance payments
in the event of specified termination of employment. In addition, the Company
has employment arrangements with certain other management personnel which
provide for severance payments in the event of specified termination of
employment. As of February 28, 2006, the aggregate commitment for future
compensation and severance, excluding incentive bonuses, was $8.2 million,
none
of which was accruable at that date.
Employees
covered by collective bargaining agreements -
Approximately
27.5% of the Company’s full-time employees are covered by collective bargaining
agreements at February 28, 2006. Agreements expiring within one year cover
approximately 17.5% of the Company’s full-time employees.
Legal
matters -
In
the
course of its business, the Company is subject to litigation from time to time.
Although the amount of any liability with respect to such litigation cannot
be
determined, in the opinion of management, such liability will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
15. STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY:
Common
stock -
The
Company has two classes of common stock: Class A Common Stock and Class B
Convertible Common Stock. Class B Convertible Common Stock shares are
convertible into shares of Class A Common Stock on a one-to-one basis at any
time at the option of the holder. Holders of Class B Convertible Common Stock
are entitled to ten votes per share. Holders of Class A Common Stock are
entitled to one vote per share and a cash dividend premium. If the Company
pays
a cash dividend on Class B Convertible Common Stock, each share of Class A
Common Stock will receive an amount at least ten percent greater than the amount
of the cash dividend per share paid on Class B Convertible Common Stock. In
addition, the Board of Directors may declare and pay a dividend on Class A
Common Stock without paying any dividend on Class B Convertible Common Stock.
However, under the terms of the Company’s senior credit facility, the Company is
currently constrained from paying cash dividends on its common stock. In
addition, the indentures for the Company’s outstanding senior notes and senior
subordinated notes may restrict the payment of cash dividends on its common
stock under certain circumstances.
In
July
2005, the stockholders of the Company approved an increase in the number of
authorized shares of Class A Common Stock from 275,000,000 shares to 300,000,000
shares, thereby increasing the aggregate number of authorized shares of the
Company’s common and preferred stock to 331,000,000 shares.
At
February 28, 2006, there were 199,177,164 shares of Class A Common Stock and
23,857,338 shares of Class B Convertible Common Stock outstanding, net of
treasury stock.
Common
stock splits -
During
May 2005, two-for-one stock splits of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and
Class B Convertible Common Stock were distributed in the form of stock dividends
to stockholders of record on April 29, 2005. All share and per share amounts
have been retroactively restated to give effect to the common stock
splits.
88
Stock
repurchase authorization -
In
February 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors replenished the June 1998
authorization to repurchase up to $100.0 million of the Company’s Class A Common
Stock and Class B Convertible Common Stock. The
Company may finance such purchases, which will become treasury shares, through
cash generated from operations or through the senior credit facility. No
shares
were repurchased under this program during the years ended February 28, 2006,
February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004.
Preferred
stock -
During
the year ended February 29, 2004, the Company issued 5.75% Series A Mandatory
Convertible Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stock”) (see “Equity Offerings”
discussion below). Dividends are cumulative and payable quarterly, if declared,
in cash, shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, or a combination thereof,
at the discretion of the Company. Dividends are payable, if declared, on the
first business day of March, June, September, and December of each year,
commencing on December 1, 2003. On September 1, 2006, the automatic conversion
date, each share of Preferred Stock will automatically convert into, subject
to
certain anti-dilution adjustments, between 58.552 and 71.432 shares of the
Company’s Class A Common Stock, depending on the then applicable market price of
the Company’s Class A Common Stock, in accordance with the following
table:
Applicable
market price
|
Conversion
rate
|
Less
than or equal to $14.00
|
71.432
shares
|
Between
$14.00 and $17.08
|
71.432
to 58.552 shares
|
Equal
to or greater than $17.08
|
58.552
shares
|
The
applicable market price is the average of the closing prices per share of the
Company’s Class A Common Stock on each of the 20 consecutive trading days ending
on the third trading day immediately preceding the applicable conversion date.
At any time prior to September 1, 2006, holders may elect to convert each share
of Preferred Stock, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments, into 58.552
shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. If the closing market price of the
Company’s Class A Common Stock exceeds $25.62 for at least 20 trading days
within a period of 30 consecutive trading days, the Company may elect, subject
to certain limitations and anti-dilution adjustments, to cause the conversion
of
all, but not less than all, of the then outstanding shares of Preferred Stock
into shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock at a conversion rate of 58.552
shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. In order for the Company to cause
the early conversion of the Preferred Stock, the Company must pay all accrued
and unpaid dividends on the Preferred Stock as well as the present value of
all
remaining dividend payments through and including September 1, 2006. If the
Company is involved in a merger in which at least 30% of the consideration
for
all or any class of the Company’s common stock consists of cash or cash
equivalents, then on or after the date of such merger, each holder will have
the
right to convert each share of Preferred Stock into the number of shares of
the
Company’s Class A Common Stock applicable on the automatic conversion date. The
Preferred Stock ranks senior in right of payment to all of the Company’s common
stock and has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, plus accrued and
unpaid dividends.
As
of
February 28, 2006, 170,500 shares of Preferred Stock were outstanding and $2.5
million of dividends were accrued.
89
Equity
offerings -
During
July 2003, the Company completed a public offering of 19,600,000 shares of
its
Class A Common Stock resulting in net proceeds to the Company, after deducting
underwriting discounts and expenses, of $261.2 million. In addition, the Company
also completed a public offering of 170,500 shares of its 5.75% Series A
Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock resulting in net proceeds to the Company,
after deducting underwriting discounts and expenses, of $164.9 million. The
Class A Common Stock offering and the Preferred Stock offering are referred
to
together as the “2003 Equity Offerings.” The majority of the net proceeds from
the 2003 Equity Offerings were used to repay the Company’s then existing bridge
loans that were incurred to partially finance the Hardy Acquisition. The
remaining proceeds were used to repay term loan borrowings under the Company’s
then existing senior credit facility.
Long-term
stock incentive plan -
Under
the
Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, nonqualified stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock and other stock-based awards may be
granted to employees, officers and directors of the Company. The aggregate
number of shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock available for awards
under the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan is 80,000,000 shares. The
exercise price, vesting period and term of nonqualified stock options granted
are established by the committee administering the plan (the “Committee”). The
exercise price of any nonqualified stock option may not be less than the fair
market value of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on the date of grant. Grants
of stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other stock-based awards
may
contain such vesting, terms, conditions and other requirements as the Committee
may establish. During
the years ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004,
no
stock appreciation rights were granted. During the year ended February 28,
2006,
7,150 shares of restricted Class A Common Stock were granted at a grant date
fair value of $27.96 per share. During the year ended February 28, 2005, 5,330
shares of restricted Class A Common Stock were granted at a grant date fair
value of $18.86 per share. No restricted stock was granted during the year
ended
February 29, 2004.
Incentive
stock option plan -
Under
the
Company’s Incentive Stock Option Plan, incentive stock options may be granted to
employees, including officers, of the Company. Grants, in the aggregate, may
not
exceed 8,000,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. The exercise
price of any incentive stock option may not be less than the fair market value
of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on the date of grant. The vesting period
and term of incentive stock options granted are established by the Committee.
The maximum term of incentive stock options is ten years.
90
A
summary
of stock option activity under the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and
the Incentive Stock Option Plan is as follows:
Shares
Under
Option
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Options
Exercisable
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
||||||||||
Balance,
February 28, 2003
|
22,815,862
|
$
|
7.78
|
16,691,710
|
$
|
6.79
|
|||||||
Options
granted
|
5,632,714
|
$
|
11.93
|
||||||||||
Options
exercised
|
(5,224,622
|
)
|
$
|
6.94
|
|||||||||
Options
forfeited/canceled
|
(649,008
|
)
|
$
|
12.80
|
|||||||||
Balance,
February 29, 2004
|
22,574,946
|
$
|
8.86
|
17,642,596
|
$
|
7.90
|
|||||||
Options
granted
|
6,826,050
|
$
|
18.31
|
||||||||||
Options
exercised
|
(5,421,978
|
)
|
$
|
8.93
|
|||||||||
Options
forfeited/canceled
|
(378,268
|
)
|
$
|
15.10
|
|||||||||
Balance,
February 28, 2005
|
23,600,750
|
$
|
11.48
|
20,733,345
|
$
|
10.45
|
|||||||
Options
granted
|
3,952,825
|
$
|
27.24
|
||||||||||
Options
exercised
|
(3,662,997
|
)
|
$
|
8.56
|
|||||||||
Options
forfeited/canceled
|
(237,620
|
)
|
$
|
24.62
|
|||||||||
Balance,
February 28, 2006
|
23,652,958
|
$
|
14.43
|
23,149,228
|
$
|
14.43
|
The
following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at
February 28, 2006:
Options
Outstanding
|
Options
Exercisable
|
|||||||||||||||
Range
of
Exercise
Prices
|
Number
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Number
Exercisable
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||||||
$
2.13 - $ 8.87
|
6,795,179
|
3.6
years
|
$
|
6.83
|
6,795,179
|
$
|
6.83
|
|||||||||
$10.67
- $15.51
|
7,333,468
|
6.5
years
|
$
|
11.67
|
6,945,648
|
$
|
11.66
|
|||||||||
$16.19
- $23.23
|
5,531,186
|
8.3
years
|
$
|
18.29
|
5,465,786
|
$
|
18.27
|
|||||||||
$24.73
- $30.52
|
3,993,125
|
9.1
years
|
$
|
27.12
|
3,942,615
|
$
|
27.11
|
|||||||||
23,652,958
|
6.5
years
|
$
|
14.43
|
23,149,228
|
$
|
14.43
|
The
weighted average fair value of options granted during the years ended February
28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004, was $9.55,
$7.20,
and $4.87, respectively. The fair value of options is estimated on the date
of
grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 4.1%, 3.6%, and 3.2% for the
years ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004,
respectively; volatility of 31.3%, 33.6%, and 35.7% for the years ended February
28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004, respectively; and expected
option life of 5.0 years, 6.0 years, and 6.2
years
for the years ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29,
2004,
respectively. The dividend yield was 0% for the years ended February 28, 2006,
February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004. Forfeitures are recognized as they
occur.
Employee
stock purchase plans -
The
Company has a stock purchase plan under which 9,000,000 shares of Class A Common
Stock may be issued. Under the terms of the plan, eligible employees may
purchase shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock through payroll
deductions. The purchase price is the lower of 85% of the fair market value
of
the stock on the first or last day of the purchase period. During the years
ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004, employees
purchased 249,507, 274,106, and 275,970 shares, respectively.
91
The
weighted average fair value of purchase rights granted during the years ended
February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004, was $6.23, $4.98,
and $3.30, respectively. The fair value of purchase rights is estimated on
the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
weighted average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 4.2%, 2.2%, and 1.0%
for the years ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29,
2004,
respectively; volatility of 27.2%, 24.5%, and 22.3% for the years ended February
28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004, respectively; and expected
purchase right life of 0.5 years for the years ended February 28, 2006, February
28, 2005, and February 29, 2004. The dividend yield was 0% for the years ended
February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004.
The
Company has a stock purchase plan under which 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s
Class A Common Stock may be issued to eligible employees and directors of the
Company’s U.K. subsidiaries. Under the terms of the plan, participants may
purchase shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock through payroll
deductions. The purchase price may be no less than 80% of the closing price
of
the stock on the day the purchase price is fixed by the committee administering
the plan. During the years ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and
February 29, 2004, employees purchased 92,622, 74,164, and 55,582 shares,
respectively. During the years ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005,
and
February 29, 2004, there were no purchase rights granted.
16.
EARNINGS
PER COMMON SHARE:
Earnings
per common share are as follows:
For
the Years Ended
|
||||||||||
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
February
29,
2004
|
||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
325,262
|
$
|
276,464
|
$
|
220,414
|
||||
Dividends
on preferred stock
|
(9,804
|
)
|
(9,804
|
)
|
(5,746
|
)
|
||||
Income
available to common stockholders
|
$
|
315,458
|
$
|
266,660
|
$
|
214,668
|
||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - basic:
|
||||||||||
Class
A Common Stock
|
196,907
|
191,489
|
177,267
|
|||||||
Class
B Common Stock
|
23,904
|
24,043
|
24,137
|
|||||||
Total
weighted average common shares outstanding - basic
|
220,811
|
215,532
|
201,404
|
|||||||
Stock
options
|
7,913
|
7,545
|
6,628
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock
|
9,983
|
9,983
|
5,865
|
|||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - diluted
|
238,707
|
233,060
|
213,897
|
|||||||
Earnings
per common share - basic:
|
||||||||||
Class
A Common Stock
|
$
|
1.44
|
$
|
1.25
|
$
|
1.08
|
||||
Class
B Common Stock
|
$
|
1.31
|
$
|
1.14
|
$
|
.98
|
||||
Earnings
per common share - diluted
|
$
|
1.36
|
$
|
1.19
|
$
|
1.03
|
Stock
options to purchase 3.6 million, 1.6 million, and 0.2 million shares of Class
A
Common Stock at a weighted average price per share of $27.30, $23.27, and $15.55
were outstanding during the years ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005,
and February 29, 2004, respectively, but were not included in the computation
of
the diluted earnings per common share because the stock options’ exercise price
was greater than the average market price of the Class A Common Stock for the
respective periods.
92
17. ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss, net of tax effects, includes the following
components:
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
|
Net
Unrealized
Gains
on
Derivatives
|
Unrealized
Loss
on
Marketable
Equity
Securities
|
Minimum
Pension
Liability
Adjustment
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
|
||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance,
February 28, 2005
|
$
|
473,949
|
$
|
37,316
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(79,422
|
)
|
$
|
431,843
|
|||||
Current
period change
|
(159,242
|
)
|
(6,278
|
)
|
(4
|
)
|
(18,892
|
)
|
(184,416
|
)
|
||||||
Balance,
February 28, 2006
|
$
|
314,707
|
$
|
31,038
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
$
|
(98,314
|
)
|
$
|
247,427
|
During
the year ended February 28, 2006, the Company changed the structure of certain
of its cash flow hedges of forecasted foreign currency denominated transactions.
As a result, the Company received $18.5 million in proceeds from the early
termination of related foreign currency derivative instruments. As the
forecasted transactions are still probable, this amount was recorded to AOCI
and
will be reclassified from AOCI into earnings in the same periods in which the
original hedged items are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
See
Note 9 for discussion of $30.3 million cash proceeds received from the early
termination of interest rate swap agreements in March 2005.
18. SIGNIFICANT
CUSTOMERS AND CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK:
Sales
to
the five largest customers represented 18.5%, 21.5%, and 20.6% of the Company’s
sales for the years ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February
29,
2004, respectively. No single customer was responsible for greater than 10%
of
sales during these years. Accounts receivable from the Company’s largest
customer, Southern Wine and Spirits, represented 8.6%, 10.2%, and 8.3% of the
Company’s total accounts receivable as of February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005,
and February 29, 2004, respectively. Sales to the Company’s five largest
customers are expected to continue to represent a significant portion of the
Company’s revenues. The Company’s arrangements with certain of its customers
may, generally, be terminated by either party with prior notice. The Company
performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial position, and
management of the Company is of the opinion that any risk of significant loss
is
reduced due to the diversity of customers and geographic sales
area.
19. ACQUISITION-RELATED
INTEGRATION COSTS:
For
the
year ended February 28, 2006, the Company recorded $16.8 million of
acquisition-related integration costs associated with the Company’s decision to
restructure and integrate the operations of Robert Mondavi (the “Robert Mondavi
Plan”). Acquisition-related integration costs included $5.3 million of
employee-related costs and $11.5 million of facilities and other one-time costs.
For the year ended February 28, 2005, the Company recorded $9.4 million of
acquisition-related integration costs associated with the Robert Mondavi
Plan.
93
20. RESTRUCTURING
AND RELATED CHARGES:
For
the
year ended February 28, 2006, the Company recorded $29.3 million of
restructuring and related charges associated with (i) the further realignment
of
business operations as previously announced in Fiscal 2004, a component of
the
Fiscal 2004 Plan (as defined below), (ii) the Robert Mondavi Plan, and (iii)
costs associated with the worldwide wine reorganization announced in February
2006 (including certain personnel reductions in the U.K. during the third
quarter of fiscal 2006) and the Company’s program to consolidate certain west
coast production processes in the U.S. (collectively, the “Fiscal 2006 Plan”).
Included in the $29.3 million of restructuring and related charges incurred
for
the year ended February 28, 2006, is $6.9 million of non-cash charges for
stock-based compensation (which are excluded from the table below).
For
the
year ended February 28, 2006, restructuring and related charges recorded in
connection with the Fiscal 2004 Plan included $0.7 million of employee
termination benefit costs and $1.3 million of facility consolidation and
relocation costs. Restructuring and related charges recorded in connection
with
the Robert Mondavi Plan included $1.6 million of employee termination benefit
costs, $0.7 million of contract termination costs and $0.5 million of facility
consolidation and relocation costs. Restructuring and related charges recorded
in connection with the Fiscal 2006 Plan included $24.3 million of employee
termination benefit costs and $0.2 million of facility consolidation and
relocation costs. In addition, in connection with the Fiscal 2006 Plan, the
Company recorded (i) $13.4 million of accelerated depreciation charges in
connection with the Company’s investment in new assets and reconfiguration of
certain existing assets under the plan, which was recorded in cost of product
sold, and (ii) $0.1 million of other related costs which was recorded in
selling, general and administrative expenses. For the year ended February 28,
2005, the Company recorded $7.6 million of restructuring and related charges
associated with (i) the further realignment of business operations as previously
announced in Fiscal 2004, (ii) the Company’s decision in Fiscal 2004 to exit the
commodity concentrate product line in the U.S. (collectively, the “Fiscal 2004
Plan”), and the Robert Mondavi Plan. For the year ended February 29, 2004, the
Company recorded $31.1 million of restructuring and related charges associated
with the Fiscal 2004 Plan. In addition, in connection with the Company’s
decision to exit the commodity concentrate product line in the U.S., the Company
recorded a write-down of concentrate inventory of $16.8 million for the year
ended February 29, 2004, which was recorded in cost of product
sold.
The
Company estimates that the Fiscal 2004 Plan will include (i) a total of $10.2
million of employee termination benefit costs through February 28, 2007, of
which $10.2 million has been incurred through February 28, 2006, (ii) a total
of
$19.2 million of contract termination costs through February 28, 2007, of which
$19.2 million has been incurred through February 28, 2006, and (iii) a total
of
$4.6 million of facility consolidation and relocation costs through February
28,
2007, of which $4.2 million has been incurred through February 28,
2006.
The
Company estimates that the Robert Mondavi Plan will include (i) a total of
$2.6
million of employee termination benefit costs through February 28, 2007, of
which $2.6 million has been incurred through February 28, 2006, (ii) a total
of
$1.1 million of contract termination costs through February 28, 2007, of which
$0.7 million has been incurred through February 28, 2006, and (iii) a total
of
$0.5 million of facility consolidation and relocation costs through February
28,
2007, of which $0.5 million has been incurred through February 28,
2006.
94
The
Company estimates that the Fiscal 2006 Plan will include (i) a total of $32.0
million of employee termination benefit costs through February 28, 2007, of
which $24.3 million has been incurred through February 28, 2006, (ii) a total
of
$3.0 million of contract termination costs through February 28, 2007, none
of
which has been incurred through February 28, 2006, and (iii) a total of $13.5
million of facility consolidation and relocation costs through February 28,
2007, of which $0.2 million has been incurred through February 28, 2006. In
addition, the Company expects to incur accelerated depreciation charges of
$20.4
million through February 28, 2007, of which $13.4 million has been incurred
through February 28, 2006. Amounts associated with the accelerated depreciation
charges are recorded in cost of product sold in the Company’s Consolidated
Statements of Income. Lastly, the Company expects to incur other related costs
of $8.4 million through February 28, 2007, of which $0.1 million has been
incurred through February 28, 2006. Amounts associated with the other related
costs will be recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the
Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
In
connection with the Robert Mondavi acquisition, the Company accrued $50.5
million of liabilities
for exit costs as of the acquisition date. The Robert Mondavi acquisition line
item in the table below reflects adjustments to the fair value of liabilities
assumed in the acquisition. The balance of these purchase accounting accruals
was $8.1 million and $37.6 million as of February 28, 2006, and February 28,
2005, respectively.
The
following table illustrates the changes in the restructuring liability balance
since February 28, 2005:
Employee
Termination
Benefit
Costs
|
Contract
Termination
Costs
|
Facility
Consolidation/
Relocation
Costs
|
Total
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
February 28, 2005
|
$
|
15,270
|
$
|
23,204
|
$
|
743
|
$
|
39,217
|
|||||
Robert
Mondavi acquisition
|
2,377
|
2,988
|
(556
|
)
|
4,809
|
||||||||
Restructuring
charges
|
19,730
|
699
|
1,960
|
22,389
|
|||||||||
Cash
expenditures
|
(20,629
|
)
|
(18,588
|
)
|
(1,563
|
)
|
(40,780
|
)
|
|||||
Foreign
currency adjustments
|
(105
|
)
|
(189
|
)
|
(56
|
)
|
(350
|
)
|
|||||
Balance,
February 28, 2006
|
$
|
16,643
|
$
|
8,114
|
$
|
528
|
$
|
25,285
|
21. CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
The
following information sets forth the condensed consolidating balance sheets
as
of February 28, 2006, and February 28, 2005, the condensed consolidating
statements of income and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended February 28, 2006, for the Company, the parent company, the combined
subsidiaries of the Company which guarantee the Company’s senior notes and
senior subordinated notes (“Subsidiary Guarantors”) and the combined
subsidiaries of the Company which are not Subsidiary Guarantors, primarily
Matthew Clark and Hardy and their subsidiaries, which
are
included in the Constellation Wines segment (“Subsidiary Nonguarantors”). The
Subsidiary Guarantors are wholly owned and the guarantees are full,
unconditional, joint and several obligations of each of the Subsidiary
Guarantors. Separate financial statements for the Subsidiary Guarantors of
the
Company are not presented because the Company has determined that such financial
statements would not be material to investors. The accounting policies of
the
parent company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Subsidiary Nonguarantors
are
the same as those described for the Company in the Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies in Note 1 and include the recently adopted accounting
pronouncements described in Note 2. There are no restrictions on the ability
of
the Subsidiary Guarantors to transfer funds to the Company in the form of
cash
dividends, loans or advances.
95
Parent
Company
|
Subsidiary
Guarantors
|
Subsidiary
Nonguarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet at February 28, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash investments
|
$
|
908
|
$
|
2,948
|
$
|
7,022
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
10,878
|
||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
233,042
|
196,070
|
342,763
|
-
|
771,875
|
|||||||||||
Inventories
|
38,677
|
1,033,281
|
647,408
|
(14,934
|
)
|
1,704,432
|
||||||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
13,574
|
150,046
|
45,622
|
4,428
|
213,670
|
|||||||||||
Intercompany
receivable (payable)
|
136,376
|
(709,428
|
)
|
573,052
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||
Total
current assets
|
422,577
|
672,917
|
1,615,867
|
(10,506
|
)
|
2,700,855
|
||||||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
35,573
|
729,628
|
660,097
|
-
|
1,425,298
|
|||||||||||
Investments
in subsidiaries
|
5,197,047
|
1,785,287
|
-
|
(6,982,334
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||||
Goodwill
|
-
|
1,325,046
|
868,537
|
-
|
2,193,583
|
|||||||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
-
|
549,802
|
334,078
|
-
|
883,880
|
|||||||||||
Other
assets, net
|
24,899
|
118,295
|
53,744
|
-
|
196,938
|
|||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
5,680,096
|
$
|
5,180,975
|
$
|
3,532,323
|
$
|
(6,992,840
|
)
|
$
|
7,400,554
|
|||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes
payable to banks
|
$
|
54,500
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
25,381
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
79,881
|
||||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
200,065
|
4,600
|
9,401
|
-
|
214,066
|
|||||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
4,439
|
123,622
|
184,778
|
-
|
312,839
|
|||||||||||
Accrued
excise taxes
|
15,542
|
42,796
|
18,324
|
-
|
76,662
|
|||||||||||
Other
accrued expenses and liabilities
|
230,639
|
163,831
|
220,425
|
(283
|
)
|
614,612
|
||||||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
505,185
|
334,849
|
458,309
|
(283
|
)
|
1,298,060
|
||||||||||
Long-term
debt, less current maturities
|
2,485,539
|
12,769
|
17,472
|
-
|
2,515,780
|
|||||||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(12,840
|
)
|
359,920
|
24,166
|
-
|
371,246
|
||||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
5,413
|
70,294
|
164,590
|
-
|
240,297
|
|||||||||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
|||||||||||
Class
A and Class B common stock
|
2,326
|
6,443
|
141,583
|
(148,026
|
)
|
2,326
|
||||||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
1,159,421
|
2,301,961
|
2,498,737
|
(4,800,698
|
)
|
1,159,421
|
||||||||||
Retained
earnings
|
1,606,023
|
1,934,899
|
98,712
|
(2,047,323
|
)
|
1,592,311
|
||||||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive
income
(loss)
|
(44,657
|
)
|
159,840
|
128,754
|
3,490
|
247,427
|
||||||||||
Treasury
stock and other
|
(26,316
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(26,316
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
2,696,799
|
4,403,143
|
2,867,786
|
(6,992,557
|
)
|
2,975,171
|
||||||||||
Total
liabilities and
stockholders’
equity
|
$
|
5,680,096
|
$
|
5,180,975
|
$
|
3,532,323
|
$
|
(6,992,840
|
)
|
$
|
7,400,554
|
96
Parent
Company
|
Subsidiary
Guarantors
|
Subsidiary
Nonguarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet at February 28, 2005
|
||||||||||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash investments
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
10,095
|
$
|
7,540
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
17,635
|
||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
132,997
|
293,588
|
423,057
|
-
|
849,642
|
|||||||||||
Inventories
|
35,719
|
943,711
|
637,556
|
(9,251
|
)
|
1,607,735
|
||||||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
41,515
|
163,910
|
53,598
|
-
|
259,023
|
|||||||||||
Intercompany receivable
(payable)
|
450,781
|
(1,111,951
|
)
|
661,170
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||
Total
current assets
|
661,012
|
299,353
|
1,782,921
|
(9,251
|
)
|
2,734,035
|
||||||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
37,476
|
884,690
|
674,201
|
-
|
1,596,367
|
|||||||||||
Investments
in subsidiaries
|
4,961,521
|
1,844,354
|
-
|
(6,805,875
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||||
Goodwill
|
-
|
1,242,132
|
940,537
|
-
|
2,182,669
|
|||||||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
-
|
587,075
|
358,575
|
-
|
945,650
|
|||||||||||
Other
assets, net
|
28,559
|
221,642
|
95,250
|
-
|
345,451
|
|||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
5,688,568
|
$
|
5,079,246
|
$
|
3,851,484
|
$
|
(6,815,126
|
)
|
$
|
7,804,172
|
|||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes
payable to banks
|
$
|
14,000
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
2,475
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
16,475
|
||||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
60,068
|
4,307
|
3,719
|
-
|
68,094
|
|||||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
4,237
|
146,116
|
194,901
|
-
|
345,254
|
|||||||||||
Accrued
excise taxes
|
13,633
|
41,070
|
19,653
|
-
|
74,356
|
|||||||||||
Other
accrued expenses and liabilities
|
146,837
|
191,438
|
298,529
|
(2,896
|
)
|
633,908
|
||||||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
238,775
|
382,931
|
519,277
|
(2,896
|
)
|
1,138,087
|
||||||||||
Long-term
debt, less current maturities
|
3,167,852
|
9,089
|
27,766
|
-
|
3,204,707
|
|||||||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(17,255
|
)
|
377,423
|
29,718
|
-
|
389,886
|
||||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
1,101
|
126,173
|
164,305
|
-
|
291,579
|
|||||||||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
|||||||||||
Class
A and Class B common stock
|
2,288
|
6,443
|
141,583
|
(148,026
|
)
|
2,288
|
||||||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
1,097,177
|
2,301,961
|
2,498,737
|
(4,800,698
|
)
|
1,097,177
|
||||||||||
Retained
earnings
|
1,285,762
|
1,715,182
|
141,969
|
(1,866,060
|
)
|
1,276,853
|
||||||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive
income
(loss)
|
(58,884
|
)
|
160,044
|
328,129
|
2,554
|
431,843
|
||||||||||
Treasury
stock and other
|
(28,250
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(28,250
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
2,298,095
|
4,183,630
|
3,110,418
|
(6,812,230
|
)
|
2,779,913
|
||||||||||
Total
liabilities and
stockholders’
equity
|
$
|
5,688,568
|
$
|
5,079,246
|
$
|
3,851,484
|
$
|
(6,815,126
|
)
|
$
|
7,804,172
|
97
Parent
Company
|
Subsidiary
Guarantors
|
Subsidiary
Nonguarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Income for the Year Ended February 28,
2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
$
|
1,300,576
|
$
|
3,006,118
|
$
|
2,613,992
|
$
|
(1,213,761
|
)
|
$
|
5,706,925
|
|||||
Less
- excise taxes
|
(166,757
|
)
|
(438,498
|
)
|
(498,222
|
)
|
-
|
(1,103,477
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
sales
|
1,133,819
|
2,567,620
|
2,115,770
|
(1,213,761
|
)
|
4,603,448
|
||||||||||
Cost
of product sold
|
(911,117
|
)
|
(1,834,659
|
)
|
(1,739,896
|
)
|
1,206,813
|
(3,278,859
|
)
|
|||||||
Gross
profit
|
222,702
|
732,961
|
375,874
|
(6,948
|
)
|
1,324,589
|
||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
expenses
|
(175,226
|
)
|
(233,607
|
)
|
(203,571
|
)
|
-
|
(612,404
|
)
|
|||||||
Acquisition-related
integration costs
|
-
|
(15,668
|
)
|
(1,120
|
)
|
-
|
(16,788
|
)
|
||||||||
Restructuring
and related charges
|
(1,692
|
)
|
(11,583
|
)
|
(16,007
|
)
|
-
|
(29,282
|
)
|
|||||||
Operating income
|
45,784
|
|
472,103
|
155,176
|
(6,948
|
)
|
666,115
|
|||||||||
Gain
on change in fair value of
derivative
instruments
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Equity
in earnings of equity
method
investees
|
298,889
|
72,107
|
(4,263
|
)
|
(365,908
|
)
|
825
|
|||||||||
Interest
income (expense), net
|
(28,464
|
)
|
(194,123
|
)
|
32,905
|
-
|
(189,682
|
)
|
||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
316,209
|
350,087
|
183,818
|
(372,856
|
)
|
477,258
|
||||||||||
Benefit
from (provision for)
income
taxes
|
13,856
|
(109,801
|
)
|
(58,195
|
)
|
2,144
|
(151,996
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
330,065
|
240,286
|
125,623
|
(370,712
|
)
|
325,262
|
||||||||||
Dividends
on preferred stock
|
(9,804
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(9,804
|
)
|
|||||||||
Income
available to common
stockholders
|
$
|
320,261
|
$
|
240,286
|
$
|
125,623
|
$
|
(370,712
|
)
|
$
|
315,458
|
|||||
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Income for the Year Ended February 28,
2005
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
$
|
823,873
|
$
|
2,585,660
|
$
|
2,563,199
|
$
|
(832,869
|
)
|
$
|
5,139,863
|
|||||
Less
- excise taxes
|
(148,269
|
)
|
(435,984
|
)
|
(467,972
|
)
|
-
|
(1,052,225
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
sales
|
675,604
|
2,149,676
|
2,095,227
|
(832,869
|
)
|
4,087,638
|
||||||||||
Cost
of product sold
|
(547,882
|
)
|
(1,502,234
|
)
|
(1,724,195
|
)
|
827,262
|
(2,947,049
|
)
|
|||||||
Gross
profit
|
127,722
|
647,442
|
371,032
|
(5,607
|
)
|
1,140,589
|
||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
expenses
|
(155,687
|
)
|
(217,967
|
)
|
(182,040
|
)
|
-
|
(555,694
|
)
|
|||||||
Acquisition-related
integration costs
|
-
|
(9,421
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(9,421
|
)
|
|||||||||
Restructuring
charges
|
-
|
(4,203
|
)
|
(3,375
|
)
|
-
|
(7,578
|
)
|
||||||||
Operating (loss)
income
|
(27,965
|
)
|
415,851
|
185,617
|
(5,607
|
)
|
567,896
|
|||||||||
Gain
on change in fair value of
derivative
instruments
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Equity
in earnings of equity
method
investees
|
282,858
|
107,970
|
(115
|
)
|
(388,960
|
)
|
1,753
|
|||||||||
Interest
income (expense), net
|
21,425
|
(125,226
|
)
|
(33,874
|
)
|
-
|
(137,675
|
)
|
||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
276,318
|
398,595
|
151,628
|
(394,567
|
)
|
431,974
|
||||||||||
Benefit
from (provision for) income taxes
|
1,683
|
(114,797
|
)
|
(46,467
|
)
|
4,071
|
(155,510
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
278,001
|
283,798
|
105,161
|
(390,496
|
)
|
276,464
|
||||||||||
Dividends
on preferred stock
|
(9,804
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(9,804
|
)
|
|||||||||
Income
available to common
stockholders
|
$
|
268,197
|
$
|
283,798
|
$
|
105,161
|
$
|
(390,496
|
)
|
$
|
266,660
|
98
Parent
Company
|
Subsidiary
Guarantors
|
Subsidiary
Nonguarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Income for the Year Ended February 29,
2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
$
|
814,042
|
$
|
2,276,747
|
$
|
1,866,165
|
$
|
(487,684
|
)
|
$
|
4,469,270
|
|||||
Less
- excise taxes
|
(143,964
|
)
|
(417,130
|
)
|
(355,747
|
)
|
-
|
(916,841
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
sales
|
670,078
|
1,859,617
|
1,510,418
|
(487,684
|
)
|
3,552,429
|
||||||||||
Cost
of product sold
|
(553,391
|
)
|
(1,291,532
|
)
|
(1,212,105
|
)
|
480,387
|
(2,576,641
|
)
|
|||||||
Gross
profit
|
116,687
|
568,085
|
298,313
|
(7,297
|
)
|
975,788
|
||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
expenses
|
(115,163
|
)
|
(171,036
|
)
|
(171,078
|
)
|
-
|
(457,277
|
)
|
|||||||
Acquisition-related
integration costs
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Restructuring
charges
|
-
|
(40,567
|
)
|
9,413
|
-
|
(31,154
|
)
|
|||||||||
Operating
income
|
1,524
|
356,482
|
136,648
|
(7,297
|
)
|
487,357
|
||||||||||
Gain
on change in fair value of
derivative
instruments
|
1,181
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,181
|
|||||||||||
Equity
in earnings of equity
method
investees
|
215,775
|
90,157
|
2
|
(305,392
|
)
|
542
|
||||||||||
Interest
income (expense), net
|
15,945
|
(154,914
|
)
|
(5,714
|
)
|
-
|
(144,683
|
)
|
||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
234,425
|
291,725
|
130,936
|
(312,689
|
)
|
344,397
|
||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
(6,714
|
)
|
(75,950
|
)
|
(41,319
|
)
|
-
|
(123,983
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
227,711
|
215,775
|
89,617
|
(312,689
|
)
|
220,414
|
||||||||||
Dividends
on preferred stock
|
(5,746
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(5,746
|
)
|
|||||||||
Income
available to common
stockholders
|
$
|
221,965
|
$
|
215,775
|
$
|
89,617
|
$
|
(312,689
|
)
|
$
|
214,668
|
|||||
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Year Ended February
28,
2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by
operating
activities
|
$
|
(23,579
|
)
|
$
|
272,120
|
$
|
187,430
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
435,971
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Purchases
of property, plant and
equipment
|
(5,200
|
)
|
(52,329
|
)
|
(74,969
|
)
|
-
|
(132,498
|
)
|
|||||||
Purchases
of businesses, net of
cash
acquired
|
-
|
(45,893
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(45,893
|
)
|
|||||||||
Payment
of accrued earn-out amount
|
-
|
(3,088
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(3,088
|
)
|
|||||||||
Investment
in equity method investee
|
-
|
(2,723
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(2,723
|
)
|
|||||||||
Proceeds
from sales of assets
|
4
|
118,294
|
1,381
|
-
|
119,679
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from sales of equity
method
investments
|
-
|
35,953
|
-
|
-
|
35,953
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from sales of businesses
|
-
|
17,861
|
-
|
-
|
17,861
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from sales of marketable
equity
securities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Other
investing activities
|
-
|
(5,000
|
)
|
151
|
-
|
(4,849
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by
investing
activities
|
(5,196
|
)
|
63,075
|
(73,437
|
)
|
-
|
(15,558
|
)
|
99
Parent
Company
|
Subsidiary
Guarantors
|
Subsidiary
Nonguarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Principal
payments of long-term debt
|
(516,567
|
)
|
(7,311
|
)
|
(3,715
|
)
|
-
|
(527,593
|
)
|
|||||||
Payment
of preferred stock dividends
|
(9,804
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(9,804
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
proceeds from notes payable
|
40,500
|
-
|
23,302
|
-
|
63,802
|
|||||||||||
Exercise
of employee stock options
|
31,504
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
31,504
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of long-term
debt
|
83
|
8,842
|
700
|
-
|
9,625
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from employee stock
purchases
|
6,229
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6,229
|
|||||||||||
Payment
of issuance costs of
long-term
debt
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from equity offerings,
net
of fees
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Intercompany
financings, net
|
477,738
|
(343,629
|
)
|
(134,109
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in)
financing
activities
|
29,683
|
(342,098
|
)
|
(113,822
|
)
|
-
|
(426,237
|
)
|
||||||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on
cash
and cash investments
|
-
|
(244
|
)
|
(689
|
)
|
-
|
(933
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and
cash
investments
|
908
|
(7,147
|
)
|
(518
|
)
|
-
|
(6,757
|
)
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash investments, beginning
of
year
|
-
|
10,095
|
7,540
|
-
|
17,635
|
|||||||||||
Cash
and cash investments, end of year
|
$
|
908
|
$
|
2,948
|
$
|
7,022
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
10,878
|
||||||
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Year Ended February
28,
2005
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by
operating
activities
|
$
|
(5,108
|
)
|
$
|
213,887
|
$
|
111,921
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
320,700
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Purchases
of property, plant and
equipment
|
(7,301
|
)
|
(45,839
|
)
|
(66,524
|
)
|
-
|
(119,664
|
)
|
|||||||
Purchases
of businesses, net of
cash
acquired
|
(1,035,086
|
)
|
(8,485
|
)
|
(8,900
|
)
|
-
|
(1,052,471
|
)
|
|||||||
Payment
of accrued earn-out amount
|
-
|
(2,618
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(2,618
|
)
|
|||||||||
Investment
in equity method investee
|
-
|
-
|
(86,121
|
)
|
-
|
(86,121
|
)
|
|||||||||
Proceeds
from sales of assets
|
-
|
181
|
13,590
|
-
|
13,771
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from sales of equity
method
investments
|
-
|
9,884
|
-
|
-
|
9,884
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from sales of businesses
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of marketable
equity
securities
|
-
|
-
|
14,359
|
-
|
14,359
|
|||||||||||
Other
investing activities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(1,042,387
|
)
|
(46,877
|
)
|
(133,596
|
)
|
-
|
(1,222,860
|
)
|
100
Parent
Company
|
Subsidiary
Guarantors
|
Subsidiary
Nonguarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Principal
payments of long-term debt
|
(1,179,562
|
)
|
(302,189
|
)
|
(6,935
|
)
|
-
|
(1,488,686
|
)
|
|||||||
Payment
of preferred stock dividends
|
(9,804
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(9,804
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
repayment of notes payable
|
14,000
|
(60,000
|
)
|
142
|
-
|
(45,858
|
)
|
|||||||||
Exercise
of employee stock options
|
48,241
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
48,241
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of long-term
debt
|
2,400,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,400,000
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from employee stock
purchases
|
4,690
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4,690
|
|||||||||||
Payment
of issuance costs of
long-term
debt
|
(24,403
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(24,403
|
)
|
|||||||||
Proceeds
from equity offerings,
net
of fees
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Intercompany
financing activities, net
|
(206,756
|
)
|
200,891
|
5,865
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in)
financing
activities
|
1,046,406
|
(161,298
|
)
|
(928
|
)
|
-
|
884,180
|
|||||||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on
cash
and cash investments
|
41
|
(281
|
)
|
(1,281
|
)
|
-
|
(1,521
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and
cash
investments
|
(1,048
|
)
|
5,431
|
(23,884
|
)
|
-
|
(19,501
|
)
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash investments, beginning
of
year
|
1,048
|
4,664
|
31,424
|
-
|
37,136
|
|||||||||||
Cash
and cash investments, end of year
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
10,095
|
$
|
7,540
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
17,635
|
||||||
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Year Ended February
29,
2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in)
operating
activities
|
$
|
397,785
|
$
|
115,791
|
$
|
(173,269
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
340,307
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Purchases
of property, plant and
equipment
|
(25,063
|
)
|
(19,982
|
)
|
(60,049
|
)
|
-
|
(105,094
|
)
|
|||||||
Purchases
of businesses, net of
cash
acquired
|
-
|
(1,069,470
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(1,069,470
|
)
|
|||||||||
Payment
of accrued earn-out amount
|
-
|
(2,035
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(2,035
|
)
|
|||||||||
Investment
in equity method investee
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from sales of assets
|
-
|
11,396
|
2,053
|
-
|
13,449
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from sales of equity
method
investments
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from sales
of businesses
|
-
|
-
|
3,814
|
-
|
3,814
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of marketable
equity
securities
|
-
|
-
|
849
|
-
|
849
|
|||||||||||
Other
investing activities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(25,063
|
)
|
(1,080,091
|
)
|
(53,333
|
)
|
-
|
(1,158,487
|
)
|
101
Parent
Company
|
Subsidiary
Guarantors
|
Subsidiary
Nonguarantors
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Principal
payments of long-term debt
|
(885,359
|
)
|
(23,394
|
)
|
(373,521
|
)
|
-
|
(1,282,274
|
)
|
|||||||
Payment
of preferred stock dividends
|
(3,295
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(3,295
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
(repayment of) proceeds from
notes
payable
|
(2,000
|
)
|
(1,400
|
)
|
2,287
|
-
|
(1,113
|
)
|
||||||||
Exercise
of employee stock options
|
36,017
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
36,017
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of long-term
debt
|
1,600,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,600,000
|
|||||||||||
Proceeds
from employee stock
purchases
|
3,481
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,481
|
|||||||||||
Payment
of issuance costs of
long-term
debt
|
(33,748
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(33,748
|
)
|
|||||||||
Proceeds
from equity offerings,
net
of fees
|
426,086
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
426,086
|
|||||||||||
Intercompany
financing activities, net
|
(1,474,100
|
)
|
776,442
|
697,658
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by
financing
activities
|
(332,918
|
)
|
751,648
|
326,424
|
-
|
745,154
|
||||||||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on
cash
and cash investments
|
(40,182
|
)
|
216,068
|
(79,534
|
)
|
-
|
96,352
|
|||||||||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and
cash
investments
|
(378
|
)
|
3,416
|
20,288
|
-
|
23,326
|
||||||||||
Cash
and cash investments, beginning
of
year
|
1,426
|
1,248
|
11,136
|
-
|
13,810
|
|||||||||||
Cash
and cash investments, end of year
|
$
|
1,048
|
$
|
4,664
|
$
|
31,424
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
37,136
|
22. BUSINESS
SEGMENT INFORMATION:
The
Company reports its operating results in three segments: Constellation Wines
(branded wine, and U.K. wholesale and other), Constellation Beers and Spirits
(imported beers and distilled spirits) and Corporate Operations and Other.
Amounts included in the Corporate Operations and Other segment consist of
general corporate administration and finance expenses. These amounts include
costs of executive management, corporate development, corporate finance,
human
resources, internal audit, investor relations, legal, public relations, global
information technology and global strategic sourcing. Any costs incurred
at the
corporate office that are applicable to the segments are allocated to the
appropriate segment. The amounts included in the Corporate Operations and
Other
segment are general costs that are applicable to the consolidated group and
are
therefore not allocated to the other reportable segments. All costs reported
within the Corporate Operations and Other segment are not included in the
chief
operating decision maker’s evaluation of the operating income performance of the
other operating segments.
The
business segments reflect how the Company’s operations are being managed, how
operating performance within the Company is being evaluated by senior management
and the structure of its internal financial reporting. In addition, the Company
excludes acquisition-related integration costs, restructuring and related
charges and unusual items that affect comparability from its definition of
operating income for segment purposes.
102
For
the
year ended February 28, 2006, acquisition-related integration costs,
restructuring and related charges and unusual costs consist of restructuring
and
related charges associated primarily with the Fiscal 2006 Plan and the Robert
Mondavi Plan of $29.3 million; the flow through of adverse grape cost (as
described below) and acquisition-related integration costs associated primarily
with the Robert Mondavi acquisition of $23.0 million and $16.8 million,
respectively; accelerated depreciation costs in connection with the Fiscal
2006
Plan of $13.4 million; the flow through of inventory step-up of $7.9 million
associated primarily with the Robert Mondavi acquisition; the write-off of
due
diligence costs associated with the Company’s evaluation of a potential offer
for Allied Domecq of $3.4 million; and other costs associated with the Fiscal
2006 Plan of $0.1 million. Adverse grape cost represents the amount of
historical inventory cost on Robert Mondavi’s balance sheet that exceeds the
Company’s estimated ongoing grape cost and is primarily due to the purchase of
grapes by Robert Mondavi prior to the acquisition date at above-market prices
as
required under the terms of their existing grape purchase contracts. For
the
year ended February 28, 2005, acquisition-related integration costs,
restructuring and related charges and unusual costs consist of financing
costs
associated
with
the redemption of the Company’s Senior Subordinated Notes (as defined in Note 9)
and the repayment
of the
Company’s prior senior credit facility of $31.7 million; the flow through of
adverse grape cost and acquisition-related integration costs associated with
the
Robert Mondavi acquisition of $9.8 million and $9.4 million, respectively;
restructuring and related charges of $7.6 million; and the flow through of
inventory step-up associated with the Hardy Acquisition and the Robert Mondavi
acquisition of $6.4 million; partially offset by a net gain on the sale of
non-strategic assets and a gain related to the receipt of a payment associated
with the termination of a previously announced potential fine wine joint
venture
of $6.1 million. For the year ended February 29, 2004, acquisition-related
integration costs, restructuring and related charges and unusual costs consist
of the flow through of inventory step-up and financing costs associated with
the
Hardy Acquisition of $22.5 million and $11.6 million, respectively; and
restructuring and related charges of $47.9 million, including a write-down
of
commodity concentrate inventory of $16.8 million, partially offset by the
relief
from certain excise tax, duty and other costs incurred in prior years of
$10.4
million.
The
Company evaluates performance based on operating income of the respective
business units. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
described for the Company in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
in
Note 1 and include the recently adopted accounting pronouncements described
in
Note 2. Transactions between segments consist mainly of sales of products
and
are accounted for at cost plus an applicable margin.
Segment
information is as follows:
For
the Years Ended
|
||||||||||
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
February
29,
2004
|
||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||
Constellation
Wines:
|
||||||||||
Net
sales:
|
||||||||||
Branded
wine
|
$
|
2,263,369
|
$
|
1,830,808
|
$
|
1,549,750
|
||||
Wholesale
and other
|
972,051
|
1,020,600
|
846,306
|
|||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
3,235,420
|
$
|
2,851,408
|
$
|
2,396,056
|
||||
Segment
operating income
|
$
|
530,388
|
$
|
406,562
|
$
|
348,132
|
||||
Equity
in earnings of equity method investees
|
$
|
825
|
$
|
1,753
|
$
|
542
|
||||
Long-lived
assets
|
$
|
1,322,136
|
$
|
1,498,124
|
$
|
1,004,906
|
||||
Investment
in equity method investees
|
$
|
146,639
|
$
|
259,181
|
$
|
8,412
|
||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
6,510,280
|
$
|
6,941,068
|
$
|
4,789,199
|
||||
Capital
expenditures
|
$
|
118,615
|
$
|
109,240
|
$
|
94,147
|
||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
$
|
110,486
|
$
|
83,744
|
$
|
73,046
|
103
For
the Years Ended
|
||||||||||
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
February
29,
2004
|
||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||
Constellation
Beers and Spirits:
|
||||||||||
Net
sales:
|
||||||||||
Imported
beers
|
$
|
1,043,483
|
$
|
922,947
|
$
|
862,637
|
||||
Spirits
|
324,545
|
313,283
|
284,551
|
|||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
1,368,028
|
$
|
1,236,230
|
$
|
1,147,188
|
||||
Segment
operating income
|
$
|
292,572
|
$
|
276,109
|
$
|
252,533
|
||||
Long-lived
assets
|
$
|
90,527
|
$
|
83,548
|
$
|
80,388
|
||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
833,627
|
$
|
790,457
|
$
|
718,380
|
||||
Capital
expenditures
|
$
|
11,536
|
$
|
6,524
|
$
|
7,497
|
||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
$
|
9,760
|
$
|
10,590
|
$
|
9,491
|
||||
Corporate
Operations and Other:
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Segment
operating loss
|
$
|
(63,001
|
)
|
$
|
(55,980
|
)
|
$
|
(41,717
|
)
|
|
Long-lived
assets
|
$
|
12,635
|
$
|
14,695
|
$
|
12,068
|
||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
56,647
|
$
|
72,647
|
$
|
51,094
|
||||
Capital
expenditures
|
$
|
2,347
|
$
|
3,900
|
$
|
3,450
|
||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
$
|
7,852
|
$
|
9,321
|
$
|
19,417
|
||||
Acquisition-Related
Integration
Costs,
Restructuring and Related
Charges
and Net Unusual Costs:
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
9,185
|
||||
Operating
loss
|
$
|
(93,844
|
)
|
$
|
(58,795
|
)
|
$
|
(71,591
|
)
|
|
Consolidated:
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
4,603,448
|
$
|
4,087,638
|
$
|
3,552,429
|
||||
Operating
income
|
$
|
666,115
|
$
|
567,896
|
$
|
487,357
|
||||
Equity
in earnings of equity method
investees
|
$
|
825
|
$
|
1,753
|
$
|
542
|
||||
Long-lived
assets
|
$
|
1,425,298
|
$
|
1,596,367
|
$
|
1,097,362
|
||||
Investment
in equity method
investees
|
$
|
146,639
|
$
|
259,181
|
$
|
8,412
|
||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
7,400,554
|
$
|
7,804,172
|
$
|
5,558,673
|
||||
Capital
expenditures
|
$
|
132,498
|
$
|
119,664
|
$
|
105,094
|
||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
$
|
128,098
|
$
|
103,655
|
$
|
101,954
|
The
Company’s areas of operations are principally in the United States. Operations
outside the United States are primarily in the United Kingdom and Australia
and
are included within the Constellation Wines segment. Revenues are attributed
to
countries based on the location of the selling company.
104
Geographic
data is as follows:
For
the Years Ended
|
||||||||||
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
February
29,
2004
|
||||||||
Net
Sales
|
||||||||||
United
States
|
$
|
2,823,345
|
$
|
2,334,854
|
$
|
2,132,357
|
||||
Non-U.S.
|
1,780,103
|
1,752,784
|
1,420,072
|
|||||||
Total
|
$
|
4,603,448
|
$
|
4,087,638
|
$
|
3,552,429
|
||||
Significant
non-U.S. revenue sources include:
|
||||||||||
United
Kingdom
|
$
|
1,357,887
|
$
|
1,374,775
|
$
|
1,128,022
|
||||
Australia
/ New Zealand
|
319,283
|
314,704
|
238,229
|
|||||||
Other
|
102,933
|
63,305
|
53,821
|
|||||||
Total
|
$
|
1,780,103
|
$
|
1,752,784
|
$
|
1,420,072
|
February
28,
2006
|
February
28,
2005
|
||||||
Long-lived
assets
|
|||||||
United
States
|
$
|
765,200
|
$
|
922,161
|
|||
Non-U.S.
|
660,098
|
674,206
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
1,425,298
|
$
|
1,596,367
|
|||
Significant
non-U.S. long-lived assets include:
|
|||||||
Australia
/ New Zealand
|
$
|
431,627
|
$
|
437,157
|
|||
United
Kingdom
|
160,733
|
175,638
|
|||||
Other
|
67,738
|
61,411
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
660,098
|
$
|
674,206
|
23. ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS NOT YET ADOPTED:
In
November 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
151 (“SFAS No. 151”), “Inventory Costs - an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.”
SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43 (“ARB
No. 43”), “Restatement and Revision of Accounting Research Bulletins,” Chapter
4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle
facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage).
SFAS
No. 151 requires that those items be recognized as current period charges.
In
addition, SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overheads
to
the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. As required, the Company adopted SFAS No. 151 on March 1, 2006.
The
adoption of SFAS No. 151 did not have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
105
In
December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
123 (revised 2004) (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS No. 123(R)
replaces Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (“SFAS No. 123”),
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supersedes Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25 (“APB Opinion No. 25”), “Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees.” SFAS No. 123(R) requires the cost resulting from all share-based
payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. In addition,
SFAS No. 123(R) establishes fair value as the measurement objective in
accounting for share-based payment arrangements and requires all entities
to
apply a grant date fair-value-based measurement method in accounting for
share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123(R) also amends Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 95 (“SFAS No. 95”), “Statement of Cash
Flows,” to require that excess tax benefits be reported as a financing cash
inflow rather than as a reduction of taxes paid. SFAS No. 123(R) applies
to all
awards granted, modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the required effective
date (see below). In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)
staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB No. 107”), “Share-Based
Payment,” to express the views of the staff regarding the interaction between
SFAS No. 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations and to provide the
staff’s
views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public
companies. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) as of March 1, 2006, using
the
modified prospective application. This application requires compensation
cost to
be recognized on or after the required effective date for the portion of
outstanding awards for which the requisite service has not yet been rendered
based on the grant date fair value of those awards as calculated under SFAS
No.
123 for either recognition or pro forma disclosures. As of March 1, 2006,
the
unrecognized compensation expense associated with the remaining portion of
the
unvested outstanding awards is not material. In addition, the Company estimates
stock-based compensation expense for options to be granted for the year ended
February 28, 2007, to approximate $8.5 million, excluding any options granted
or
which may be granted in connection with the pending acquisition of Vincor
(see Note 24).
In
May
2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154
(“SFAS
No. 154”), “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - a replacement of APB
Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.” SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements
for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle.
SFAS
No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle and requires
retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in
accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the
period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of changing to the new
accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 requires that a change in depreciation,
amortization, or depletion method for long-lived, nonfinancial assets be
accounted for as a change of estimate effected by a change in accounting
principle. SFAS No. 154 also carries forward without change the guidance
in APB
Opinion No. 20 with respect to accounting for changes in accounting estimates,
changes in the reporting unit and correction of an error in previously issued
financial statements. As required, the Company adopted SFAS No. 154 on March
1,
2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 154 did not have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
24. SUBSEQUENT
EVENT:
On
April
2, 2006, the Company entered into an arrangement agreement (the “Arrangement
Agreement”) with Vincor International Inc. (“Vincor”) pursuant to which, subject
to satisfaction of certain conditions, the Company will acquire all of the
issued and outstanding common shares of Vincor. Vincor is the world’s eighth
largest producer and distributor of wine and related products by revenue
based
in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, and is Canada’s largest producer and marketer
of wine. Vincor is also one of the largest wine importers, marketers and
distributors in the U.K. The pending acquisition of Vincor supports the
Company’s strategy of strengthening the breadth of its portfolio across price
segments and geographic markets to capitalize on the overall growth in the
wine
industry.
106
The
Arrangement Agreement provides for Vincor shareholders to receive in cash
Cdn$36.50 per common share. Total consideration to be paid in cash to the
Vincor
shareholders is expected to be approximately Cdn$1.2 billion. In addition,
the
Company expects to pay certain obligations of Vincor, including indebtedness
outstanding under its bank facility and secured notes. In April 2006, the
Company entered into a foreign currency forward contract in connection with
the
pending acquisition of Vincor to fix the U.S. dollar cost of the
acquisition and the payment of certain outstanding indebtedness. The foreign
currency forward contract is for the purchase of Cdn$1.4 billion at a rate
of Cdn$1.149 to U.S.$1.00. The consideration to be paid to the shareholders
and
the amount needed to repay outstanding indebtedness of Vincor is expected
to be financed with borrowings under an amended and restated senior credit
facility. The Company currently expects to complete the acquisition of
Vincor in early June 2006.
In
accordance with the purchase method of accounting, the acquired net assets
will
be recorded at fair value as of the date of the acquisition. The results
of
operations of Vincor will be reported in the Constellation Wines segment
and
will be included in the Consolidated Statements of Income beginning on the
date
of acquisition.
25. SELECTED
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED):
A
summary
of selected quarterly financial information is as follows:
QUARTER
ENDED
|
||||||||||||||||
Fiscal
2006
|
May
31,
2005
|
August
31,
2005
|
November
30,
2005
|
February
28,
2006
|
Full
Year
|
|||||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
1,096,535
|
$
|
1,191,959
|
$
|
1,267,087
|
$
|
1,047,867
|
$
|
4,603,448
|
||||||
Gross
profit
|
$
|
306,006
|
$
|
348,000
|
$
|
384,221
|
$
|
286,362
|
$
|
1,324,589
|
||||||
Net
income(1)
|
$
|
75,699
|
$
|
82,420
|
$
|
108,961
|
$
|
58,182
|
$
|
325,262
|
||||||
Earnings
per common share(2):
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
- Class A Common Stock
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
0.37
|
$
|
0.49
|
$
|
0.25
|
$
|
1.44
|
||||||
Basic
- Class B Common Stock
|
$
|
0.31
|
$
|
0.33
|
$
|
0.44
|
$
|
0.23
|
$
|
1.31
|
||||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.32
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
0.46
|
$
|
0.24
|
$
|
1.36
|
QUARTER
ENDED
|
||||||||||||||||
Fiscal
2005
|
May
31,
2004
|
August
31,
2004
|
November
30,
2004
|
February
28,
2005
|
Full
Year
|
|||||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
927,305
|
$
|
1,036,941
|
$
|
1,085,711
|
$
|
1,037,681
|
$
|
4,087,638
|
||||||
Gross
profit
|
$
|
250,462
|
$
|
289,683
|
$
|
313,664
|
$
|
286,780
|
$
|
1,140,589
|
||||||
Net
income(3)
|
$
|
51,329
|
$
|
80,614
|
$
|
96,893
|
$
|
47,628
|
$
|
276,464
|
||||||
Earnings
per common share(2):
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
- Class A Common Stock
|
$
|
0.23
|
$
|
0.37
|
$
|
0.44
|
$
|
0.21
|
$
|
1.25
|
||||||
Basic
- Class B Common Stock
|
$
|
0.21
|
$
|
0.33
|
$
|
0.40
|
$
|
0.19
|
$
|
1.14
|
||||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.22
|
$
|
0.35
|
$
|
0.42
|
$
|
0.20
|
$
|
1.19
|
(1)
|
In
Fiscal 2006, the Company recorded acquisition-related integration
costs,
restructuring and related charges and unusual costs consisting
of
restructuring and related charges associated primarily with the
Fiscal
2006 Plan and the Robert Mondavi Plan; the flow through of adverse
grape
cost and acquisition-related integration costs associated primarily
with
the Robert Mondavi acquisition; the flow through of inventory step-up
associated with the Robert Mondavi acquisition and certain equity
method
investments; accelerated depreciation costs in connection with
the Fiscal
2006 Plan; the write-off of due diligence costs associated with
the
Company’s evaluation of a potential offer for Allied Domecq; other
worldwide wines reorganization costs in connection with the Fiscal
2006
Plan; and an income tax adjustment in connection with the reversal
of an
income tax accrual related to the completion of various income
tax
examinations. The following table identifies these items, net of
income
taxes, by quarter and in the aggregate for Fiscal
2006:
|
107
QUARTER
ENDED
|
||||||||||||||||
Fiscal
2006
|
May
31,
2005
|
August
31,
2005
|
November
30,
2005
|
February
28,
2006
|
Full
Year
|
|||||||||||
(in
thousands, net of tax)
|
||||||||||||||||
Restructuring
and related charges
|
$
|
1,149
|
$
|
1,468
|
$
|
2,585
|
$
|
15,485
|
$
|
20,687
|
||||||
Flow
through of adverse grape cost
|
4,595
|
4,165
|
3,771
|
2,102
|
14,633
|
|||||||||||
Acquisition-related
integration costs
|
3,934
|
5,075
|
985
|
668
|
10,662
|
|||||||||||
Flow
through of inventory step-up
|
2,071
|
2,463
|
3,135
|
5,845
|
13,514
|
|||||||||||
Accelerated
depreciation
|
-
|
-
|
4,397
|
4,566
|
8,963
|
|||||||||||
Allied
Domecq due diligence costs
|
-
|
2,460
|
(233
|
)
|
-
|
2,227
|
||||||||||
Other
worldwide wines reorganization costs
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
54
|
54
|
|||||||||||
Income
tax adjustment
|
(16,208
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(16,208
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
acquisition-related integration
costs,
restructuring
and related
charges
and unusual
costs
|
$
|
(4,459
|
)
|
$
|
15,631
|
$
|
14,640
|
$
|
28,720
|
$
|
54,532
|
(2)
|
The
sum of the quarterly earnings per common share in Fiscal 2006 and
Fiscal
2005 may not equal the total computed for the respective years
as the
earnings per common share are computed independently for each of
the
quarters presented and for the full
year.
|
(3)
|
In
Fiscal 2005, the Company recorded acquisition-related integration
costs,
restructuring and related charges and unusual costs consisting
of
financing costs associated with the redemption of senior subordinated
notes and the repayment of the Company’s prior senior credit facility; the
flow through of adverse grape cost and acquisition-related integration
costs associated with the Robert Mondavi acquisition; restructuring
and
related charges resulting primarily from (i) the realignment of
business
operations in the Constellation Wines segment and (ii) the Robert
Mondavi
acquisition; the flow through of inventory step-up associated with
the
Hardy Acquisition and the Robert Mondavi acquisition; and other,
which
include net gains from the sale of non-strategic assets and the
receipt of
a payment associated with the termination of a previously announced
potential fine wine joint venture. The following table identifies
these
items, net of income taxes, by quarter and in the aggregate for
Fiscal
2005:
|
QUARTER
ENDED
|
||||||||||||||||
Fiscal
2005
|
May
31,
2004
|
August
31,
2004
|
November
30,
2004
|
February
28,
2005
|
Full
Year
|
|||||||||||
(in
thousands, net of tax)
|
||||||||||||||||
Financing
costs
|
$
|
6,601
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
13,684
|
$
|
20,285
|
||||||
Flow
through of adverse grape cost
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6,240
|
6,240
|
|||||||||||
Acquisition-related
integration costs
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6,029
|
6,029
|
|||||||||||
Restructuring
and related charges
|
1,032
|
748
|
1,052
|
2,018
|
4,850
|
|||||||||||
Flow
through of inventory step-up
|
829
|
622
|
1,210
|
1,479
|
4,140
|
|||||||||||
Other
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(3,916
|
)
|
(3,916
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
acquisition-related integration
costs,
restructuring
and related
charges
and unusual
costs
|
$
|
8,462
|
$
|
1,370
|
$
|
2,262
|
$
|
25,534
|
$
|
37,628
|
108
Item
9. Changes
in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
Not
Applicable.
Item
9A. Controls
and Procedures
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
The
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer have
concluded, based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by
this
report, that the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) are effective
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the
Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
(a) |
See
page 53 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for Management’s Annual Report
on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, which is incorporated
herein
by reference.
|
(b) |
See
page 51 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the attestation report
of
KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm,
which is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(c) |
In
connection with the foregoing evaluation by the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, no changes were identified
in the
Company’s “internal control over financial reporting” (as defined in the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that
occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2006 (the
Company’s fourth fiscal quarter) that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting.
|
Item
9B. Other
Information
Not
Applicable.
PART
III
Item
10. Directors
and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The
information required by this Item (except for the information regarding
executive officers required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K which is included
in
Part I hereof in accordance with General Instruction G(3)) is incorporated
herein by reference to the Company’s proxy statement to be issued in connection
with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company which is expected to
be
held on July 27, 2006, under those sections of the proxy statement to be titled
“Election of Directors,” “The Board of Directors and Committees of the Board”
and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” which proxy
statement will be filed within 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal
year.
109
The
Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its chief executive officer
and its senior financial officers. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and
Senior Financial Executive Code of Ethics is located on the Company’s internet
website at http://www.cbrands.com/CBI/investors.htm. Amendments to, and waivers
granted under, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial
Executive Code of Ethics, if any, will be posted to the Company’s website as
well. The Company will provide to anyone, without charge, upon request, a copy
of such Code of Ethics. Such requests should be directed in writing to Investor
Relations Department, Constellation Brands, Inc., 370 Woodcliff Drive, Suite
300, Fairport, New York 14450 or by telephoning the Company’s Investor Center at
1-888-922-2150.
Item
11. Executive
Compensation
The
information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the
Company’s proxy statement to be issued in connection with the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of the Company which is expected to be held on July 27, 2006,
under
that section of the proxy statement to be titled “Executive Compensation” and
that caption to be titled “Director Compensation” under “Election of Directors,”
which proxy statement will be filed within 120 days after the end of the
Company’s fiscal year.
Item
12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
The
information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the
Company’s proxy statement to be issued in connection with the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of the Company which is expected to be held on July 27, 2006,
under
those sections of the proxy statement to be titled “Beneficial Ownership” and
“Stock Ownership of Management,”
which
proxy statement will be filed within 120 days after the end of the Company’s
fiscal year.
Additional information required by this item is as follows:
Securities
Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The
following table sets forth information with respect to the Company’s
compensation plans under which its equity securities may be issued, as of
February 28, 2006. The equity compensation plans approved by security holders
include the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, Incentive Stock Option
Plan and 1989 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Company’s UK Sharesave Scheme
(the “UK Plan”) is an equity compensation plan not approved by security holders.
Under the UK Plan, 2,000,000 shares of Class A Stock may be issued to eligible
United Kingdom employees and directors of the Company in offerings that
typically extend from three to five years. Under the terms of the UK Plan,
participants may purchase shares of Class A Stock at the end of the offering
period through payroll deductions made during the offering period. The payroll
deductions are kept in interest bearing accounts until the participant either
exercises the option at the end of the offering or withdraws from the offering.
The exercise price for each offering is fixed at the beginning of the offering
by the committee administering the plan and may be no less than 80% of the
closing price of the stock on the day the exercise price is fixed. If a
participant ceases to be employed by the Company, that participant may exercise
the option during a period of time specified in the UK Plan or may withdraw
from
the offering. During the year ended February 28, 2006, an aggregate of 92,622
shares were issued pursuant to the UK Plan.
110
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
|
Plan
Category
|
Number
of securities
to
be issued upon
exercise
of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
|
Weighted-average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
|
Number
of securities
remaining
available for
future
issuance under
equity
compensation plans
(excluding
securities
reflected
in column (a))
|
Equity
compensation
plans
approved by
security
holders
|
23,652,958
|
$14.43
|
32,152,816
|
Equity
compensation
plans
not approved by
security
holders (1)
|
-
|
-
|
1,776,116
|
Total
|
23,652,958
|
$14.43
|
33,928,932
|
______________________
(1)
There is
currently one ongoing offering under the UK Plan. The exercise price for
shares that may be purchased at the end of this offering is $7.105.
The number of options outstanding that represent the right to purchase shares
at
the end of the offering is not determinable because the exchange rate is
not
known and because the Company cannot predict the level of participation by
employees during the remaining term of the offering.
Item
13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related
Transactions
|
The
information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to
the
Company’s proxy statement to be issued in connection with the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of the Company which is expected to be held on July 27, 2006,
under
that section of the proxy statement to be titled “Executive Compensation,” which
proxy statement will be filed within 120 days after the end of the Company’s
fiscal year.
Item
14. Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
The
information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to
the
Company’s proxy statement to be issued in connection with the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of the Company which is expected to be held on July 27, 2006,
under
the relevant portion of the sections of the proxy statement to be titled
“Audit
Committee Report” and “Selection of Independent Public
Accountants.”
111
PART
IV
|
|||
Item
15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
||
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
||
The
following consolidated financial statements of the Company are
submitted
herewith:
|
|||
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - KPMG
LLP
|
|||
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - KPMG
LLP
|
|||
Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
|
|||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets - February 28, 2006, and February 28,
2005
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Income for the years ended February 28, 2006, February
28,
2005, and February 29, 2004
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended February
28, 2006, February 28, 2005, and February 29, 2004
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended February 28, 2006,
February
28, 2005, and February 29, 2004
|
|||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|||
2.
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
|
||
Schedules
are not submitted because they are not applicable or not required
under
Regulation S-X or because the required information is included
in the
financial statements or notes thereto.
|
|||
3.
|
Exhibits
required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
|
||
For
the exhibits that are filed herewith or incorporated herein by
reference,
see the Index to Exhibits located on Page 114 of this Report. The
Index to Exhibits is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
112
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf
by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated:
May 1, 2006
|
CONSTELLATION
BRANDS, INC.
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Richard Sands
|
|
Richard
Sands, Chairman of the Board and
Chief
Executive Officer
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has
been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in
the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/
Richard Sands
|
/s/
Thomas S. Summer
|
|
Richard
Sands, Director, Chairman of the
Board
and Chief Executive Officer
(principal
executive officer)
Dated:
May 1, 2006
|
Thomas
S. Summer, Executive Vice
President
and Chief Financial Officer
(principal
financial officer and
principal
accounting officer)
Dated:
May 1, 2006
|
|
/s/
Robert Sands
|
/s/
Barry A. Fromberg
|
|
Robert
Sands, Director
Dated:
May 1, 2006
|
Barry
A. Fromberg, Director
Dated:
May 1, 2006
|
|
/s/
James A. Locke III
|
/s/
Jeananne K. Hauswald
|
|
James
A. Locke III, Director
Dated:
May 1, 2006
|
Jeananne
K. Hauswald, Director
Dated:
May 1, 2006
|
|
/s/
Paul L. Smith
|
/s/
Thomas C. McDermott
|
|
Paul
L. Smith, Director
Dated:
May 1, 2006
|
Thomas
C. McDermott, Director
Dated:
May 1, 2006
|
113
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
|
||
Exhibit
No.
|
||
2.1
|
Implementation
Deed dated 17 January 2003 between Constellation Brands, Inc. and
BRL
Hardy Limited (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K dated January 21, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
2.2
|
Transaction
Compensation Agreement dated 17 January 2003 between Constellation
Brands,
Inc. and BRL Hardy Limited (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated January 21, 2003 and incorporated herein
by
reference).
|
|
2.3
|
No
Solicitation Agreement dated 13 January 2003 between Constellation
Brands,
Inc. and BRL Hardy Limited (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated January 21, 2003 and incorporated herein
by
reference).
|
|
2.4
|
Backstop
Fee Agreement dated 13 January 2003 between Constellation Brands,
Inc. and
BRL Hardy Limited (filed as Exhibit 99.4 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K dated January 21, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
2.5
|
Letter
Agreement dated 6 February 2003 between Constellation Brands, Inc.
and BRL
Hardy Limited (filed as Exhibit 2.5 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K dated March 27, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
2.6
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 3, 2004, by and among
Constellation Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation, RMD Acquisition
Corp.,
a California corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Constellation
Brands, Inc., and The Robert Mondavi Corporation, a California
corporation
(filed as Exhibit 2.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2004 and incorporated herein
by
reference).
|
|
2.7
|
Support
Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2004, by and among Constellation
Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation and certain shareholders of
The
Robert Mondavi Corporation (filed as Exhibit 2.7 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November
30,
2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
2.8
|
Arrangement
Agreement dated April 2, 2006 by and among Constellation Brands,
Inc.,
Constellation Canada Holdings Limited, and Vincor International
Inc.
(filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
April 2, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
3.1
|
Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1
to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
August 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
114
3.2
|
Amendment
to Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.2
to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
August 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
3.3
|
Certificate
of Designations of 5.75% Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred
Stock of
the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August
31, 2005
and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
3.4
|
By-Laws
of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2002 and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
|
4.1
|
Indenture,
dated as of February 25, 1999, among the Company, as issuer, certain
principal subsidiaries, as Guarantors, and BNY Midwest Trust Company
(successor Trustee to Harris Trust and Savings Bank), as Trustee
(filed as
Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February
25, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).#
|
|
4.2
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 1, with respect to 8 1/2% Senior Subordinated Notes
due
2009, dated as of February 25, 1999, by and among the Company,
as Issuer,
certain principal subsidiaries, as Guarantors, and BNY Midwest
Trust
Company (successor Trustee to Harris Trust and Savings Bank), as
Trustee
(filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
February 25, 1999 and incorporated herein by
reference).#
|
|
4.3
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 2, with respect to 8 5/8% Senior Notes due 2006,
dated as of
August 4, 1999, by and among the Company, as Issuer, certain principal
subsidiaries, as Guarantors, and BNY Midwest Trust Company (successor
Trustee to Harris Trust and Savings Bank), as Trustee (filed as
Exhibit
4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 28, 1999 and
incorporated herein by reference).#
|
|
4.4
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 3, dated as of August 6, 1999, by and among the Company,
Canandaigua B.V., Barton Canada, Ltd., Simi Winery, Inc., Franciscan
Vineyards, Inc., Allberry, Inc., M.J. Lewis Corp., Cloud Peak Corporation,
Mt. Veeder Corporation, SCV-EPI Vineyards, Inc., and BNY Midwest
Trust
Company (successor Trustee to Harris Trust and Savings Bank), as
Trustee
(filed as Exhibit 4.20 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 1999 and incorporated herein
by
reference).#
|
|
4.5
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 4, with respect to 8 1/2% Senior Notes due 2009,
dated as of
May 15, 2000, by and among the Company, as Issuer, certain principal
subsidiaries, as Guarantors, and BNY Midwest Trust Company (successor
Trustee to Harris Trust and Savings Bank), as Trustee (filed as
Exhibit
4.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
February 29, 2000 and incorporated herein by
reference).#
|
115
4.6
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 5, dated as of September 14, 2000, by and among the
Company,
as Issuer, certain principal subsidiaries, as Guarantors, and BNY
Midwest
Trust Company (successor Trustee to The Bank of New York), as Trustee
(filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2000 and incorporated herein
by
reference).#
|
|
4.7
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 6, dated as of August 21, 2001, among the Company,
Ravenswood Winery, Inc. and BNY Midwest Trust Company (successor
trustee
to Harris Trust and Savings Bank and The Bank of New York, as applicable),
as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement
on Form S-3 (Pre-effective Amendment No. 1) (Registration No. 333-63480)
and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
4.8
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 7, dated as of January 23, 2002, by and among the
Company,
as Issuer, certain principal subsidiaries, as Guarantors, and BNY
Midwest
Trust Company, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated January 17, 2002 and incorporated herein
by
reference).
|
|
4.9
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 8, dated as of March 27, 2003, by and among the Company,
CBI
Australia Holdings Pty Limited (ACN 103 359 299), Constellation
Australia
Pty Limited (ACN 103 362 232) and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as
Trustee
(filed as
Exhibit 4.9 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended February 28, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
4.10
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 9, dated as of July 8, 2004, by and among the Company,
BRL
Hardy Investments (USA) Inc., BRL Hardy (USA) Inc., Pacific Wine
Partners
LLC, Nobilo Holdings, and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as Trustee
(filed as
Exhibit 4.10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended August 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
4.11
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 10, dated as of September 13, 2004, by and among
the
Company, Constellation Trading, Inc., and BNY Midwest Trust Company,
as
Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.11 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004 and incorporated
herein
by reference).
|
|
4.12
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 11, dated as of December 22, 2004, by and among the
Company,
The Robert Mondavi Corporation, R.M.E. Inc., Robert Mondavi Winery,
Robert
Mondavi Investments, Robert Mondavi Affilates d/b/a Vichon Winery
and
Robert Mondavi Properties, Inc., and BNY Midwest Trust Company,
as Trustee
(filed as
Exhibit 4.12 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended November 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
116
4.13
|
Indenture,
with respect to 8 1/2% Senior Notes due 2009, dated as of November
17,
1999, among the Company, as Issuer, certain principal subsidiaries,
as
Guarantors, and BNY Midwest Trust Company (successor to Harris
Trust and
Savings Bank), as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-94369)
and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
4.14
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 1, dated as of August 21, 2001, among the Company,
Ravenswood Winery, Inc. and BNY Midwest Trust Company (successor
to Harris
Trust and Savings Bank), as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the
Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August
31, 2001
and incorporated herein by reference).#
|
|
4.15
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 2, dated as of March 27, 2003, among the Company,
CBI
Australia Holdings Pty Limited (ACN 103 359 299), Constellation
Australia
Pty Limited (ACN 103 362 232) and BNY Midwest Trust Company (successor
to
Harris Trust and Savings Bank), as Trustee (filed as
Exhibit 4.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended February 28, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
4.16
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 3, dated as of July 8, 2004, by and among the Company,
BRL
Hardy Investments (USA) Inc., BRL Hardy (USA) Inc., Pacific Wine
Partners
LLC, Nobilo Holdings, and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as Trustee
(filed as
Exhibit 4.15 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended August 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
4.17
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 4, dated as of September 13, 2004, by and among the
Company,
Constellation Trading, Inc., and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as
Trustee
(filed as Exhibit 4.16 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004 and incorporated herein
by
reference).
|
|
4.18
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 5, dated as of December 22, 2004, by and among the
Company,
The Robert Mondavi Corporation, R.M.E. Inc., Robert Mondavi Winery,
Robert
Mondavi Investments, Robert Mondavi Affilates d/b/a Vichon Winery
and
Robert Mondavi Properties, Inc., and BNY Midwest Trust Company,
as Trustee
(filed as
Exhibit 4.18 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended November 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
4.19
|
Indenture,
with respect to 8% Senior Notes due 2008, dated as of February
21, 2001,
by and among the Company, as Issuer, certain principal subsidiaries,
as
Guarantors and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as Trustee (filed as
Exhibit 4.1
to the Company’s Registration Statement filed on Form S-4 (Registration
No. 333-60720) and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
117
4.20
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 1, dated as of August 21, 2001, among the Company,
Ravenswood Winery, Inc. and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as Trustee
(filed
as Exhibit 4.7 to the Company’s Pre-effective Amendment No. 1 to its
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-63480)
and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
4.21
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 2, dated as of March 27, 2003, among the Company,
CBI
Australia Holdings Pty Limited (ACN 103 359 299), Constellation
Australia
Pty Limited (ACN 103 362 232) and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as
Trustee
(filed as
Exhibit 4.21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended February 28, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
4.22
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 3, dated as of July 8, 2004, by and among the Company,
BRL
Hardy Investments (USA) Inc., BRL Hardy (USA) Inc., Pacific Wine
Partners
LLC, Nobilo Holdings, and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as Trustee
(filed as
Exhibit 4.20 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended August 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
4.23
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 4, dated as of September 13, 2004, by and among the
Company,
Constellation Trading, Inc., and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as
Trustee
(filed as Exhibit 4.21 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004 and incorporated herein
by
reference).
|
|
4.24
|
Supplemental
Indenture No. 5, dated as of December 22, 2004, by and among the
Company,
The Robert Mondavi Corporation, R.M.E. Inc., Robert Mondavi Winery,
Robert
Mondavi Investments, Robert Mondavi Affilates d/b/a Vichon Winery
and
Robert Mondavi Properties, Inc., and BNY Midwest Trust Company,
as Trustee
(filed as
Exhibit 4.24 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended November 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
4.25
|
Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2003, among
the
Company and certain of its subsidiaries, the lenders named therein,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent, and JPMorgan Europe
Limited,
as London Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K dated March 27, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
4.26
|
Amendment
No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
July 18,
2003, among the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.17 to the
Company’s Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2003
and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
4.27
|
Second
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 31,
2003, among
the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, the lenders named
therein,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent, and J.P. Morgan Europe
Limited, as London Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.18 to the Company’s Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2003 and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
118
4.28
|
Amendment
No. 1, dated as of February 10, 2004, to the Second Amended and
Restated
Credit Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2003, among the Company,
the
Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto
and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit
4.25 to the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February
29, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
4.29
|
Guarantee
Assumption Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2004, by BRL Hardy Investments
(USA) Inc., BRL Hardy (USA) Inc., Pacific Wine Partners LLC and
Nobilo
Holdings in favor of JP Morgan Chase Bank, as administrative agent,
pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated
as of
October 31, 2003 (as modified and supplemented and in effect from
time to
time) (filed as Exhibit 4.30 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004 and incorporated
herein
by reference).
|
|
4.30
|
Third
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2004,
among
the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, the lenders named
therein,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent, and J.P. Morgan Europe
Limited, as London Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.26 to the Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004
and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
4.31
|
Guarantee
Assumption Agreement, dated as of September 13, 2004, by Constellation
Trading Company, Inc., in favor of JP Morgan Chase Bank, as administrative
agent, pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
dated
as of August 17, 2003 (as modified and supplemented and in effect
from
time to time) (filed as Exhibit 4.31 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004 and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
|
4.32
|
Credit
Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2004, among the Company, the
Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto,
JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce
Fenner
& Smith, Incorporated, as Syndication Agent, J.P. Morgan Securities
Inc., as Sole Lead Arranger and Bookrunner, and Bank of America,
SunTrust
Bank and Bank of Nova Scotia, as Co-Documentation Agents (filed
as Exhibit
4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated December 22, 2004,
filed December 29, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
4.33
|
Certificate
of Designations of 5.75% Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred
Stock of
the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August
31, 2005
and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
4.34
|
Deposit
Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2003, by and among the Company,
Mellon
Investor Services LLC and all holders from time to time of Depositary
Receipts evidencing Depositary Shares Representing 5.75% Series
A
Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (filed as
Exhibit 4.2
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 24, 2003, filed
July 30, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
119
10.1
|
Marvin
Sands Split Dollar Insurance Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to
the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31,
1993 and also filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended February 29, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference).#
|
|
10.2
|
Employment
Agreement between Barton Incorporated and Alexander L. Berk dated
as of
September 1, 1990 as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement
between Barton Incorporated and Alexander L. Berk dated November
11, 1996
(filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended February 28, 1998 and incorporated herein by
reference).* #
|
|
10.3
|
Amendment
No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Barton Incorporated and Alexander
L.
Berk dated October 20, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1999
and
incorporated herein by reference).* #
|
|
10.4
|
Long-Term
Stock Incentive Plan, which amends and restates the Canandaigua
Wine
Company, Inc. Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Right Plan (filed
as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended May 31, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).*
#
|
|
10.5
|
Amendment
Number One to the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended August 31, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).*
#
|
|
10.6
|
Amendment
Number Two to the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (filed as
Exhibit 10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended August 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).*
#
|
|
10.7
|
Amendment
Number Three to the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended August 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).*
#
|
|
10.8
|
Amendment
Number Four to the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (filed as
Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended February 28, 2001 and incorporated herein by
reference).*#
|
|
10.9
|
Amendment
Number Five to the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (filed as
Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended August 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
*
|
|
10.10
|
Amendment
Number Six to the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (filed as
Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2004 and incorporated herein
by
reference).*
|
120
10.11
|
Form
of Terms and Conditions Memorandum for Employees with respect to
the
Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (filed
herewith).*
|
|
10.12
|
Form
of Terms and Conditions Memorandum for Directors with respect to
the
Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (filed
herewith).*
|
|
10.13
|
Form
of Restricted Stock Agreement with respect to the Company’s Long-Term
Stock Incentive Plan (filed
as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28,
2005 and
incorporated herein by reference).*
|
|
10.14
|
Incentive
Stock Option Plan of the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August
31, 1997
and incorporated herein by reference).* #
|
|
10.15
|
Amendment
Number One to the Company’s Incentive Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit
10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended August 31, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).*
#
|
|
10.16
|
Amendment
Number Two to the Company’s Incentive Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit
10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended August 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by
reference).*#
|
|
10.17
|
Amendment
Number Three to the Company’s Incentive Stock Option Plan (filed as
Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended February 28, 2001 and incorporated herein by
reference).*#
|
|
10.18
|
Form
of Terms and Conditions Memorandum with respect to the Company’s Incentive
Stock Option Plan (filed herewith).
|
|
10.19
|
Annual
Management Incentive Plan of the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.4
to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
August 31, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).*
#
|
|
10.20
|
Amendment
Number One to the Company’s Annual Management Incentive Plan (filed as
Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended February 28, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference).*
#
|
|
10.21
|
Amendment
Number Two to the Company’s Annual Management Incentive Plan (filed as
Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended February 28, 2001 and incorporated herein by
reference).*#
|
121
10.22
|
2006
Fiscal Year Award Program to the Company’s Annual Management Incentive
Plan (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May
31, 2005
and incorporated herein by reference).*+
|
|
10.23
|
Lease,
effective December 25, 1997, by and among Matthew Clark Brands
Limited and
Pontsarn Investments Limited (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28,
1999 and
incorporated herein by reference).#
|
|
10.24
|
Rent
Review Memorandum, dated August 20, 2003, to the Lease by and among
Matthew Clark Brands Limited and Pontsarn Investments Limited (filed
herewith).
|
|
10.25
|
Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan of the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.14
to the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February
28, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).* #
|
|
10.26
|
First
Amendment to the Company’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (filed
as Exhibit 10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended May 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).*
#
|
|
10.27
|
Second
Amendment to the Company’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (filed
as Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended February 28, 2001 and incorporated herein by
reference).*#
|
|
10.28
|
Third
Amendment to the Company’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (filed
as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 7,
2005, filed April 13, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).*
|
|
10.29
|
2005
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of the Company (filed as
Exhibit
99.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 7, 2005,
filed April 13, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).*
|
|
10.30
|
Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2003, among
the
Company and certain of its subsidiaries, the lenders named therein,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent, and J.P. Morgan Europe
Limited, as London Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated March 27, 2003 and incorporated herein
by
reference).
|
|
10.31
|
Amendment
No. 1, dated as of July 18, 2003, to the Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2003, among the Company and certain
of
its subsidiaries, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent
(filed
as Exhibit 4.17 to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended August 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
122
10.32
|
Second
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 31,
2003, among
the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, the lenders named
therein,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent, and J.P. Morgan Europe
Limited, as London Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.18 to the Company’s Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2003 and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
|
10.33
|
Amendment
No. 1, dated as of February 10, 2004, to the Second Amended and
Restated
Credit Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2003, among the Company,
the
Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto
and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit
4.25 to the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February
29, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.34
|
Guarantee
Assumption Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2004, by BRL Hardy Investments
(USA) Inc., BRL Hardy (USA) Inc., Pacific Wine Partners LLC and
Nobilo
Holdings in favor of JP Morgan Chase Bank, as administrative agent,
pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated
as of
October 31, 2003 (as modified and supplemented and in effect from
time to
time) (filed as Exhibit 4.30 to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.35
|
Third
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2004,
among
the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, the lenders named
therein,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent, and J.P. Morgan Europe
Limited, as London Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.26 to the Company’s Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004 and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
|
10.36
|
Guarantee
Assumption Agreement, dated as of September 13, 2004, by Constellation
Trading Company, Inc., in favor of JP Morgan Chase Bank, as administrative
agent, pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
dated
as of August 17, 2003 (as modified and supplemented and in effect
from
time to time) (filed as Exhibit 4.31 to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004 and incorporated herein
by
reference).
|
|
10.37
|
Credit
Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2004, among the Company, the
Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto,
JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce
Fenner
& Smith, Incorporated, as Syndication Agent, J.P. Morgan Securities
Inc., as Sole Lead Arranger and Bookrunner, and Bank of America,
SunTrust
Bank and Bank of Nova Scotia, as Co-Documentation Agents (filed
as Exhibit
4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated December 22, 2004,
filed December 29, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.38
|
Letter
Agreement between the Company and Thomas S. Summer, dated March
10, 1997,
addressing compensation (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2000
and
incorporated herein by reference).*
#
|
123
10.39
|
The
Constellation Brands UK Sharesave Scheme, as amended (filed as
Exhibit
10.29 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended February 28, 2002 and incorporated herein by
reference).*
|
|
10.40
|
Letter
Agreement between the Company and Thomas J. Mullin, dated February
18,
2000, addressing compensation (filed as
Exhibit 10.31 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended February 28, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference).*
|
|
10.41
|
Letter
Agreement between the Company and Stephen B. Millar, dated 9 April
2003,
addressing compensation (filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2004
and
incorporated herein by reference).*
|
|
10.42
|
Non-Competition
Agreement between Stephen Brian Millar and BRL Hardy Limited (now
known as
Hardy Wine Company Limited) dated April 8, 2003 (filed as Exhibit
10.35 to
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
February 29, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference).*
|
|
10.43
|
Memorandum
of Agreement (Service Contract) between BRL Hardy Limited (now
known as
Hardy Wine Company Limited) and Stephen Brian Millar dated 11 June
1996
(filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended February 29, 2004 and incorporated herein
by
reference).*
|
|
10.44
|
Agreement
between Constellation Brands, Inc. and Stephen Brian Millar dated
February
16, 2006 (filed herewith).*
|
|
10.45
|
BRL
Hardy Superannuation Fund Deed of Variation dated 7 October 1998,
together
with Amending Deed No. 5 made on 23 December 1999, Amending Deed
No. 6
made on 20 January 2003 and Amending Deed No. 7 made on 9 February
2004
(filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended February 29, 2004 and incorporated herein
by
reference).*
|
|
10.46
|
Description
of Compensation Arrangements for Certain Executive Officers (filed
herewith).*
|
|
10.47
|
Description
of Compensation Arrangements for Non-Management Directors (filed
herewith).*
|
|
21.1
|
Subsidiaries
of Company (filed herewith).
|
|
23.1
|
Consent
of KPMG LLP (filed herewith).
|
124
31.1
|
Certificate
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (filed
herewith).
|
|
31.2
|
Certificate
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (filed
herewith).
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350 (filed
herewith).
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350 (filed
herewith).
|
|
99.1
|
1989
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Restated June 27, 2001) (filed as
Exhibit
99.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended August 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
*
Designates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
#
Company’s Commission File No. 001-08495. For filings prior to October 4, 1999,
use Commission File No. 000-07570.
+
This
Exhibit has been filed separately with the Commission pursuant to an application
for confidential treatment. The confidential portions of this Exhibit have
been
omitted and are marked by an asterisk.
The
Company agrees, upon request of the Securities and Exchange Commission, to
furnish copies of each instrument that defines the rights of holders of
long-term debt of the Company or its subsidiaries that is not filed herewith
pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) because the total amount of long-term
debt
authorized under such instrument does not exceed 10% of the total assets
of the
Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
125